Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 524

Thread: State v Bradley Cooper 3-21-2011

  1. #176
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Lori59 View Post
    For me today's theme is ....Defense lied to you jurors. We collected all evidence at the scene and followed up on calls not limited to even some soiled toilet paper.

    I feel the same and I hope the jury is making the connection as well. I am so afraid they may lose parts of various testimony and not recall the important points the prosecution are making. It will be so very important for the prosecution to wrap everything up, neatly and succinctly, in their closing arguments so that all of the dots are connected and the jury begins deliberation with this realization.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  3. #177
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,245
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.

    Hmmm, I guess stuff was tested.

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  5. #178
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by less0305 View Post
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.

    Hmmm, I guess stuff was tested.
    So hoping Nancy got her nails dug into whoever did this....

  6. #179
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,869
    Maybe they have to present all the items and how they obtained them before they can share the results. Maybe they will be sharing the findings next?

  7. #180
    Quote Originally Posted by less0305 View Post
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.
    Sent for further testing.

    Hmmm, I guess stuff was tested.
    According to the opening statement, the items collected from the crime scene included 2 pieces of wire which were never tested, and 1 cigarette butt, which was tested a year later, and the results came back a few weeks ago. Nothing else from the crime scene was tested. No footprint impressions were made, no measurements taken of the footprints, despite taking 2 pairs of shoes to compare. Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of this has come out to be correct.

    And if I am remembering the opening correctly, there was no DNA under her fingernails, not even her own.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:


  9. #181
    TigerBalm's Avatar
    TigerBalm is offline Pray for all the missing and innocent people whose lives were taken too soon!
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,906
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    Maybe they have to present all the items and how they obtained them before they can share the results. Maybe they will be sharing the findings next?
    Yes, you do have to follow the chain of custody.

    But not in such a slowwwwwwwww drawn out manner.
    JUSTICE FOR TRAVIS!!!
    MC Superior Court ‏@courtpio
    Jury selection to begin on September 8 #JodiArias

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TigerBalm For This Useful Post:


  11. #182
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    680
    BC scratches below knees? Never saw those photos.

  12. #183
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,245
    Scratches on his legs. Fronts and backs. Both legs.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  14. #184
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Witness noticed scrapes and scratches on BC's legs and other locations on his body--and took pictures. Yea!

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  16. #185
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    130
    Scrapes on lower legs
    that's not good

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hotpinkstef For This Useful Post:


  18. #186
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,245
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfpackWoman View Post
    According to the opening statement, the items collected from the crime scene included 2 pieces of wire which were never tested, and 1 cigarette butt, which was tested a year later, and the results came back a few weeks ago. Nothing else from the crime scene was tested. No footprint impressions were made, no measurements taken of the footprints, despite taking 2 pairs of shoes to compare. Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of this has come out to be correct.

    And if I am remembering the opening correctly, there was no DNA under her fingernails, not even her own.
    With all those scratches on his legs, maybe he dunked her hands in the mop bucket and washed up real good before he dumped her body.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  20. #187
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by hotpinkstef View Post
    Scrapes on lower legs
    that's not good
    Not for defense.....makes my mind go to bad images.

  21. #188
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,869
    I don't know. I can't picture how a strangulation victim could scratch someone's legs. And they would have definitely found *some*DNA under her nails. I think the scratches are unrelated.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to sunshine05 For This Useful Post:


  23. #189
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    277
    Didn't Brad wear long pants when he helped "search" for Nancy. I know he had on a long sleeved shirt on the day he "searched". Heat index was right at 100 degrees that day, if I remember correctly.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gorealtors For This Useful Post:


  25. #190
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,079
    Defense will try to say that Brad was scratching his own legs whilst searching for Nancy...suggesting that bugs/mosquitoes bothered him.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to SleuthyGal For This Useful Post:


  27. #191
    Not to mention Howard Cummings just said that BC was out searching with shorts on in heavily wooded areas before those pictures were taken.

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:


  29. #192
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    And they would have definitely found *some*DNA under her nails. I think the scratches are unrelated.
    Not necessarily. And even if they took scrapings there is no guarantee that they could get a DNA profile on those scrapings.

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to SleuthyGal For This Useful Post:


  31. #193
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Ok, so the ADA made the point that BC had scratches on his legs, etc. And then he asked the witness if he was aware at the time of the photographs of the scratches that BC had helped with searches in wooded areas? Was that a preemptive strike to ward off the defense saying it would be natural?

  32. #194
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North of 49th Parallel
    Posts
    2,404
    Quote Originally Posted by less0305 View Post
    With all those scratches on his legs, maybe he dunked her hands in the mop bucket and washed up real good before he dumped her body.

    Ohhh WOWW..I didnt even realize this trial was goin on!! So way behind..but wish to comment on scratches on lower legs...I wonder IF he did indeed wash her hands..and then dumped body ( sorry)..and scratches got there during the disposal of body....Im sorry I dont even know what location body was found?..Boy..I apologize..I have some back reading to do to get more informed!!

  33. #195
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    I don't know. I can't picture how a strangulation victim could scratch someone's legs. And they would have definitely found *some*DNA under her nails. I think the scratches are unrelated.
    My impression would be that perhaps he had her on the floor with a leg/knee across her throat. She would be able to scratch his legs if that were the case, maybe.

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  35. #196
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by NCEast View Post
    Ok, so the ADA made the point that BC had scratches on his legs, etc. And then he asked the witness if he was aware at the time of the photographs of the scratches that BC had helped with searches in wooded areas? Was that a preemptive strike to ward off the defense saying it would be natural?
    Yes that appears to be a preemptive strike. I'm not sure it was effective, but he did bring it up first.

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to SleuthyGal For This Useful Post:


  37. #197
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,831
    The 325 was recovered from the garage under a search warrant and was taken for processing. From inside the garage.
    Racing Doesn't Lie

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raisincharlie For This Useful Post:


  39. #198
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,869
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    Not necessarily. And even if they took scrapings there is no guarantee that they could get a DNA profile on those scrapings.
    That's getting pretty far fetched, imo. They don't need much to get a DNA match and there should have been blood too. Plus, I can't visualize an attack scenario where one person would have their lower legs scratched, front and back.

  40. #199
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    Not necessarily. And even if they took scrapings there is no guarantee that they could get a DNA profile on those scrapings.
    No DNA under her nails hammers home to me that she was killed in the home at the earliest possible hour, giving him time to not only clean up the house but to rid her body/nails of all traces of his DNA. He is supposed to be a highly intelligent man. Given both his and NC's mindsets the Friday and Friday night before she disappeared he may have actually thought through every detail of murdering her and what would need to be done afterward, including the fake phone calls.
    I am still so unsure that anything the prosecution has offered thus far means anything whatsoever. I am probably reaching in my own fantasy land because I simply don't like BC. Plus, I think he's guilty and I'm just begging for the hard evidence to be there, and hurry up with it!

  41. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  42. #200
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,831
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    I don't know. I can't picture how a strangulation victim could scratch someone's legs. And they would have definitely found *some*DNA under her nails. I think the scratches are unrelated.
    To me it seems obvious the scratches on his legs are unrelated given he was out in shorts on a search...
    Racing Doesn't Lie

  43. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raisincharlie For This Useful Post:


Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 3-18-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 725
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 11:12 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 3-17-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 498
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 11:52 AM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper 3.14 .2011 - 3.?.??
    By otto in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 521
    Last Post: 03-15-2011, 01:56 PM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper 3.11.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 08:29 PM
  5. State v Bradley Cooper 3.10.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 03-12-2011, 12:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •