Page 23 of 47 FirstFirst ... 131415161718192021222324252627282930313233 ... LastLast
Results 551 to 575 of 1169

Thread: State v Bradley Cooper 4-28-2011

  1. #551
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by kljohnson0458 View Post
    Well there ya go. BII. I guess the defense can rest now. Glad to be on the ground now.
    The jury will not see this testimony. JG already excluded it.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:


  3. #552
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,703
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    Gessner has already ruled on this. This is for appeal only. I wonder if Gessner is regretting that decision at this point.
    Oh, ok. I'm getting very confused. Can he change his decision?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  5. #553
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
    Proffered on the record only for purposes of requesting an appeal, testimony will not make it to this jury.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  7. #554
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,703
    Quote Originally Posted by johnfear View Post
    Come on, Boz. You can DO this. Ask just one wrong question so the judge can (at his discretion) allow this back into the defense.

    Come on......
    I didn't understand this comment before. Now I get it.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  9. #555
    Quote Originally Posted by jrb0124 View Post
    Regardless, the evidence was tampered with. The deleted Google maps cookie was a faked file. The state of the files changed after being taken into possession of LE and before any forensic examination. The evidence has no integrity. That's the bottom line.
    Absolutely. I'm just cutting off the discussion others were having that said "Oh, CPD or neighbors couldn't have hacked it, because it was coming through the VPN."

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:


  11. #556
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,667
    I may not be in the majority...lol...but no one "tampered" with the computer, IMHO.

  12. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:


  13. #557
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,766
    whine....beg....whine....beg
    IMO

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Amster For This Useful Post:


  15. #558
    here we go... big moment here

  16. #559
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,914
    I was just talking to my husband about this. (He has Cisco VPN). I asked him if BC was already on the computer through VPN and since the computer was left on, that is how they could have messed with files through VPN. (he said, sure).

    Also, there is VPN software that could be installed on another computer. But there is no reason he would have needed to be on the VPN to get to any files on the computer. He could have just went straight to the computer, outside of the VPN.

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sunshine05 For This Useful Post:


  18. #560
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    This is better than a State/UNC/Duke/Wake free-for-all game at the Dome or Cameron.

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  20. #561
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,235
    Kurtz now asking judge to reconsider allowing witness testimony...

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  22. #562
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    just beyond infinity
    Posts
    238
    Quote Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
    I may not be in the majority...lol...but no one "tampered" with the computer, IMHO.
    maybe brad? last ditch effort to cover his tracks?
    Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)

  23. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LAWsy_ME For This Useful Post:


  24. #563
    for those not watching... Defense asking Judge to reconsider allowing this testimony in court

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yeknomaras For This Useful Post:


  26. #564
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Raleigh
    Posts
    1,057
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Oh, ok. I'm getting very confused. Can he change his decision?
    He certainly can.

  27. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gritguy For This Useful Post:


  28. #565
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    Poor Boz. Watch this bite him!

    Hey judge!

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  30. #566
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Raleigh
    Posts
    1,057
    state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!

  31. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gritguy For This Useful Post:


  32. #567
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by gritguy View Post
    state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!
    Oh what a tangled web we weave.

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:


  34. #568
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,433
    Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:


  36. #569
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    4,060
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Could be she forgot. When I have my kids with me at the market, I forgot most of the important stuff.
    I will say Nancy Coopers little girls appeared to be very well-behavied in the shopping cart, while she was checking out. What a sad sight to see. the last time they would ever be out with their mom.

  37. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:


  38. #570
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.
    Too messy. (Remember the facebook mess)

  39. The Following User Says Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  40. #571
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    325
    This might all be moot considering the state of the jury.

  41. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GhostCrab For This Useful Post:


  42. #572
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North of 49th Parallel
    Posts
    2,408
    I say, let the guy in after the router evidence gets testified to..as maybe it does show exactly who accessed the computer via VPN.... And this witness hasnt even completed his report yet..so bottomline maybe his FINAL anaysis may end up either proving Pros. or Def. side of things....

    Just as aside.I liked this witness..he did come across very affable!! pleasant and forthcoming.... Yikes, whole line of typing got missed...Regarding the Cisco coming in late in the game regarding the router...Who found it??Wonder who left it there?...Geesh, I wish Cisco had a better controls of tracking their gear!!

  43. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LyndyLoo For This Useful Post:


  44. #573
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,915
    Where did this expert come from? I missed the beginning.

  45. #574
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    325
    ornithologist...the owl!

  46. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GhostCrab For This Useful Post:


  47. #575
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170
    JG..."We may not even get to rebuttal evidence." Wonder what he is thinking there.

  48. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:


Page 23 of 47 FirstFirst ... 131415161718192021222324252627282930313233 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 04-20-2011
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1039
    Last Post: 04-21-2011, 09:47 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 04-18-2011
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 740
    Last Post: 04-19-2011, 12:21 PM
  3. State v. Bradley Cooper 4-7-2011
    By hotpinkstef in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 733
    Last Post: 04-08-2011, 02:58 PM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper 03-30-2011
    By less0305 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 664
    Last Post: 03-31-2011, 10:30 AM
  5. State v Bradley Cooper 3.11.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 08:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •