1276 users online (262 members and 1014 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 33 of 33 FirstFirst ... 23 31 32 33
Results 481 to 487 of 487
  1. #481
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    LINY
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by The Nomad View Post
    I'm not sure the dolls have anything to do with the SK, my view is its nothing more than a shrine gift. More than likely someone read about the story in the MSM and decided to pay the site a visit when they were in the area. Its quite common. At least in Europe it is.
    I can go with the shrine-gift theory. But they are significant and should never be completely dismissed as a red herring, maybe call it a pink herring.

  2. #482
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2
    seriously?

  3. #483
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Southern US
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Kali&89 View Post
    What about PH's alleged reference to a "Home for wayward girls" during his phone call to Shannon Gilberts mother. Could the" home for wayward girls" be the burial ground?
    Wow! I would definitely say that the verbiage "home for wayward girls", alone gives a definitive "age" range to the LISK. Late 50's-early 70's though more likely in the mid to late 60's in my opinion.

    I would place his age range at the time of the call to a generation or two prior to my own (so in his late 50-mid-60's or even early 70's now). I say that because the generation or two prior to my own generation would be the ones who would still utilize such verbiage/terms. No one generally in my own age range was still using the terms "home for wayward girls", as girl's & boy's homes, as such, that were previously popular ways to deal with troubled youth were going out of fashion; the system/parents/general treatment social work/mental health views related to referring teens to them, went out of style for whatever reason (I'd say back in the 90's there were far fewer of them around), be it due to private finance/funding drying up due to liability issues, etc., a general move away from girls & boys 'homes', and more toward the more modern outpatient hospital/behavioral treatment facility settings, then it swung back to more mix gender psychiatric treatment facilities in/out patient treatment versus up rooting juveniles and sending them off away from their parents/familiar environments, etc to live for months at a time in a supervised treatment facility/home (& juvenile incarceration grew)..my own generation saw teens sent off to places like 'such and such house'..versus calling them a girl's home & they were in/out patient treatment facilities that were in-state local to the teen...not hundreds of miles to different States away....

    The 'home for wayward youth'...
    while there are still places out there that would fall under that criteria & court systems that still use the term or similar, for places for girl's/boy's homes (ex: Indiana I believe), however, the locations to which they refer are more juvenile prisons than what was in the past referred to as a youth home (per watching some juvenile justice programs about Indiana Thanks to Nat'l Geo & the IN Supreme Court allowing behind the scenes access to actual juvenile cases)...

    As always, just my humble opinion, partially because I had a friend back in the 90's that was looking to place her teen in a girl/boy's home and there were only 3 that I was able to locate..& most troubled teens whom I knew growing up, were instead sent for treatment to places like 'XYZ House', which was an in/outpatient behavioral treatment facility, not what was once a home for wayward youth...a VERY interesting turn of phrase in my mind...you know "forensic linguistics" became a "thing" after the Unabomber case where the FBI utilized linguistics to help profile, narrow down geographically, and determine where he rec'd his thesis/college training etc based upon his sentence structure, and specific phrases, etc., & to catch, the Unabomber...makes me go "Hum"...or perhaps it is a phrase still used geographically in the NY area, still not likely by anyone in their 30's/40's or even early 50's!..


    The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!
    The TRUTH WILL OUT & THERE WILL BE A RECKONING, in this Life or the Next!!!

  4. #484
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    10,309
    Quote Originally Posted by curiosityscat View Post
    Wow! I would definitely say that the verbiage "home for wayward girls", alone gives a definitive "age" range to the LISK. Late 50's-early 70's though more likely in the mid to late 60's in my opinion.

    I would place his age range at the time of the call to a generation or two prior to my own (so in his late 50-mid-60's or even early 70's now). I say that because the generation or two prior to my own generation would be the ones who would still utilize such verbiage/terms. No one generally in my own age range was still using the terms "home for wayward girls", as girl's & boy's homes, as such, that were previously popular ways to deal with troubled youth were going out of fashion; the system/parents/general treatment social work/mental health views related to referring teens to them, went out of style for whatever reason (I'd say back in the 90's there were far fewer of them around), be it due to private finance/funding drying up due to liability issues, etc., a general move away from girls & boys 'homes', and more toward the more modern outpatient hospital/behavioral treatment facility settings, then it swung back to more mix gender psychiatric treatment facilities in/out patient treatment versus up rooting juveniles and sending them off away from their parents/familiar environments, etc to live for months at a time in a supervised treatment facility/home (& juvenile incarceration grew)..my own generation saw teens sent off to places like 'such and such house'..versus calling them a girl's home & they were in/out patient treatment facilities that were in-state local to the teen...not hundreds of miles to different States away....

    The 'home for wayward youth'...
    while there are still places out there that would fall under that criteria & court systems that still use the term or similar, for places for girl's/boy's homes (ex: Indiana I believe), however, the locations to which they refer are more juvenile prisons than what was in the past referred to as a youth home (per watching some juvenile justice programs about Indiana Thanks to Nat'l Geo & the IN Supreme Court allowing behind the scenes access to actual juvenile cases)...

    As always, just my humble opinion, partially because I had a friend back in the 90's that was looking to place her teen in a girl/boy's home and there were only 3 that I was able to locate..& most troubled teens whom I knew growing up, were instead sent for treatment to places like 'XYZ House', which was an in/outpatient behavioral treatment facility, not what was once a home for wayward youth...a VERY interesting turn of phrase in my mind...you know "forensic linguistics" became a "thing" after the Unabomber case where the FBI utilized linguistics to help profile, narrow down geographically, and determine where he rec'd his thesis/college training etc based upon his sentence structure, and specific phrases, etc., & to catch, the Unabomber...makes me go "Hum"...or perhaps it is a phrase still used geographically in the NY area, still not likely by anyone in their 30's/40's or even early 50's!..


    The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!
    I totally agree with your analysis on this. I agree it hinted to his age at the time he said it.

    If I had to guess how old he is now I am guessing he is likely already over 70 at this point. Im basing that on the phrase being used at the time when he made the call and I agree and think that phrase was more common in the mid 50s to mid 60s. Maybe the very early 70s at the latest but after that then that phrase died down. So if he picked that phrase up from living during those years then he would have had to have gotten some age on him by now.

    We dont know how old he may have been during the 50s and 60s when he picked up the phrase but he would have had to have been at least in his twenties if not older to pick up the jargon. So by the time he made that call he had the phrase stuck with him and was likely already gaining in years himself.

    And by now it puts him past 70 easily I believe.

  5. #485
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    1
    I'll start out pointing some already known facts and then I'll proceed to try to tie 'em up, creating then a profile and a group of risk for his victims.

    -First of all, some of the victims had a feet and/or hand removed, whether it is along with the rest of the limb or not.

    -Some of them have been found and others not.

    -John doe who was a male, but that was dressed as a female, was just killed with blunt-force trauma, and wasn't violated in any way.

    -A majority of them were prostitutes, and some others could possibly be.

    -People who have a feet fetish, usually get aroused by hands and vice versa, it might have some preference over one or another, but it usually get aroused by both, but why? Cause Hands and feet have a lot of similarities, like: nails, fingers, a different skin texture on the palm/sole when compared with the other side, same bone structure(take a look at the anatomy bones of the feet/ankle and wrist/hand and you'll see what im talking about), tendons appearing when you move 'em, and some other subtle details.Those similarities which may explain why those two seemingly fetishes walk side by side. And those characteristics are really subtle, but are capable of teasing somebody's mind, this is what fetish is, but all of it are generalized in a feet/hand fetish.

    -Feet fetish usually is connected with some submissive fetish, because of the symbolism involved in being at someone's feet.

    -Some people enjoy sexual intercourse with other people who are alive(majority of us), and some other enjoy having a sexual intercourse with dead people.

    So, I believe that LISK is a Male, probably white, straight, not a pedophile, necrophilic feet/hand fetishist
    .
    Who has a sort of Necrophilic feet/hand fetish, I mean, he probably like the usual stuff of podolatry/quirophilia, like licking, kissing, cumming, touching, but with feet/hand of dead women. I believe that the limbs were found in separate locations from the body cause he would remove them for either a fetish purpose of liking the amputated member or for the convenience on the handling, carrying and hiding of the limb, and the discard it cause it wasn't useful anymore or because he couldnt keep it indefinitedly, but it would take a time between the murder, butchering, usage for sexual purposes and discarding of the limbs and for this reason they were found separetly.
    This one is sick, but he could've had removed the heads to put them "staring" at him from "above" while he worshiped their feets or hands. This one is an almost delusional especulation, but it was the only way I could explain why he removed their heads, better explanations are really welcome.
    He is probably a Male for 2 main reasons: Most part of serial killers are males, so statistically its the most probable and because feet/hand fetish(especially a lesbian kind of it) are not commonly seem on females.
    I'm guessing he is white cause I usually find those fetishes more in white men, the reason for that, I don't know.
    He is straight, John doe was killed probably because he fooled LISK, who believed he was really a woman, asians have androgynous traits, and they probably met at night, which helped LISK to not notice, LISK could be under the effects of some drug, and he has no trouble killing at all, when he found out that it was man, he got mad and killed john doe with some weapon like a rock, an iron bar or even his hands, depending on how big he is.And he didn't violate the body, neither mutilated it, cause he is an heterosexual, a necrophilic heterosexual, so he has no interest in males, dead or alive.
    He is not a pedophile either, cause he let jane doe's no.3 baby untouched, no interest at all too, she probably was murdered cause he had to erase the traces.
    Any person who has a hand/feet fetish has some preference, whether it is the sole, the size, the shape of the nail, etc. He probably is not different, so if we can determine what is the common trait on their hands/feet we will probably be able to determine which of them were killed by him. Cause he probably seeks an specific type of hand/feet. For this we would need the photos of their hands and feet which is almost impossible cause its probably in the restricted police files.
    I strongly believe that he didn't kill the ones who were not mutilated, and he didn't kill the males, besides john doe who he thought it was a female.
    The "group of risk" in here does not include males of any age, elder people of any sex and female kids. He doesn't seem to make any distinction between races, a proof of it is that were found white females, jane doe no.3 who is black, john doe who LISK thought it was an asian, and cherries who possibly was hispanic.
    Basically the "group of risk" is females with ages ranging between 15-40, what we could call females on a sexual active age, they could be of any race, and not necessarily a prostitute.


    I really hopes this helps somehow, specially the feet fetish theory.

  6. #486
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Mount Vernon, NY
    Posts
    409
    I never thought about that before! You nailed it. That's a term my grandmother (who'd now be in her 80's, may she rest in peace) would use. Like, "a home for wayward girls" to her would be a home for teenage girls who were unmarried but pregnant.

    This link: http://myinwood.net/inwoods-old-magdalen-asylum/ states:
    "Since establishing itself in lower Manhattan in the 1830’s, the Magdalen Society’s sole purpose had been rescuing women from lives of prostitution and vice—sometimes, quite literally, kidnapping them from brothels."



    Quote Originally Posted by curiosityscat View Post
    Wow! I would definitely say that the verbiage "home for wayward girls", alone gives a definitive "age" range to the LISK. Late 50's-early 70's though more likely in the mid to late 60's in my opinion.

    I would place his age range at the time of the call to a generation or two prior to my own (so in his late 50-mid-60's or even early 70's now). I say that because the generation or two prior to my own generation would be the ones who would still utilize such verbiage/terms. No one generally in my own age range was still using the terms "home for wayward girls", as girl's & boy's homes, as such, that were previously popular ways to deal with troubled youth were going out of fashion; the system/parents/general treatment social work/mental health views related to referring teens to them, went out of style for whatever reason (I'd say back in the 90's there were far fewer of them around), be it due to private finance/funding drying up due to liability issues, etc., a general move away from girls & boys 'homes', and more toward the more modern outpatient hospital/behavioral treatment facility settings, then it swung back to more mix gender psychiatric treatment facilities in/out patient treatment versus up rooting juveniles and sending them off away from their parents/familiar environments, etc to live for months at a time in a supervised treatment facility/home (& juvenile incarceration grew)..my own generation saw teens sent off to places like 'such and such house'..versus calling them a girl's home & they were in/out patient treatment facilities that were in-state local to the teen...not hundreds of miles to different States away....

    The 'home for wayward youth'...
    while there are still places out there that would fall under that criteria & court systems that still use the term or similar, for places for girl's/boy's homes (ex: Indiana I believe), however, the locations to which they refer are more juvenile prisons than what was in the past referred to as a youth home (per watching some juvenile justice programs about Indiana Thanks to Nat'l Geo & the IN Supreme Court allowing behind the scenes access to actual juvenile cases)...

    As always, just my humble opinion, partially because I had a friend back in the 90's that was looking to place her teen in a girl/boy's home and there were only 3 that I was able to locate..& most troubled teens whom I knew growing up, were instead sent for treatment to places like 'XYZ House', which was an in/outpatient behavioral treatment facility, not what was once a home for wayward youth...a VERY interesting turn of phrase in my mind...you know "forensic linguistics" became a "thing" after the Unabomber case where the FBI utilized linguistics to help profile, narrow down geographically, and determine where he rec'd his thesis/college training etc based upon his sentence structure, and specific phrases, etc., & to catch, the Unabomber...makes me go "Hum"...or perhaps it is a phrase still used geographically in the NY area, still not likely by anyone in their 30's/40's or even early 50's!..


    The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!

  7. #487
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Southern US
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by jessr927 View Post
    I never thought about that before! You nailed it. That's a term my grandmother (who'd now be in her 80's, may she rest in peace) would use. Like, "a home for wayward girls" to her would be a home for teenage girls who were unmarried but pregnant.

    This link: http://myinwood.net/inwoods-old-magdalen-asylum/ states:
    "Since establishing itself in lower Manhattan in the 1830’s, the Magdalen Society’s sole purpose had been rescuing women from lives of prostitution and vice—sometimes, quite literally, kidnapping them from brothels."
    Exactly! Back further generations (3-4+) prior to my own (likely your grand mother's generation & prior, may she rest in peace & my condolences), the reference would absolutely have been to a place they sent unwed mothers (to have their kids, then have the kids taken away/adopted, before being able to return home), to get rid of their "problem", out of the way & eyes of 'polite society'....and as terminology does, it changed over the 'ages', and went almost completely out of style & use by my own generation. I might use it, but I love antiquated verbiage and if I did use it, someone my own age would look at me sideways, and I'd likely have to explain what the heck I meant..*winks*...Good point on your side.

    I'm pretty sure (after watching a series on the Unabomber on Netflix, and the FBI's development of verbal linguistics, as a valid profiling technique), that LE has already considered the LISK's phrasing in their profiling...*shrugs*...the prior post was my 1st time hearing/seeing reference to the exact term used (I haven't listened to any call recordings or transcripts), so it was like a lightening bolt when I heard/saw it!

    As always, my sympathies & condolences to the many families, and I hope LE finally stops, captures, & places him behind bars! Before age & infirmity catches up to him & gives him an escape from justice!


    The TRUTH WILL OUT!, and There will be a Reckoning, in this Life or the Next!
    The TRUTH WILL OUT & THERE WILL BE A RECKONING, in this Life or the Next!!!

Page 33 of 33 FirstFirst ... 23 31 32 33


Similar Threads

  1. NC-4th grader and others charged with making weapons out of markers
    By peeples in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-26-2011, 03:39 PM
  2. A Psychological 'Prostitute' of Beauty...
    By angelwngs in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 11-01-2006, 03:07 AM

Tags for this Thread