995 users online (207 members and 788 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 139
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914

    Caylee & JonBenet

    Hello, everybody!

    Some of you may know me from the JonBenet forum. But I confess that I don't really know much about this case. So, I thought it might help if I could gain a little more knowledge.

    But I have my own reasons. What inspired me was a blurb on TV the other night. In in, it was stated that the case against Casey is purely circumstantial. I knew that, but it illustrated the difference between the approach law enforcement in Boulder took vs. the approach they take just about every place else.

    Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this:

    --the police arrested Casey before they even found a body;

    --there are no eyewitnesses, no confession, no DNA, nothing at all that would be considered a classic "smoking gun;"

    --the prosecutor in this case cared more about a little girl's death than about hurting the suspect's feelings or their politcal careers or the town's reputation;

    --Casey cannot afford high-price, politically connected lawyers;

    --the evidence against Casey is mostly anecdotal;

    --Casey had no known history of violence, mental illness, etc.

    See, over on the forum where I'm so well-known, this is the perfect counterpoint to some, who claim that literally every single case must have a "smoking gun" in order to get a conviction, that there's no such thing as putting together circumstantial evidence into a totality, that probable cause is a very easy thing to establish, etc.

    By their own logic, then, Casey has been railroaded six ways to Sunday. To me, the way this case was handled vs. the JonBenet case is night and day, but that's about the ONLY difference.

    But, as I said, I don't know that much. I am your empty cup. Fill me, baby!
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Between the beach and the river
    Posts
    6,552
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Hello, everybody!

    Some of you may know me from the JonBenet forum. But I confess that I don't really know much about this case. So, I thought it might help if I could gain a little more knowledge.

    But I have my own reasons. What inspired me was a blurb on TV the other night. In in, it was stated that the case against Casey is purely circumstantial. I knew that, but it illustrated the difference between the approach law enforcement in Boulder took vs. the approach they take just about every place else.

    Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this:

    --the police arrested Casey before they even found a body;

    --there are no eyewitnesses, no confession, no DNA, nothing at all that would be considered a classic "smoking gun;"

    --the prosecutor in this case cared more about a little girl's death than about hurting the suspect's feelings or their politcal careers or the town's reputation;

    --Casey cannot afford high-price, politically connected lawyers;

    --the evidence against Casey is mostly anecdotal;

    --Casey had no known history of violence, mental illness, etc.

    See, over on the forum where I'm so well-known, this is the perfect counterpoint to some, who claim that literally every single case must have a "smoking gun" in order to get a conviction, that there's no such thing as putting together circumstantial evidence into a totality, that probable cause is a very easy thing to establish, etc.

    By their own logic, then, Casey has been railroaded six ways to Sunday. To me, the way this case was handled vs. the JonBenet case is night and day, but that's about the ONLY difference.

    But, as I said, I don't know that much. I am your empty cup. Fill me, baby!
    In this forum JB stands for Jose' Baez,the defense attorney. Took me a minute to figure out you meant Jon Benet
    Always ,just my opinion





    *****************************************
    We never saw it coming .Please talk to your teen even if you don't think you need to !
    Far more teens commit impulsive suicide without chronic depression
    Miss U James

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern New England
    Posts
    1,280
    The lies, wild goose chase, and the 31 days until the child was reported missing makes the two cases incomparable IMO

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,807
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Hello, everybody!

    Some of you may know me from the JonBenet forum. But I confess that I don't really know much about this case. So, I thought it might help if I could gain a little more knowledge.

    But I have my own reasons. What inspired me was a blurb on TV the other night. In in, it was stated that the case against Casey is purely circumstantial. I knew that, but it illustrated the difference between the approach law enforcement in Boulder took vs. the approach they take just about every place else.

    Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this:

    --the police arrested Casey before they even found a body;

    --there are no eyewitnesses, no confession, no DNA, nothing at all that would be considered a classic "smoking gun;"

    --the prosecutor in this case cared more about a little girl's death than about hurting the suspect's feelings or their politcal careers or the town's reputation;

    --Casey cannot afford high-price, politically connected lawyers;

    --the evidence against Casey is mostly anecdotal;

    --Casey had no known history of violence, mental illness, etc.

    See, over on the forum where I'm so well-known, this is the perfect counterpoint to some, who claim that literally every single case must have a "smoking gun" in order to get a conviction, that there's no such thing as putting together circumstantial evidence into a totality, that probable cause is a very easy thing to establish, etc.

    By their own logic, then, Casey has been railroaded six ways to Sunday. To me, the way this case was handled vs. the JonBenet case is night and day, but that's about the ONLY difference.

    But, as I said, I don't know that much. I am your empty cup. Fill me, baby!
    Hi SD,

    So nice to hear from you. Welcome! Solace

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    45
    I think that the 31 days that went by before Casey admitted her daughter was missing is a smoking gun in this case. If the Ramsey's had done that then no doubt they would have been arrested too. In my opinion

  6. #6
    Wagara's Avatar
    Wagara is offline Wishin' and hopin’ and thinkin’ and prayin’...
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    988
    This case has a certain smell that JonBenet's case doesn't have. As well as duct tape and a stain in the trunk. Three smoking guns...
    Whatever I say...It's only my opinion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    5,593
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Hello, everybody!

    Some of you may know me from the JonBenet forum. But I confess that I don't really know much about this case. So, I thought it might help if I could gain a little more knowledge.

    But I have my own reasons. What inspired me was a blurb on TV the other night. In in, it was stated that the case against Casey is purely circumstantial. I knew that, but it illustrated the difference between the approach law enforcement in Boulder took vs. the approach they take just about every place else.

    Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this:

    --the police arrested Casey before they even found a body;

    --there are no eyewitnesses, no confession, no DNA, nothing at all that would be considered a classic "smoking gun;"

    --the prosecutor in this case cared more about a little girl's death than about hurting the suspect's feelings or their politcal careers or the town's reputation;

    --Casey cannot afford high-price, politically connected lawyers;

    --the evidence against Casey is mostly anecdotal;

    --Casey had no known history of violence, mental illness, etc.

    See, over on the forum where I'm so well-known, this is the perfect counterpoint to some, who claim that literally every single case must have a "smoking gun" in order to get a conviction, that there's no such thing as putting together circumstantial evidence into a totality, that probable cause is a very easy thing to establish, etc.

    By their own logic, then, Casey has been railroaded six ways to Sunday. To me, the way this case was handled vs. the JonBenet case is night and day, but that's about the ONLY difference.

    But, as I said, I don't know that much. I am your empty cup. Fill me, baby!

    Should your title read Casey and JB? Caylee was the victim. DNA is circumstantial. Thought I would point that out since you have it grouped in with direct evidence. Anecdotal evidence? Which one? There is a tremendous amount of forensics in this case and conscientiousness of guilt. I don't know where you classify the reliability of cell phone/internet evidence , Cadaver dogs, witness statements, etc. as reliable but the Judge deems it fit. Only the new science is undergoing Frye hearings to determine it's reliabilty.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Land of Pleasant Living
    Posts
    960
    Perhaps if the Ramsey's had waited 31 days before having someone call 911, they would have been treated differently, Dave.

    BTW, circumstantial evidence has the same weight in a trial as direct evidence.
    Last edited by Bee Charmer; 04-05-2011 at 02:59 PM.
    "I love people who make me laugh. I honestly think it's the thing I like most, to laugh. It cures a multitude of ills. It's probably the most important thing in a person." - Audrey Hepburn

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    The Midwest
    Posts
    12,517
    I've always thought that most murder cases ARE CIRCUMSTANTIAL. It is rare to have a witness to murder. It is putting all of the pieces together that determines the conviction.

    Look at Scott Peterson. Nobody SAW him kill Lacy and Connor. The evidence said he killed them.
    Last edited by Softail; 04-05-2011 at 02:50 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,279
    Welcome over here!! I read and follow along on the Ramsey case when I get a few minutes and love your observations!!

    A word of warning...if you have high blood pressure, you might want to remember that this case will cause your bp to go out the top of your head,lol....literally.
    It is maddening!! But stay with us please as we need probing minds like yours,IMO.
    Here.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Great Northland
    Posts
    776
    Quote Originally Posted by gypsy gal View Post
    I think that the 31 days that went by before Casey admitted her daughter was missing is a smoking gun in this case. If the Ramsey's had done that then no doubt they would have been arrested too. In my opinion
    If the Ramsey's had dumped JonBenet's body away from their home at the edge of a woods, I think they would have sailed through all their lies, without the focus and blame put on them. Even given the tell-tail ransom note. (Though folks outside Boulder figured they were involved somehow.) The powers that be in Boulder, however, were only concerned by the Ramsey's money, influence and power, + all the things SD mentioned.
    Last edited by celticthyme; 04-05-2011 at 02:38 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    SD, I think it's clear that the Ramseys were given a lot more leeway than Casey, but OTOH there is definitely more circumstantial evidence pointing to Casey than to the Ramseys.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    460
    Hi SD!

    This case also has a sweet little girl that sadly did not fit very well into the life of the accused. Caylee didn't have regular playdates or gymboree classes or zoo trips or anything remotely centered around her, as opposed to JonBenet. One of the burning questions that I still believe has not been answered is how Caylee spent her days. The grandparents both worked, and the mother had a "fake" job that she would scurry to and a "fake" nanny that was in charge of Caylee. Meanwhile, mom's be-bopping around stealing money from her family, her friends, having sex with multiple partners, spending her days on facebook planning the next night out or party.

    While it's true that there are unknowns about how Caylee died, there are several witnesses that will confirm the smell of human decomp in Casey's trunk as well as grave wax on paper towels from a trash bag from her car. A stain in the trunk, as Wagara said.

    And as gypsy gal stated, the 31 days of silence is the closest thing to a smoking gun. During this time, she was in a very happy state of mind -- partying, cheerful, getting tatoos, having regular sex. She would have gone another 31 days if her mother didn't track her down and call the police on her.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    In my treehouse
    Posts
    12,892
    The one thing I cannot get/shake is the FACT that CA was the last person VERIFIED to be seen with anALIVE CAYLEE by (people outside the Anthony family and by video taken at the nursing home) on Father's Day June 16 2008.
    ~It seems to me that everyone is choosing to overlook that fact.
    ~The rest is simply hearsay by GA and CA, who are known to lie, get violent and suffer from some form of mental instability. BOTH have been "on the record " with suicide issues.

    MOO ~ I thought the last person to see the victim alive was always the POI... and Caylee wasn't an adult that could have left grandma's and end up falling victim to foul play.
    Public consensus is KC did it and probably did, but why and how did CA escape hours of interrogation
    by LE ~ why does anyone really believe GA even saw Caylee the 16th?
    *** no offense my WS friends This keeps me awake at night... CA and GA are the loose cannons and always have been. They LIE.
    CA ~ IMO was THE LAST PERSON with an alive Caylee… beyond that I think the rest of the "story" was created during the 30/31 days until they got "stuck" having to bring home the death car. IMO only a guilty person would work that hard to remove evidence, because they knew where all of it was. CA stated "there is no "evidene" if she had NO INVOLVEMENT~ how could she say that with any degree of certainty?

    MOO MOO
    ~ my opinion only

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,768
    Hey everyone. Like Dave, I also spend most of my time on the JBR forum. However, I did follow Caylee's case in the beginning and I pay attention to the WS topics on it, so I know the basic facts of the case.

    I believe that Patsy and John Ramsey were involved in the murder of their daughter, JonBenet, and a big reason why they never spent a day in jail is because of their high-powered attorneys. Both John and Patsy had multiple lawyers, before the case even went to trial. These lawyers were very high-powered, and one of them even had connections to the Clinton White House. The Ramseys spent millions of dollars on legal fees.

    Now for Casey, I take it that Jose Baez is her main lawyer but she has other lawyers too, right? Is this their first big case? Are they working for her pro-bono (to get publicity) or is she paying them? Has it came out how much they are being paid? Do these lawyers have connections that the Ramsey lawyers had?

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Support Caylee: Porch lights on for Caylee Marie Anthony
    By mrsu in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 07:58 PM
  2. Poll: Did Casey Really Keep Caylee in the Trunk Before Caylee Died?
    By shgrbkr in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 371
    Last Post: 06-17-2011, 07:43 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 10:05 PM
  4. Do you really know JonBenet?
    By Shanny in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-19-2007, 08:45 PM