Page 37 of 78 FirstFirst ... 27 35 36 37 38 39 47 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 1169
  1. #541
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Wouldn't it be shocking if the judge didn't allow this?
    I keep hoping he remembered to put a "Not a big fan of Boz" interest on his facebook page.

    This guy seems top notch.


  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  3. #542
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,815
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    He has no reason not to be. This testimony won't make it into the trial. No sense getting worked up or attacking the witness.
    Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."


  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  5. #543
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    Quote Originally Posted by NCEast View Post
    I really like this man. He is genuine and well versed in his specialty. Not a grand-stander like JW was.
    He is a true expert in his field, a great testifier, and extremely genuine and honest. Too bad they did not find him instead of JW.


  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to cody100 For This Useful Post:


  7. #544
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    I can tell you what versions I used. (He's still working on it)!!!!!!!!!!


    Awesome!


  8. #545
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
    Gessner has already ruled on this. This is for appeal only. I wonder if Gessner is regretting that decision at this point.


  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:


  10. #546
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    149
    heads will rolll.........sit down boz you are making it worse.........

    This guy has nothing but the truth at hand here!!!!!!!!! invested in truth only.


  11. The Following User Says Thank You to BeBeBru For This Useful Post:


  12. #547
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfpackWoman View Post
    This expert's opinion was not that the hacking occurred via the VPN. He just said that was one of the mistakes that the CPD made. Allowing it to be connected to the VPN, and automatic functions changed files. He didn't say that's where the tampering came from.
    Regardless, the evidence was tampered with. The deleted Google maps cookie was a faked file. The state of the files changed after being taken into possession of LE and before any forensic examination. The evidence has no integrity. That's the bottom line.


  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  14. #548
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    just beyond infinity
    Posts
    238
    the royal WE, because I am a company....LOL.. not discrediting this witness.
    Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)


  15. #549
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    814
    Why did the Pros not use Gilmore on this? Wasn't he a Wake County Asset?

    Oops! He was. Now with RMA. Duh.


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:


  17. #550
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,941
    He's been consumed by this case....oh brother....he definitely posts here, right??
    IMO


  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Amster For This Useful Post:


  19. #551
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by kljohnson0458 View Post
    Well there ya go. BII. I guess the defense can rest now. Glad to be on the ground now.
    The jury will not see this testimony. JG already excluded it.


  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:


  21. #552
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,815
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    Gessner has already ruled on this. This is for appeal only. I wonder if Gessner is regretting that decision at this point.
    Oh, ok. I'm getting very confused. Can he change his decision?


  22. The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  23. #553
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
    Proffered on the record only for purposes of requesting an appeal, testimony will not make it to this jury.


  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:


  25. #554
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,815
    Quote Originally Posted by johnfear View Post
    Come on, Boz. You can DO this. Ask just one wrong question so the judge can (at his discretion) allow this back into the defense.

    Come on......
    I didn't understand this comment before. Now I get it.


  26. The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:


  27. #555
    Quote Originally Posted by jrb0124 View Post
    Regardless, the evidence was tampered with. The deleted Google maps cookie was a faked file. The state of the files changed after being taken into possession of LE and before any forensic examination. The evidence has no integrity. That's the bottom line.
    Absolutely. I'm just cutting off the discussion others were having that said "Oh, CPD or neighbors couldn't have hacked it, because it was coming through the VPN."


  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:


Page 37 of 78 FirstFirst ... 27 35 36 37 38 39 47 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 04-20-2011
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1039
    Last Post: 04-21-2011, 09:47 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper 04-18-2011
    By borndem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 740
    Last Post: 04-19-2011, 12:21 PM
  3. State v. Bradley Cooper 4-7-2011
    By hotpinkstef in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 733
    Last Post: 04-08-2011, 02:58 PM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper 03-30-2011
    By less0305 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 664
    Last Post: 03-31-2011, 10:30 AM
  5. State v Bradley Cooper 3.11.2011
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 08:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •