1014 users online (234 members and 780 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 53 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 781
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    542

    April 8th wknd of Sleuthing

    Weekend thread anyone?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    542
    So how long do you guys think this trial will last? Will the Prosecution be done end of this coming week you think?

    Anyone want to talk about their other theories that make BC innocent?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    I like the idea!

    My theory and it's based on a lot of little tiny details. I'll give the theory and if anyone wants the details, I'll lay them out.

    I think that based on what she ate and drank at the party she was feeling sick. I think once she saw the lights out she hurried home because she was feeling nauseous. I think she went in the house and got sick to her stomach. (In a toilet, not on the floor) I think she fell into bed still in her dress. I do think that Katie started crying at 4 a.m. but I don't think Brad was in bed with her. I think that Nancy may have gotten up and yelled at him to get up and take care of her because it was "his weekend" to take care of the girls. During that confrontation I think she ended up being strangled by her husband and I do think it ended up down in the foyer. That's my theory.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheyenne130 View Post
    I like the idea!

    My theory and it's based on a lot of little tiny details. I'll give the theory and if anyone wants the details, I'll lay them out.

    I think that based on what she ate and drank at the party she was feeling sick. I think once she saw the lights out she hurried home because she was feeling nauseous. I think she went in the house and got sick to her stomach. (In a toilet, not on the floor) I think she fell into bed still in her dress. I do think that Katie started crying at 4 a.m. but I don't think Brad was in bed with her. I think that Nancy may have gotten up and yelled at him to get up and take care of her because it was "his weekend" to take care of the girls. During that confrontation I think she ended up being strangled by her husband and I do think it ended up down in the foyer. That's my theory.
    That makes a lot of sense. I picture her not going to bed though and getting a diet coke, he heard her and they had a confrontation and she headed over to the stairs to get up to bed and he pulled her back. I do believe it all happened in the foyer too.. Those decorative sticks and ducks missing is just weird.. so he tossed them... he knew he had to get rid of her before the kids woke up and sat around thinking about it and then left around 530 and drove to find somewhere..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimeAddict View Post
    That makes a lot of sense. I picture her not going to bed though and getting a diet coke, he heard her and they had a confrontation and she headed over to the stairs to get up to bed and he pulled her back. I do believe it all happened in the foyer too.. Those decorative sticks and ducks missing is just weird.. so he tossed them... he knew he had to get rid of her before the kids woke up and sat around thinking about it and then left around 530 and drove to find somewhere..
    My brain keeps wanting to put the 4 a.m. time in there for a reason. I don't think he pulled that out of thin air. There is always small points of truth even in the biggest lies. I'm thinking that 4:00-4:30 was significant for some reason.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheyenne130 View Post
    My brain keeps wanting to put the 4 a.m. time in there for a reason. I don't think he pulled that out of thin air. There is always small points of truth even in the biggest lies. I'm thinking that 4:00-4:30 was significant for some reason.
    I totally think so too! I think that was when the lights were on and he was cleaning up the foyer.. definitely was worried someone in the neighborhood would see that light on!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,338
    Reading through the affidavits, watching the testimony, seeing the overly involved behavior and putting all the pieces together I believe that JA lied and she knows more than she is telling about the crime. Too many parts of her story do not make sense.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimeAddict View Post
    That makes a lot of sense. I picture her not going to bed though and getting a diet coke, he heard her and they had a confrontation and she headed over to the stairs to get up to bed and he pulled her back. I do believe it all happened in the foyer too.. Those decorative sticks and ducks missing is just weird.. so he tossed them... he knew he had to get rid of her before the kids woke up and sat around thinking about it and then left around 530 and drove to find somewhere..
    I am going to have to wait for closing arguments..for the pros to put it all together for me. I have no doubt that he did it. I can't figure out if she was getting dressed or undressed at the time of death. I want to hear the computer evidence

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimeAddict View Post
    I totally think so too! I think that was when the lights were on and he was cleaning up the foyer.. definitely was worried someone in the neighborhood would see that light on!
    It's interesting to me to see all the different ideas. I'm not sure that the minor details are as important as the bigger details that point to who is responsible. I actually wish that we could talk about the theories that people have that point to someone else without naming the someone else. The biggest thing for me when theories of "others" come up (including her jogging that morning) is that she should have driven her car under any scenario. If her car had not been at the home, I would be more inclined to believe it may have been someone else.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthinNC View Post
    Reading through the affidavits, watching the testimony, seeing the overly involved behavior and putting all the pieces together I believe that JA lied and she knows more than she is telling about the crime. Too many parts of her story do not make sense.
    Can you specify which parts do not make sense? And is CC involved in this as well?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheyenne130 View Post
    It's interesting to me to see all the different ideas. I'm not sure that the minor details are as important as the bigger details that point to who is responsible. I actually wish that we could talk about the theories that people have that point to someone else without naming the someone else. The biggest thing for me when theories of "others" come up (including her jogging that morning) is that she should have driven her car under any scenario. If her car had not been at the home, I would be more inclined to believe it may have been someone else.
    In his affidavit SH said that when he ran with with Nancy she walked up to Lochmere to meet him. her leaving the house to run without her car does not seem so far fetched to me after hearing that.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,914
    NC told her sister she was not "into" painting JA's house when they spoke on Friday (7/11). JA claims it was NC's idea to paint the DR on Saturday morning and that they would do a "swap". JA would help her organize her home and unpack some of the boxes...JA would help her paint her DR. The problem is...NC had called her RE agent the previous day and said she wanted to find a place ASAP. He said it sounded "urgent". So why would she need JA's help to organize and unpack if she was planning to move very soon?

    Keep in mind that NC would not be receiving any money for this job and we already know that she didn't feel like painting JA's house. Why would NC have made plans to paint there on Saturday? She told not one person at the party that she was going to paint at JA's the next day and she was quite talkative that night. She even told people she planned to go to the pool the next day. No mention of the painting.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthinNC View Post
    In his affidavit SH said that when he ran with with Nancy she walked up to Lochmere to meet him. her leaving the house to run without her car does not seem so far fetched to me after hearing that.
    That is true but she also was running with a partner. Since she didn't use an ipod or mp3 player, it seems that she liked the company. She did run alone on the treadmill at LTF. I'm waiting for the witnesses for the defense that testify to seeing her running alone in Lochmere.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheyenne130 View Post
    Can you specify which parts do not make sense? And is CC involved in this as well?
    The painting story doesn't add up. Nobody knew about it but people did know about Brad's tennis plans. In his affidavit MH says he specifically asked JA if Nancy was planning to bring the girls with her to paint and JA said no.

    The All detergent. She completely made up that story down to the details of them using it because on of the girls had allergies.

    Going over to help NC organize the girls' room after Nancy calls the Realtor saying she needed to get out urgently.

    Calling Nancy while she was at the party on the 11th to ask if she wanted to leave the party and come to her house to drink wine. No discussion of the painting plans on this call. Not even "OK, Ill see you in the morning"

    There is more but I need to go back and look at her affidavit again.

    ETA: I don't think CC was intentionally involved. I think JA subtly planted the idea of the painting plans which is why CC was off with the time she heard about the plans.
    Last edited by SleuthinNC; 04-08-2011 at 10:52 PM. Reason: added the CC thoughts

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    NC told her sister she was not "into" painting JA's house when they spoke on Friday (7/11). JA claims it was NC's idea to paint the DR on Saturday morning and that they would do a "swap". JA would help her organize her home and unpack some of the boxes...JA would help her paint her DR. The problem is...NC had called her RE agent the previous day and said she wanted to find a place ASAP. He said it sounded "urgent". So why would she need JA's help to organize and unpack if she was planning to move very soon?

    Keep in mind that NC would not be receiving any money for this job and we already know that she didn't feel like painting JA's house. Why would NC have made plans to paint there on Saturday? She told not one person at the party that she was going to paint at JA's the next day and she was quite talkative that night. She even told people she planned to go to the pool the next day. No mention of the painting.
    Do you believe that CC was lying when she said that Nancy told her on Friday morning that she would not be able to run on Saturday because she was going to be painting?

Page 1 of 53 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. April 15th wknd of Sleuthing
    By CrimeAddict in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 713
    Last Post: 04-18-2011, 01:34 PM

Tags for this Thread