Page 1 of 91 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1362
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,081
    Fukushima Crisis Worsens as U.S. Warns of a Large Radiation Release

    This article has a broad overview, but here is this bit...

    Excerpt:
    'Doomsday' scenarios

    But the resulting radiation could be so high, "it would be almost impossible to get anyone in there," to continue supplying water to the damaged reactors, he said. That could put the cores in a meltdown scenario that could lead to an explosion within the core or a leak of puddle fuel from the bottom of the reactor -- "doomsday" scenarios that create the ultimate test of a reactor's designed defenses, he said.

    "There is a possibility if the fuel is in the right configuration, has been out of the reactor long enough, and is sufficiently air cooled that a fuel fire would not start," said one U.S. expert. "If there were a fuel fire, the radiation levels off site would go off the charts -- which they have not," he said.

    http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/03...l?pagewanted=2



    THREAD #3

    THREAD #2

    THREAD #1
    Last edited by KateB; 06-18-2015 at 05:14 PM. Reason: repair url tag.


  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Quiche For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Hinky Hollow
    Posts
    14,670
    So, am I alone in thinking: a.) they don't KNOW what's about to happen, because of "uncharted territory" and all. OR b.) they do KNOW and it's really bad and they are trying to control panic. Because I'm really getting tired of waiting on someone to just go ok, here is what we know, you can make your own decisions about what to do.
    If there's hink....there must be stink.


  4. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to tehcloser For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,293
    China on Thursday urged Japan to provide prompt, precise information about its nuclear crisis in a bid to control a flurry of rumors sweeping the region about possible dangers.
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...d/7476140.html


  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Wise Old Owl is offline Retired WS Staff & Founding member of AFKBPOFPOPL
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South FloriDUH
    Posts
    13,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiche View Post
    Fukushima Crisis Worsens as U.S. Warns of a Large Radiation Release

    This article has a broad overview, but here is this bit...

    Excerpt:
    'Doomsday' scenarios

    But the resulting radiation could be so high, "it would be almost impossible to get anyone in there," to continue supplying water to the damaged reactors, he said. That could put the cores in a meltdown scenario that could lead to an explosion within the core or a leak of puddle fuel from the bottom of the reactor -- "doomsday" scenarios that create the ultimate test of a reactor's designed defenses, he said.

    "There is a possibility if the fuel is in the right configuration, has been out of the reactor long enough, and is sufficiently air cooled that a fuel fire would not start," said one U.S. expert. "If there were a fuel fire, the radiation levels off site would go off the charts -- which they have not," he said.

    http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/03...l?pagewanted=2
    I did a lot of thinking after I got in bed last night. I'm really not worried about a "plume" of radiation floating across the Pacific and coming ashore in California. But what does worry me is in that first paragraph you posted. An "explosion" or "burst" as it was called in that article the other day. And this "explosion" doesn't concern me for the radiation that would be shot into the air - nope. Its the force of the explosion and its effect on the ground, especially underneath which is close to the epicenter of that 9.0 quake.

    An explosion of that kind could possibly have enough force to "shake the earth" and would that now cause yet another (possibly even bigger) quake than they had already?

    What would that do to our big, blue, ball? We know that this past quake shortened the day; moved the coastline and axis - so what will happen if an "atomic explosion" (and I'm sorry but what else can we call it?) takes place right over a very unstable tectonic plate?

    That is what is worrying me, at least today. Tomorrow is another day..................


  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Wise Old Owl For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Hinky Hollow
    Posts
    14,670
    It is 2011 any people are scrambling to buy SALT to protect them from radiation. SALT. A week ago if anyone had told me that would be happening - I would have told them they were crazy.
    If there's hink....there must be stink.


  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to tehcloser For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Wise Old Owl View Post
    I did a lot of thinking after I got in bed last night. I'm really not worried about a "plume" of radiation floating across the Pacific and coming ashore in California. But what does worry me is in that first paragraph you posted. An "explosion" or "burst" as it was called in that article the other day. And this "explosion" doesn't concern me for the radiation that would be shot into the air - nope. Its the force of the explosion and its effect on the ground, especially underneath which is close to the epicenter of that 9.0 quake.

    An explosion of that kind could possibly have enough force to "shake the earth" and would that now cause yet another (possibly even bigger) quake than they had already?

    What would that do to our big, blue, ball? We know that this past quake shortened the day; moved the coastline and axis - so what will happen if an "atomic explosion" (and I'm sorry but what else can we call it?) takes place right over a very unstable tectonic plate?

    That is what is worrying me, at least today. Tomorrow is another day..................
    I worry about the volcanoes.


  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Quiche For This Useful Post:


  13. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,293
    also from the link I posted above:

    Prime Minister Naota Kan told the volunteers: "You are the only ones who can resolve a crisis. Retreat is unthinkable."


    Read more: http://www.news.com.au/world/japan-n...#ixzz1Grzpk5QA


  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:


  15. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,293
    This is very interesting - video footage of the Fukushima plant from above, taken using a Tepco helicopter. It appears to show considerable damage, particularly to what the report identifies as the buildings housing reactors No 3 and 4.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog...nami-aftermath

    video is at link


  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:


  17. #9
    Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Wise Old Owl is offline Retired WS Staff & Founding member of AFKBPOFPOPL
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South FloriDUH
    Posts
    13,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiche View Post
    I worry about the volcanoes.
    well that goes right along with what I was saying.

    Here's another thought - just what is going to happen if even one of the monitors "over here" detect something? All hello is going to break loose - IMHO.

    I just heard on CNN that Dallas/Ft. Worth airport is screnning people coming from there for radiation and while they say they haven't found anything yet - do you really think they would say ther are on national network news? Talk about starting a panic - I think that would be even worse than ole NG talking about a State of Emergency last night.

    I found it interesting that today we see the first report that some "think" this "plume" will not only come in at California but cross the country, out to the Atlantic and cross that and go into Europe. Really? Wouldn't there have to be a SERIOUS amount of radiation in the air to last all that way?

    I wish we knew even half of what "authorities in the loop" are being told. But, sadly, we are sheeple - we are on a "need to know basis".


  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Wise Old Owl For This Useful Post:


  19. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,081
    http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/79010.html

    Just one of the things mentioned: -- Spent-fuel storage pools at all reactors -- Cooling functions lost, water temperature or level unobservable at reactors No. 1 to 4.

    http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/79010.html


  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Quiche For This Useful Post:


  21. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Hinky Hollow
    Posts
    14,670
    If there's hink....there must be stink.


  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to tehcloser For This Useful Post:


  23. #12
    Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Wise Old Owl is offline Retired WS Staff & Founding member of AFKBPOFPOPL
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South FloriDUH
    Posts
    13,585
    Quote Originally Posted by tehcloser View Post
    Yep and do you really think IF they can plug in these extension cords to restore power that anything is going to work? Restoring power could cause fires - especially in wiring that has been exposed and/or damaged.

    I believe and this IJMHO that radiation has been leaking since that very first hydrogen explosion at reactor #1 way back last Saturday. There is no way those spent fuel ponds are not exposed to the air (they have no containment building). There is no please else for that leakage to go but into the air.


  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Wise Old Owl For This Useful Post:


  25. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,081
    U.S. to fly spy plane over Fukushima nuclear plant for closer look

    Quote: Photographs taken by the plane equipped with infrared sensors could provide a useful clue to what is occurring inside the reactor buildings, around which high-level radiation has been detected.

    http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/78689.html


  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Quiche For This Useful Post:


  27. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,293
    thanks JBean~


    http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/...ers/index.html

    congress wants to cut pacific tsunami warning center in the new budget! really????!!!


  28. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:


  29. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36,461
    I am confining my worries and concerns to the people of Japan; they have such dire moment-to-moment needs, long-term dangers probably not even a factor in their minds as of yet. I can't worry about myself or the US right now, even if I should, as I can't think of anything that I can do about any of it. I'm not sure there is anything anyone can do. Some things are beyond our control; how extensive can past testing have been, when anything in the dire level would have been too dangerous to simulate? I don't even believe experts know what will or will not happen.
    Just my opinion, of course.


  30. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to cluciano63 For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 91 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Japan: 9.0 Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Reactor Developments #3
    By Dr. Know? in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 576
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 11:18 AM
  2. Japan: 9.0 Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Reactor Developments #2
    By nursebeeme in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 1457
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 05:32 PM
  3. Japan: Upgraded 8.8 earthquake - tsunami warning
    By Peliman in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 1124
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 09:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •