Page 4 of 30 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 734

Thread: State v. Bradley Cooper 4-7-2011

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,160
    Witness, Erick Gerhardt. Special Investigator, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Background investigation for national security. Did he work at Cisco? yes, contractor.

    SE regional safety and security coord. Region Washington DC down to Miami. Employees and vendors. Like a police role. Calls from various locations.......

    LE experience? 15 years State of NY. Worked at Cisco in 7/08. Found out NC missing. At Cisco, because of high profile, meetings with regards to employees and making sure no one came in and disrupted business.

    Security at Cisco, usual (im words) badge, like credit card etc........swipe to unlock doors.......

    At Cisco, did he have anything to do with regard to BC badge. I want to say a red flag. comings and goings of mr. cooper.

    No policy about removing items in and out of building. Employees do take things in and out. Don't check when employees take routers home.

    Did he become aware def came back to campus after 7/11? approach the witness.

    Exhibit..............email from him to ??????......inhouse security employees for Cisco on West Coast. Sent email 7/18/08..........States BC and badge had been deactivated that day.....7/17 deactivation at 10:45, prior to that.....

    Def went in and out of building 7/17, couldn't go in and out after that.

    Did he work with Det Young about SW. Did secure def's office and secured BC's office and changed lock. He was present when LE served SW.

    Kurtz..........................

    On July 17, there was no reason BC not allowed into Cisco.........correct.....he was doing nothing illegal............correct.

    Aware he went in and out of building 7/12 and 7/17......no

    done


    Sorry, have to leave for a while................fran

  2. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  3. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by Palomine View Post
    I guess we have to see who he got the call from
    We have that information. It was from nancy and was a little over 2 minutes

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gbay For This Useful Post:


  5. #78
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Just the Fax View Post
    Did he hide the router then return it to Cisco on 7-17-08?
    That would be amazing if he did and no one noticed it by that time.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  7. #79
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,449
    Changed office lock <one key> after search warrant issued.
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  9. #80
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by Just the Fax View Post
    Did he hide the router then return it to Cisco on 7-17-08?
    They did ask the other witness about employees bringing gym bags into work.

  10. #81
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    doesn't the jury find it suspect with all the defense objections? even a small minded person could pick up on this

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Palomine For This Useful Post:


  12. #82
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,259
    Gym bags, back packs, brief cases....doesn't seem any of those would be cause to notice if he was or was not carrying any of these items. Normal 'attire' on Cisco campus one would expect.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tipstaff For This Useful Post:


  14. #83
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Palomine View Post
    doesn't the jury find it suspect with all the defense objections? even a small minded person could pick up on this
    This seems pretty normal with most defense attys I think. Throw a bunch of objections out and hope something sticks.

  15. #84
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    I knew he thought about killing his kid's it only makes sense

  16. #85
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    If anything, this testimony should enlighten Cisco to the fact they are prob losing a lot of $ with missing equipment. Hire a coordinator for $40k to track an in/out log.
    I wonder if they ever did audits. I worked at a telephone company and although we took equipment home we did have to account for it when the audit was done.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gbay For This Useful Post:


  18. #86
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,903
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    Witness, Erick Gerhardt. Special Investigator, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Background investigation for national security. Did he work at Cisco? yes, contractor.

    SE regional safety and security coord. Region Washington DC down to Miami. Employees and vendors. Like a police role. Calls from various locations.......

    LE experience? 15 years State of NY. Worked at Cisco in 7/08. Found out NC missing. At Cisco, because of high profile, meetings with regards to employees and making sure no one came in and disrupted business.

    Security at Cisco, usual (im words) badge, like credit card etc........swipe to unlock doors.......

    At Cisco, did he have anything to do with regard to BC badge. I want to say a red flag. comings and goings of mr. cooper.

    No policy about removing items in and out of building. Employees do take things in and out. Don't check when employees take routers home.

    Did he become aware def came back to campus after 7/11? approach the witness.

    Exhibit..............email from him to ??????......inhouse security employees for Cisco on West Coast. Sent email 7/18/08..........States BC and badge had been deactivated that day.....7/17 deactivation at 10:45, prior to that.....

    Def went in and out of building 7/17, couldn't go in and out after that.

    Did he work with Det Young about SW. Did secure def's office and secured BC's office and changed lock. He was present when LE served SW.

    Kurtz..........................

    On July 17, there was no reason BC not allowed into Cisco.........correct.....he was doing nothing illegal............correct.

    Aware he went in and out of building 7/12 and 7/17......no

    done


    Sorry, have to leave for a while................fran
    Has anyone said before he went in and out on 7/12?

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to ohiogirl For This Useful Post:


  20. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,160
    Quote Originally Posted by ohiogirl View Post
    Has anyone said before he went in and out on 7/12?
    Not that I'm aware of. He did go in and out on 7/17, though. They're trying to figure out if he had a router. This would be compared to when LE SW the home...........................didn't find router. SW served PRIOR to BC returning to his office. IF he had a router, we don't know where it could be or is....

    fran

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  22. #88
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,856
    Quote Originally Posted by ohiogirl View Post
    Has anyone said before he went in and out on 7/12?
    I thought 7-17-08 was only mentioned?

  23. #89
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Palomine View Post
    I knew he thought about killing his kid's it only makes sense
    Did he say that or was it just the dad's opinion?

  24. #90
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by gbay View Post
    I wonder if they ever did audits. I worked at a telephone company and although we took equipment home we did have to account for it when the audit was done.
    Doesn't sound like it does it? Weird for such a big company.

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  26. #91
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    this is what is so bs about court rules...Brad alluded to the fact he was going to harm kid's ..then they go round and round ..how it can be said or asked
    bs...he should be able to say Brad had suicidal thoughts period

  27. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Palomine For This Useful Post:


  28. #92
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Did he say that or was it just the dad's opinion?
    brad said he had seen three bodies, not sure if it was dream ...but Brad said 3 bodies

  29. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Palomine For This Useful Post:


  30. #93
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    130
    there is a new Court reporter there today

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to hotpinkstef For This Useful Post:


  32. #94
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,160
    Jury out on break.

    Def att concerned with explanation of WHY NC's parents went for custody of children. They thought he may kill himself and children.......pros explaining interaction with def and what happened with children........and where children are now.

    Judge, need to proceed carefully and with care. Obj to NC's statements coming in, violation of BC's rights, 5 and 6......Doesn't want to object during Mr. Rentz's testimony. Obj overruled.

    Gotta run

    PS.....oh, I see that was a dream about dead bodies? didn't catch that part,

  33. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  34. #95
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Tipstaff View Post
    Gym bags, back packs, brief cases....doesn't seem any of those would be cause to notice if he was or was not carrying any of these items. Normal 'attire' on Cisco campus one would expect.
    If he brought it back though (instead of dumping), wouldn't that stuff be somehow accounted for by now (esp. the FXO card by serial number)? I haven't heard anything if this is or is not the case.

  35. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Palomine View Post
    this is what is so bs about court rules...Brad alluded to the fact he was going to harm kid's ..then they go round and round ..how it can be said or asked
    bs...he should be able to say Brad had suicidal thoughts period
    But what does "BC alluded to" mean? Did he come out and say it or not?

    On another note, does this mean NC's dad is coming up next?

  36. #97
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Missourah
    Posts
    3,449
    Brad HAD that router. Had it in his home, used it in his home, before Nancy asked him to disconnect the system. The sticking point here, IMO, is WHERE was that router the day Nancy died? SW carried out, it was NOT found in the home. If it's not in the office, WHERE is it? And WHY would it just disappear?

    If it IS in the office, WHEN did it get there?
    "In the end, everything will be made known. Everything will come out. And in the meantime, smile and say "cheese." - Jodi Arias


  37. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snowshuze For This Useful Post:


  38. #98
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by snowshuze View Post
    Brad HAD that router. Had it in his home, used it in his home, before Nancy asked him to disconnect the system. The sticking point here, IMO, is WHERE was that router the day Nancy died? SW carried out, it was NOT found in the home. If it's not in the office, WHERE is it? And WHY would it just disappear?
    Since Cisco has no inventory control, I wonder if BC could have brought it back and someone else used it?

  39. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  40. #99
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,034
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    Jury out on break.

    Def att concerned with explanation of WHY NC's parents went for custody of children. They thought he may kill himself and children.......pros explaining interaction with def and what happened with children........and where children are now.

    Judge, need to proceed carefully and with care. Obj to NC's statements coming in, violation of BC's rights, 5 and 6......Doesn't want to object during Mr. Rentz's testimony. Obj overruled.

    Gotta run

    PS.....oh, I see that was a dream about dead bodies? didn't catch that part,
    Brad's *rights* again. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for *rights*, but some of these objections are ridiculous.

  41. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:


  42. #100
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    But what does "BC alluded to" mean? Did he come out and say it or not?

    On another note, does this mean NC's dad is coming up next?
    he is on the stand now...he said it to Nancy's dad..thats what the defense objected too before he started testifying...Defense thinks suicide is prejudicial

  43. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Palomine For This Useful Post:


Page 4 of 30 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 4-5-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 877
    Last Post: 04-07-2011, 11:27 PM
  2. State v. Bradley Cooper 4-6-2011
    By cityslick in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 940
    Last Post: 04-07-2011, 11:22 PM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper 3-17-2011
    By CyberPro in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 498
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 11:52 AM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper 3.14 .2011 - 3.?.??
    By otto in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 521
    Last Post: 03-15-2011, 01:56 PM
  5. State v Bradley Cooper 3.10.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 03-12-2011, 12:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •