Page 10 of 110 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 60 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 1646
  1. #136
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    11,532
    Quote Originally Posted by NCEast View Post
    Kurtz is covering so much already I don't know what's going to be left for Trenkle to address.
    That's right. Cannot imagine what Trenkle will speak about.

    *On a side note, I am not at all impressed with Kurtz argument. JMO
    **May God Watch Over All Missing and Abused Children**


  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LaLaw2000 For This Useful Post:


  3. #137
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    26
    I'm not sure that Kurtz needs to go so far as to suggest that someone dropped files on BC's computer. He's already proven reasonable doubt. Pushing it that far makes it look like a reach.


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to huck22 For This Useful Post:


  5. #138
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeleine74 View Post
    This is almost identical to his opening.

    RE-RUN!
    I rewatched his opening this past weekend and the trial played out almost to the letter to what he stated in his opening.


  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to metafizik For This Useful Post:


  7. #139
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    734
    He is stretching on this google search. He can never take that from anyone's mind.


  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kljohnson0458 For This Useful Post:


  9. #140
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    At least we finally got to see the search.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:


  11. #141
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,213
    Quote Originally Posted by huck22 View Post
    I'm not sure that Kurtz needs to go so far as to suggest that someone dropped files on BC's computer. He's already proven reasonable doubt. Pushing it that far makes it look like a reach.
    But he's probably counting on the jury not to know any better.


  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NCEast For This Useful Post:


  13. #142
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Garner, NC
    Posts
    540
    Listening to Kurtz try to explain that if someone was looking at the google map of the area of fielding drive would not indicate someone was trying to look for a place to put a body. I think he has said invalid timestamps like 15 times..

    I am not believing any of this, using common sense you can totally think to yourself blah blah blah he still searched there and you can't change that dude!


  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CrimeAddict For This Useful Post:


  15. #143
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    Quote Originally Posted by kljohnson0458 View Post
    He is stretching on this google search. He can never take that from anyone's mind.
    I have always thought the FBI was good at what they did, but what a brilliant move to plant a Google search on Brad's work computer...Not sure if I would of thought of that!


  16. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Palomine For This Useful Post:


  17. #144
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by huck22 View Post
    I'm not sure that Kurtz needs to go so far as to suggest that someone dropped files on BC's computer. He's already proven reasonable doubt. Pushing it that far makes it look like a reach.
    His witness, GM who has done forensic analysis on over 400 computers believes the invalid deleted cookie and watermark and invalid time stamps are indicative of a dropped file.


  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sunshine05 For This Useful Post:


  19. #145
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    That visual for the jury speaks volumes.


  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:


  21. #146
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by Palomine View Post
    I have always thought the FBI was good at what they did, but what a brilliant move to plant a Google search on Brad's work computer...Not sure if I would of thought of that!
    Durham police detective.


  22. #147
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,213
    Quote Originally Posted by ncsu95 View Post
    That visual for the jury speaks volumes.
    I wish we could have seen these during testimony.


  23. #148
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,291
    wral WRAL NEWS in NC
    Kurtz: Brad's computer was tampered with. #coopertrial


  24. #149
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    11,532
    Time is up, Kurtz!
    **May God Watch Over All Missing and Abused Children**


  25. The Following User Says Thank You to LaLaw2000 For This Useful Post:


  26. #150
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by LaLaw2000 View Post
    Time is up, Kurtz!
    The defense has 2 hours. That doesn't mean Kurtz is limited to 1 hour. It's 2 hours total.


Page 10 of 110 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 60 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State v Bradley Cooper 4/14/11
    By hotpinkstef in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 893
    Last Post: 04-15-2011, 10:07 AM
  2. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/28/11
    By SleuthyGal in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 912
    Last Post: 03-29-2011, 10:14 AM
  3. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/25/11
    By Cheyenne130 in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 1081
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 09:26 AM
  4. State v Bradley Cooper - 3/24/11
    By Salem in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 667
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 09:51 AM
  5. Found Deceased State v Bradley Cooper - 3/23/11
    By jmflu in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 676
    Last Post: 03-24-2011, 09:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •