Page 9 of 75 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 19 59 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 1111
  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by cassius View Post
    It is clear this judge does absolutely no critical thinking in making any rulings. The fact that he even mentioned the WS post relying solely on the State's assertion that it was JW is mindboggling. For crying out loud, I could have registered as JW and made the post he made.
    ...or someone from the State could have made that posting, for that matter. (I am NOT suggesting that's what happened here. I think JW probably did post that and that it was an absolutely BONEHEADED thing to do.) I'm just saying it should be verified that JW indeed made the posting if it was considered in Gessner's ruling.
    "I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FullDisclosure For This Useful Post:


  3. #122
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by bloghooligan View Post
    Are they allowing Mr. M to be questioned outside the presence of the jury on Thursday or Friday? Or did I misunderstand?

    Sorry for the repost... does anyone know?


  4. #123
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostCrab View Post
    This could go on forever.
    Yah, its a slow spiral to the case testimony but its pretty solid insulation for his credentials.

    I am starting to wonder if this witness actually found data on the "wiped" NC phone among other things...

    Tender for expert witness wireless telephony/wireless forensics


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  6. #124
    Quote Originally Posted by bloghooligan View Post
    Sorry for the repost... does anyone know?
    I think that's for an offer of proof, and will have no bearing on the trial. But yes. They can possibly do their offer of proof Thursday or Friday afternoon, since the jury has requested a half day.


  7. #125
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,241
    Quote Originally Posted by cassius View Post
    It is clear this judge does absolutely no critical thinking in making any rulings. The fact that he even mentioned the WS post relying solely on the State's assertion that it was JW is mindboggling. For crying out loud, I could have registered as JW and made the post he made.
    They said they could round up JW and bring him in. I think they should have - to be honest with you. But the fact remained the witness also testified from the stand that he was not a forensic expert.
    It's my own two cents. You don't have to read or like it.


  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  9. #126
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    734
    Sumpin bout this guy I don't like. But seems he is very knowledgeable and an expert. Why the finger tapping, rolling eyes at the state and looking at the jurors while the decision is being made.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to kljohnson0458 For This Useful Post:


  11. #127
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    witness: SIM card was totally wiped.

    -stop testimony

    morning recess break.


  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  13. #128
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by kljohnson0458 View Post
    Sumpin bout this guy I don't like. But seems he is very knowledgeable and an expert. Why the finger tapping, rolling eyes at the state and looking at the jurors while the decision is being made.
    Seems like he can't wait to say whatever it is he's there to talk about re: the case.


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  15. #129
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by gracielee View Post
    thank you so much, made a little icon for the screen on this computer. Hopefully I won't have to ask again. Isn't this the guy Nancy Grace uses frequently?
    Yes, this is the Nancy Grace guy.


  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lib's mom For This Useful Post:


  17. #130
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by RaleighNative View Post
    LOL, I feel like i'm listening to my husband when he discusses work. He goes on and on and on about this stuff. I tune out for 75% of it.
    I'm kicking myself for tuning the hubby out on this stuff - it sure would come in useful right now had I been paying attention to everything! I think this testimony is about to get really interesting.


  18. The Following User Says Thank You to RaleighNative For This Useful Post:


  19. #131
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,065
    What happened? Why did that break come so quickly and it appeared to be called by 'Kurtz'?


  20. #132
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    just beyond infinity
    Posts
    238
    This witness testified that the sim card can be moved from phone to phone, and if you receive a call on the new phone, it will ring. The phone is nothing more than a radio transmitter and reciever, and the sim card is what determines the capability of the phone.
    Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)


  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LAWsy_ME For This Useful Post:


  22. #133
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by gracielee View Post
    What happened? Why did that break come so quickly and it appeared to be called by 'Kurtz'?
    Yah, that's odd, but judge appeared to be acting in concert.


  23. #134
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,065
    Quote Originally Posted by lib's mom View Post
    Yes, this is the Nancy Grace guy.
    I'm surprised she ever get's *repeat experts* to appear on her show, the way she's so nasty to them.


  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:


  25. #135
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by cassius View Post
    It is clear this judge does absolutely no critical thinking in making any rulings. The fact that he even mentioned the WS post relying solely on the State's assertion that it was JW is mindboggling. For crying out loud, I could have registered as JW and made the post he made.
    JW testified in this trial that he did not claim to be a forensic expert.


  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to unc70 For This Useful Post:


Page 9 of 75 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 19 59 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 4-13-11
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1157
    Last Post: 04-14-2011, 11:03 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 04/11/11
    By ncsu95 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 999
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 10:03 AM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/25/11
    By Cheyenne130 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1081
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 09:26 AM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/24/11
    By Salem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 667
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 09:51 AM
  5. Found Deceased State v Bradley Cooper - 3/23/11
    By jmflu in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 676
    Last Post: 03-24-2011, 09:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •