Page 9 of 45 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 1111

Thread: State v Bradley Cooper 4-25-11

  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    OK, we get it. LE messed up and the phone was empty.

    What's the point of this testimony again?

    JMHO
    fran
    That it was intentional, and not just an "oops" moment that Young testified to.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:


  3. #202
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Hartzy34 View Post
    This guy seems to be one of those awkward, techie geeks but clearly knows his stuff. When he's trying to explain something his brain seems to be one step ahead of his words. I find that a lot in 'techie geeks' who are trying to speak in layman's terms. Might explain some of his ineptness.
    according to his testimony, he's about 8 years ahead of everyone else!!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:


  5. #203
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,404
    Quote Originally Posted by LAWsy_ME View Post
    Talking directly to the jury.....isn't this against rules of how to testify.
    I'll ask my daughter. She does this. I THOUGHT they were supposed to make a connection to the jury when they're testifying as an expert.

    JMHO
    fran

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  7. #204
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,042
    Quote Originally Posted by LAWsy_ME View Post
    Talking directly to the jury.....isn't this against rules of how to testify.
    No, he can and should turn and address the jury when he testifies, but he isn't supposed to engage them in a back & forth discussion, question them, the way JW did. My curiousity was that this expert isn't more knowledgable about common court room terminology and procedures, LIke just now, 'objection, non responsive to the question'. Usually experts are so well trained in courtroom testimony. They know how to avoid hearsay rules, how to answer succeintly, etc.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:


  9. #205
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    878
    Quote Originally Posted by NCEast View Post
    Night of July 11 BC had a router LE never found.
    I find that highly suspect, the FBI had 2.5 years to make note of this and they jsut do it this week, and it is not even in evidence yet, all that has happened is that BZ stated it before the jury as if though it was truth, that was underhanded, he was testifying and that is not appropriate.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Danielle59 For This Useful Post:


  11. #206
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Danielle59 View Post
    Not saying they don't read it, I don't know, but I think someone from here sent it to the Prosecution.

    I think some of the BDI'ers would love to be able to testify in this case, but if they can at least get some acknowledgement from the Prosecution they feel like they are a part of it.
    Someone said it should be sent to the judge. I remember the discussion. So, you might be correct. I have no idea whether JW actually posted here, or who sent it to the judge or prosecution.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cody100 For This Useful Post:


  13. #207
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    878
    Quote Originally Posted by macd View Post
    Another smoking gun. Sounds like an FXO supportable router was present before the spoof call, and missing after.
    BZ didn't slip testimony in saying that an FXO supportable router was present, he said a router. Unless I totally misunderstood, but bottomline, that was inappropriate of BZ to say before the jury, he is not an expert witness.

  14. #208
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,404
    What is the purpose of this testimony?

    The phone is blank.

    Cannot be used by the pros.

    Cannot be used by the def.

    So?
    fran

  15. #209
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    646
    Quote Originally Posted by Danielle59 View Post
    BZ didn't slip testimony in saying that an FXO supportable router was present, he said a router. Unless I totally misunderstood, but bottomline, that was inappropriate of BZ to say before the jury, he is not an expert witness.
    Jury wasn't present during arguments.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carolinalady For This Useful Post:


  17. #210
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Wyn View Post
    Local on craigslist, meet and pay cash. Stop by the flea market at the fair grounds, pay cash. Pretty easy.
    I've bought on ebay and mailed a money order.
    It's my own two cents. You don't have to read or like it.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  19. #211
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    732
    Quote Originally Posted by Danielle59 View Post
    BZ didn't slip testimony in saying that an FXO supportable router was present, he said a router. Unless I totally misunderstood, but bottomline, that was inappropriate of BZ to say before the jury, he is not an expert witness.
    He wasn't testifying. The jury wasn't in the room.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to lib's mom For This Useful Post:


  21. #212
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by less0305 View Post
    I've bought on ebay and mailed a money order.
    Again, it all leaves a trail (searches on ebay, searches on craigslist, etc.) hence the lack of either: 1) follow up by the cops or 2) finding of anything significant.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  23. #213
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,042
    Ben Levitan appears to be in his 'nancy grace guest' mode rather than his solemn courtroom expert witness mode.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:


  25. #214
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by less0305 View Post
    I've bought on ebay and mailed a money order.
    They testified serial numbers matched...this was definitely NC's mobile phone.

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RaleighNative For This Useful Post:


  27. #215
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    734
    I can see this witness causing a bit of a ruckus come Cross. Very knowledgeable and rambles on and on like he's lecturing but knows his stuff. I think he will be obviously testy with Zell.

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kljohnson0458 For This Useful Post:


  29. #216
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,914
    Finally I can hear the questions.

  30. #217
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by macd View Post
    This post says that 10 incorrect password attempts will wipe a blackberry.
    http://www.bbgeeks.com/blackberry-gu...ckberry-88202/
    So, if BC knew this, and entered the wrong password in 9 times, the next attempt by Cary PD will have wiped the phone.
    The phone is extremely explicit when before it wipes the data. In big letters it says something to the effect "All information will be wiped" and then has you confirm this by typing out the word "blackberry" in an ominous looking box.

    There is no mistaking this phone was wiped and whoever did it was very aware of what was going on at the time.

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to foltster For This Useful Post:


  32. #218
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,404
    This, IMHO, is a complete waste of time.

    JMHO
    fran

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  34. #219
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    What is the purpose of this testimony?

    The phone is blank.

    Cannot be used by the pros.

    Cannot be used by the def.

    So?
    fran
    Not sure where this will end up eventually, but bo far, improper handling and custody of evidence (the phone) has been highlighted.

    Remember, he examined the phone twice - we're hearing only about the first time.

  35. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  36. #220
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,831
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    What is the purpose of this testimony?

    The phone is blank.

    Cannot be used by the pros.

    Cannot be used by the def.

    So?
    fran
    Smoke and mirrors ? Gotta say something ? The point seems to me an attempt to impeach Detective Young and what he supposedly did with respect to the phone. I see a red herring, smell it too.
    Racing Doesn't Lie

  37. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to raisincharlie For This Useful Post:


  38. #221
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by Danielle59 View Post
    BZ didn't slip testimony in saying that an FXO supportable router was present, he said a router. Unless I totally misunderstood, but bottomline, that was inappropriate of BZ to say before the jury, he is not an expert witness.
    The jury was out at the time.
    Defense brought objections to two future witnesses: the bird-man (rebuttal witness) and recall of cisco employee to testify to recently found VPN records.
    BZ just argued against the objections.

  39. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to macd For This Useful Post:


  40. #222
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    878
    Quote Originally Posted by gracielee View Post
    LOL, you'ze gettin' robbed? just teasin'. IEEE is one of the professional organizations most engineers belong to. Recognized internationally. Perhaps JW could add that to his resume?
    The IEEE is for electrical and electronics engineering, a civil engineer, for example would not likely belong to it.

  41. #223
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    just beyond infinity
    Posts
    238
    Perhaps Boz will ask on cross about what knowledge this witness can reveal about *who* may have done all this *work* with the phone.

    eta: If there is no knowledge of *who* did the work.....does nothing to help the defense IMO

    specifically, *who* has the sledgehammer.
    Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)

  42. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LAWsy_ME For This Useful Post:


  43. #224
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chaska, MN
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by johnfear View Post
    Again, it all leaves a trail (searches on ebay, searches on craigslist, etc.) hence the lack of either: 1) follow up by the cops or 2) finding of anything significant.
    No search on ebay or craigslist...just google maps

  44. #225
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    This, IMHO, is a complete waste of time.

    JMHO
    fran
    Agree. It's not adding anything to what we already know. Hey Defense, where's the meat???

  45. The Following User Says Thank You to AnotherSleuth For This Useful Post:


Page 9 of 45 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171819 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 4-13-11
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1157
    Last Post: 04-14-2011, 11:03 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 04/11/11
    By ncsu95 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 999
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 10:03 AM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/25/11
    By Cheyenne130 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1081
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 09:26 AM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/24/11
    By Salem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 667
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 09:51 AM
  5. Found Deceased State v Bradley Cooper - 3/23/11
    By jmflu in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 675
    Last Post: 03-24-2011, 09:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •