I just watched the HT video. she is absolutely not wearing the necklace.
but.... it doesn't matter.
Does anyone remember when the first discussions of the necklace began in this case? Was it before or after BC was taken into custody? Was it in the news in '08?
If the note the jury sent the judge today is any indication, they don't want to hear anymore about ducks, sticks or necklaces.
I 'm holding a space here for<modsnip>, the innocent children in all of this. I know what it is like to raise a young child without one parent due to death, because I live and my husband died of cancer when our son was 4 1/2, <modsnip>, at the time of Nancy's death. I know the sadness the surviving parent experiences. I know the yearning of a child to remember what life was like before everything changed suddenly. It is so hard to explain death to children when they are that young. I feel deeply for <modsnip>. I know what it is like to miss my twin, to yearn deeply for a connection that is no longer there.
Just to not lose sight of these innocent victims, I wanted to post a victim statement.
At some point this trial will be over. Regardless of the outcome, these sad and hard facts of life and death remain, and there really is no justice to make it right. There is no true justice for the children. It is not fair.....but it is what they will grapple with for the rest of their lives. I cry for them and I hold their innocence closely to my own heart. I never knew Nancy.
Last edited by Salem; 04-29-2011 at 01:29 AM.
Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)
So what exactly does the note from the jurors mean? Does it mean that the Judge is not going to allow new experts to be added to list, as it would mean making the trial even longer? Does it mean that jurors have heard enough to make a decision?
Why did JA really call NC from BA cell phone late at night when NC was at the party on July 11th? Calling to see if she wanted to leave the party to go to JA to drink wine does not make sense.
Hoisted with his own Petard
First necklace reference seems to start here: This is in the post on here from this site.
Page 1 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > Last »
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
08-28-2008, 11:33 PM
08-29-2008, 12:06 AM
Join Date: Mar 2007
thanks, entrenous. i was trying to think of tom's name.
i was looking at the pictures on the memorial site and nancy was wearing her diamond stud earrings and diamond necklace at the party that night (titled "the saddest party").
i wonder whether these were the pieces of jewelry that her family asked for.
if they were still on her body, it would point away from a random killer (although not for certain).
Last edited by johnfear; 04-28-2011 at 08:52 PM. Reason: saved from wasting a huge amount of space.
My posts contain only my opinions. (And a few me and your mom came up with during pillowtalk)
Those pictures are such low resolution I think it is inconclusive. In some I think I see a necklace. The picture with the line markers for reference look to me like there is one.
Either way, doesn't matter. The necklace testimony was never good quality evidence. The problem is the prosecution went along with Nancy's friends by making a big deal of it.
Where oh where is JA friend Mary? She seemed to be presnet at every critical point in JA testimony.
And how did JA know to flag down KP at the gym when she said she barely knew HP just through preschool and NC?
Hoisted with his own Petard