1399 users online (304 members and 1095 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 90 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1339
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,873

    2011.03.02 Motions Hearing - #2 (PM)

    Continued from #1 (AM) hearing thread [ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129940"]here[/ame].


    Continuing here for Hearing in the afternoon that will resume after break for lunch.
    Last edited by BondJamesBond; 03-02-2011 at 01:15 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,384
    reposting my question here, will it matter was the officers TOLD Casey when they removed the handcuffs, I am sure she lied about it, but I think they will be believed, will this matter at all do you think?
    ~~~~~~~
    I wonder if the officers will say what they told her when they removed the cuffs, like explain that she was not being arrested, it was a mistake or something, do you think the officers testifying will say what they told Casey when the cuffs were removed, that you are not being arrested? will that matter?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,042
    I can't believe that this one motion is taking so long to present and support!

    If each motion goes like this, we are going to be here all week!
    It's the journey, not the destination.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719
    I think this one and one other motion are the long ones. I think most of the others will be short and sweet.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,042
    I have to say I can't blame the officer for cuffing KC. He had CA in one ear ranting and saying that she wanted KC arrested for theft. Then in the next breath investigators understand what is really going on and have the officer remove the cuffs.

    CA was the cause of all of the officer's confusions.
    It's the journey, not the destination.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,978
    someone correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand defense wants all statements made by ICA until the night of the 16th thrown out due to arrest without rights being read?


    and she was in cuffs, for a few minutes, by a noob, not formally arrested, never read her rights because she was not arrested, was let out of cuffs to carry on at home that night and the next day...so where is this going?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    248
    I am lost. What motions are being argued today?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,105
    Casey Anthony Reacts During Father's Testimony
    http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-ex...822/video.html
    ________________

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South
    Posts
    3,835
    Responding to LittleBitty from the first thread. Said: this does not make Casey look/seem like an innocent little girl. (glad you are here and posting! )

    YES! Thank you. That is what I have had stuck to express, this morning. If I was just listening to the defense, I get this idea we have a little girl on trial! It is so wrong(not in a moral way, well that too)but wrong in the way of wanting to win this trial to do what they are doing! I now am waiting to see this jury! I want to see their faces from the first minute Jose starts this stuff.

    They are going to listen to one minute of him, look over at Casey and say, What!? When Jose was speaking to George he was playing the "that was your little girl" card.

    Caylee! They really cannot and do not see Caylee. That is the little girl in this story. See Jose has been drinking the Casey cool aide because every single thing they do and say it is as if Caylee never existed!

    It's not just that she was kidnapped. She never existed! If I was the SA I would start out with Caylee's birth certificate and her age.

    Jose has Casey confused with Caylee just like her family did.


    Thank you to all the people who are posting.

    John 14:6

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,873
    Request everyone keep chatter unrelated to the hearing to a minimum as much as reasonably possible.

    Full house here: 437 (187 members & 250 guests) Buncha classy people all in one place on their best behavior today ( <= expectation setting almost cleverly disguised as a gratuitous compliment ...where else ya' gonna get that, eh? )


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,865
    Last edited by BigFatMommyDog; 03-02-2011 at 01:25 PM. Reason: insert line break for clarity


    Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
    Mark Twain

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,329
    Been doing a bit of reading up on arrests. IF she was arrested, she would have had to have been read her Miranda rights. BUT, the big difference is there would have been an arrest record. There is no arrest record for that date. So no arrest, and no need to read her the Miranda rights. Looking at it, the PROS is going to have a hard time to get around that.

    MOO

    Mel

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,009
    This will wind up being the longest lunch break ever! When I think about all of the times at work I wished for my lunch break to go slowly and now I want to ramp this hour and 11 minutes left up to ludicrous speed. Lol...
    The A's are not helping themselves nor their daughter. ICA appears to have zero nice feelings for either of them.
    The smartest thing the Defense has done is give ICA a pen and tell her to write down everything. They cannot control her expressions nor gestures or momentarily freak outs at the defense table but if she is furiously scribbling all of the time and watching witnesses it minimizes some of the bad impact that her expressions and mannerisms have. But only a bit. Imagine her reactions when her friends, Tony and other family gets up their to help prove the State's case? The more she scribbles like she is the recording secretary of the glee club the better for the Defense.

    Something tells me that contempt is coming JB's way.

    Something also tells me that all of the lies KC told LE will come in. And the Defense will be stuck with "LE refused to put out a BOLO on Zanny and her accomplices Big Bird and Snoopy."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    7,032
    Just to do a quick recap of what happened in the AM part of the hearing....

    I think LDB did an excellent job with bringing forward the Anthony's inconsistencies.

    The most blaring one, and I know Cindy was lying from the beginning, is when she stated, on the stand, that she was present when John Allen told both her and George that Casey might not be coming home. On the other hand, George testified that it was Yuri Melich who called him, while he was driving, and told him that Casey would not be coming home. LDB challenged George about whether YM told him she "might" not be coming home. George was pretty adament that YM told him that Casey would not be coming home until LDB showed him his depositions answer in response to this. He says that John Allen never told him anything about Casey not coming home... so Cindy was lying.

    One thing about George's testimony that had my mouth dropped to the floor was when he said that the officer who handcuffed Casey told him that Casey was being arrested for child neglect??? I really can't wait to see what the officer says about this?

    Well, to be nice, George and Cindy did an awful lot of lying and it was very clear and I wish they would focus more on Judge Perry so I could see his reaction when he hears these blatant lies... I just want to see if he is noticing.

    There is no doubt that the Anthony's have still not learned to behave in a courtroom. They have no respect for the legal process and they will do as they please. Answer as they please.

    I really can't wait for the rest of this young officers testimony. He looks scared to death. I want to know why Casey was handcuffed? Was Cindy screaming at him to arrest Casey? What was going on? The supervising officer told him to take them off... I don't know? I'm a little worried?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by mgardner View Post
    Been doing a bit of reading up on arrests. IF she was arrested, she would have had to have been read her Miranda rights. BUT, the big difference is there would have been an arrest record. There is no arrest record for that date. So no arrest, and no need to read her the Miranda rights. Looking at it, the PROS is going to have a hard time to get around that.

    MOO

    Mel
    I think that's why GA was saying "If you can believe the officer making the record" or something to that effect, implying that just because there isn't an arrest record doesn't mean there wasn't an arrest.

Page 1 of 90 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. 2011.03.04 Motions Hearing - #1 (AM)
    By Patty G in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1204
    Last Post: 03-04-2011, 01:43 PM
  2. 2011.03.03 Motions Hearing - #3 (PM)
    By WillenFan21 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 207
    Last Post: 03-04-2011, 01:49 AM
  3. 2011.03.02 Motions Hearing - #1 (AM)
    By Patty G in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1141
    Last Post: 03-02-2011, 01:13 PM
  4. 2011.01.03 - Motions Hearing
    By beach in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1220
    Last Post: 01-04-2011, 12:36 AM