Page 5 of 28 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 676

Thread: State v Bradley Cooper - 3/23/11

  1. #101
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    All this show 'n tell.

    When NOTHING has been found.

    Yeah I do understand they have to show they were testing all the things they thought might have had blood or DNA or something.

    But seriously? Do they have to drone on and on when the results are 'nothing was found?'
    I guess only to show that they did test so that the defense couldn't say it could have been this or could have been that, but they didn't test it.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    N.C., USA
    Posts
    3,171
    But if they didn't... wouldn't the defense be hollaring about that?
    The Seeker / Sports Freak /

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dgfred For This Useful Post:


  4. #103
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    Also, whoever killed Nancy went to alot of trouble to make it look like she was sexually assault. The state has to PROVE no such thing happened. Over and over, each piece of evidence.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  6. #104
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,060
    Quote Originally Posted by snowshuze View Post
    I think the prosecution is doing a fine job of laying down the foundation that Nancy was ambushed, didn't have much of a chance to struggle, and was quickly rendered unconscious, strangled/asphyxiated. And possibly the only one who shed a little blood was BRAD. We'll see.
    I sure hope you are right. Usually I'm the patient, optimistic one, but even I'm losing faith right now. I think Brad killed her, no doubt in my mind as to motive, means and opportunity, most especially MOTIVE. Even my husband, every time he sees photo or video of Brad, refers to him as evil and guilty as sin.

  7. #105
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,079
    I know. I understand. Believe me, I understand. I'm not a patient person, but I do understand why they have to carefully plod through all the evidence they seized.

    But today's testimony? Might be considered the worst episode of CSI ever!

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SleuthyGal For This Useful Post:


  9. #106
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    And here's the dress.

    No blood. But there WAS a stain?
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  11. #107
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Quote Originally Posted by snowshuze View Post
    I think the prosecution is doing a fine job of laying down the foundation that Nancy was ambushed, didn't have much of a chance to struggle, and was quickly rendered unconscious, strangled/asphyxiated. And possibly the only one who shed a little blood was BRAD. We'll see.
    You are right. At some point they are going to have to do *something* to connect something, anything with Brad in order to find him guilty. If they continue to introduce all of this evidence with nothing found and no real substance, then it's just been a huge waste of time. As somebody else just stated, I feel for Nancy's parents as they sit there and hear the same 'nothing' that we're hearing.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  13. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,574
    I have watched alot of trials and i dont think ive ever seen one like this!

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to luckyme For This Useful Post:


  15. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    One small, grease like stain.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  17. #110
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    149
    Quote Originally Posted by snowshuze View Post
    And here's the dress.

    No blood. But there WAS a stain?


    I guess Brad needed to use a stain stick to get the stain out.

  18. #111
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    I guess I'm sitting on the positive bench by myself, lol. I see the prosecution as being methodical and thorough.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  20. #112
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by gracielee View Post
    I believe there was testimony, possibly yesterday, that a small piece of black trash/lawn type bag was found on the garage floor. I'm assuming that was from what Brad used to wrap the body in. I don't think he would have put her in the truck naked like that. I assume she was wrapped in something. JMO
    Why? He bought a tarp...so why not use that?

  21. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,574
    Quote Originally Posted by caryresident View Post
    I guess Brad needed to use a stain stick to get the stain out.
    He forgot the spray and wash at Harris Teeter.

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to luckyme For This Useful Post:


  23. #114
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,079
    I am feeling like the jury must be getting anxious and antsy right now. Maybe I'm just projecting my feelings onto them. But all this build-up, the DNA specialist, the credentials, the schooling, the BlahBlahBlah...leading to.... nada.

    Although we do know there was no sexual assault to N.C.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SleuthyGal For This Useful Post:


  25. #115
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,212
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    I know. I understand. Believe me, I understand. I'm not a patient person, but I do understand why they have to carefully plod through all the evidence they seized.

    But today's testimony? Might be considered the worst episode of CSI ever!
    All week there has been nothing but points which, perhaps to a jury, end up being positives in the defense column.
    I wonder if the Dateline folks are still there? I have a feeling they may have given up and left already.

  26. #116
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    Was the stain added AFTER it was laundered? Apparently it has disappeared.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  27. #117
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,574
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    Why? He bought a tarp...so why not use that?
    Is that what he bought at lowes?

  28. #118
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    Although we do know there was no sexual assault to N.C.
    How do we know that? She testified no semen, but did say there was blood, which could be the result of sexual assault. I'm sure if there was an attacker, he was likely intelligent enough to use a condom.

  29. #119
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by NCEast View Post
    I agree. And my first thought--right or wrong--went back to the scratches on Brad's legs and neck. Mostly neck.
    That might be of value if they actually had evidence of the scratches. Something like maybe a photo? But that would make too much sense for the CPD to take a photo.

  30. #120
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    82
    We did find out that laundering the dress (as BC did) would have greatly reduced her ability to obtain accurate or positive test results.

  31. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ncmomof2boys For This Useful Post:


  32. #121
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,450
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfpackWoman View Post
    How do we know that? She testified no semen, but did say there was blood, which could be the result of sexual assault. I'm sure if there was an attacker, he was likely intelligent enough to use a condom.
    She said it wasn't unusual for blood to be present.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  33. The Following User Says Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  34. #122
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by gracielee View Post
    I just don't get it, I've seen/read/heard of *touch DNA* done years later, with the new/latest technology, turning up results. How was it possible for this 'band of illegals' to grab and assault nancy cooper and leave NOTHING behind? No skin cells, no prints, no blood, NOTHING.
    I guess the same way it would be possible for Brad Cooper to grab her and leave NOTHING behind.

  35. #123
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    All this show 'n tell.

    When NOTHING has been found.

    Yeah I do understand they have to show they were testing all the things they thought might have had blood or DNA or something.

    But seriously? Do they have to drone on and on when the results are 'nothing was found?'
    I know. Why not state all the things you tested in one statement that didn't show anything..and then maybe offer an explanation as to why stuff might not show up. Would be better than this garbage.

  36. #124
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfpackWoman View Post
    How do we know that? She testified no semen, but did say there was blood, which could be the result of sexual assault. I'm sure if there was an attacker, he was likely intelligent enough to use a condom.
    She testified in her expert opinion there was no evidence of a sexual assault.

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  38. #125
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    And didn't she specify it didn't appear to be bodily fluid as well? This makes Brad's statement about her spilling something at the party seem more credible (except to those of you 100% guilty folks...I realize that nothing he says looks credible).
    Didn't seem any more credible to me - he said she spilled wine. He didn't say anything about spilling an oily/greasy substance on the dress.

  39. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


Page 5 of 28 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 3-21-2011
    By Cheyenne130 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 523
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 09:38 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 3-18-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 725
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 11:12 AM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper 3-17-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 498
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 11:52 AM
  4. State v. Bradley Cooper 03/16/11
    By less0305 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 413
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 10:31 AM
  5. State v Bradley Cooper 3.10.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 03-12-2011, 12:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •