View Poll Results: Did the State prove its case against Bradley Cooper?

Voters
99. You may not vote on this poll
  • BC is guilty and the State proved their case

    40 40.40%
  • BC is guilty but the State did NOT prove their case

    30 30.30%
  • BC is innocent but the State will prevail

    0 0%
  • BC is innocent and the State did not prove otherwise.

    29 29.29%
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Did the State prove their case? LIST ONLY

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    20,222

    Did the State prove their case? LIST ONLY

    This thread will be open after closing arguments. Posting early so peeps can think about their answer before voting and commenting.

    This is not a debate thread but a vote and leave a comment thread.
    If there are other options you would like to see, please let us know before the thread is opened.
    Last edited by JBean; 05-03-2011 at 09:50 AM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to JBean For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,433
    I voted guilty but not proven.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    221
    I think he is guilty and the state proved it, despite themselves.

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to calgary123 For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,246
    Guilty - they provided proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
    It's my own two cents. You don't have to read or like it.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to less0305 For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NC Coast
    Posts
    1,353
    The State did not prove their case beyong a reasonable doubt. Still wonder about a hung jury though.

    Kelly

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    20
    I voted guilty but not proven but I think he will be found guilty.

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,221
    GUILTY!

    Google search has no innocent explanation and was not planted or tampered with.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Madeleine74 For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    62
    The state proved to me, CPD, nor anyone else tampered with the computer.
    Guilty

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RPD For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    26
    Probably guilty, but if I was a member of the jury, it would easily be NG. LE and the prosecution butchered what could have been an open-and-shut case.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to huck22 For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,245
    The State did prove their case.
    premeditation

    JUSTICE for Nancy

    Guilty of 1st degree murder
    "The dead cannot cry out for justice; it is a duty of the living to do so for them."
    ★★★★★ ღ♥Lois McMaster Bujold♥ღ ★★★★★

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sailor Bug For This Useful Post:


  19. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,720
    I came into this trial believing BC guilty. But, as the trial progressed, I wasn't sure the State had given enough circumstantial evidence. I really was undecided until today.

    I wasn't sure I could say this at the end, I do feel the State proved their case. Whether he'll be found guilty, it's anyone's guess.

    I have seen a LOT of criticism of the pros, but I thought they did just fine. Sometimes the pros spoke painfully slow, but I guess that's just how he is. It's what's in the words that count. I also believe his closing presentation was factual and powerful. Just because some people would have said MORE or whatever, didn't mean his was wrong. Just not the same approach.

    JMHO
    fran

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fran For This Useful Post:


  21. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    11,269
    I voted guilty, and I think the jury will have a verdict sometime tomorrow. I would think the map search of Fielding Drive would be a hard thing for any jury to overlook.
    **May God Watch Over All Missing and Abused Children**

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LaLaw2000 For This Useful Post:


  23. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    562
    I came into this trial without an opinion as to his innocence or guilt. Walking out of it with 99.9% certainty of his innocence. All of the physical evidence demonstrated that he was innocent. Add to that Occam's Razor, and there is no way this should have ever gone to trial.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oenophile For This Useful Post:


  25. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    183
    I live nearby and came here believing BC was guilty based on news reports. I still believe he is 'probably' guilty but do not believe the state has proven their case.

    That said, we saw a different trial than the jury did in this case so I'm not sure where they jury will land. I'm guessing they'll hang.

    If BC is found guilty I believe he stands a pretty good chance of winning a new trial.

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bloghooligan For This Useful Post:


  27. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Without looking at any more detail, I voted guilty but did not prove. I would of felt better about the states case if they were better at closing to tie everything together. I don't think they did.

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  29. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Garner, NC
    Posts
    540
    They proved his guilt, by the skin of their teeth.

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CrimeAddict For This Useful Post:


  31. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    299
    Before the trial, I had no opinion G or NG in this case beyond knowing that the husband or BF is the murderer more often than any other single category (e.g. friend, stranger, other family members), but far less often than all other categories.

    Since I am still on the fence, my vote was Not Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and therefore still Presumed Innocent. Somewhat frustrated that the poll did not allow for this option.

    This case, by itself, raises many issues that regularly threaten our legal and Constitution rights. At its core is the right to a fair trial, defendants rights including Brady, concept of real evidence in a virtual world, and how woefully equipped are our public institutions, our judges, attorneys, our law enforcement, members of the press, elected officials, and ordinary citizens.

    Consider how difficult it already is to evaluate electronic evidence in forensic investigations -- whether provable beyond a reasonable doubt or not. Step back from the Cooper trial, look at the problems from a wider view, and use your common sense. Can you tell the difference between a valid piece of electronic evidence from one that is faked, modified, planted, doctored, or otherwise not what it claims to be? Could a jury if you were on trial?

    One can suddenly face huge problems with little more than a Shockwave Flash (SWF) delivered to your browser via an email, an ad hosted by a compromised site, or with the SWF attack code embedded in a PDF file embeded in an Excel workbook embedded in a Word document. And on and on.

    For this example, suppose you are browsing your favorite real crime site, searching other sites to look at related topics, and one of these sites displays images hosted by a hacked site. That SWF is really a program that executes unseen within your browser session, able to "browse" the web exactly as if done by you but without displaying anything.

    Suppose this program downloaded kiddie porn, maybe found and used your credit card info to sign you up for special services, and even used the laptop camera to take the picture of you in your underwear propped up in bed. (Don't worry, your security settings will be set back just like they were.)

    If we were a juror, would we have any doubt of the defendant's guilt?

    If we were the defendant, could any of us prove that we were innocent?

  32. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to unc70 For This Useful Post:


  33. #18
    I think they proved their case completely.The google map isn't the only thing that shows Brad did it to me.

  34. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    good old europe
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by TigressPen View Post
    I think they proved their case completely.The google map isn't the only thing that shows Brad did it to me.
    I voted guilty but no proof.

    The post from unc70 pretty much sums it up for me.

  35. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    29,052
    It appears this case will be a close call. Interesting.

    Salem

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Salem For This Useful Post:

    kai

  37. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    22
    I voted guilty, but the state did not prove their case. 60% of me thinks he's guilty largely because of the statistical evidence detailed by unc70,and the lack of viable alternatives, but I would need to be far more certain than 60% to return a guilty verdict. The state didn't prove their case, in small part because of their own ineptitude (inexplicably not securing the PCs, cellphones, etc..as evidence), but mostly because the physical evidence was just not there, something for which no one is really to blame.

  38. #22
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2
    I need more concrete evidence before I would vote to send a person to prison for the rest of his life; or even 25 to 30 years! I concede that he 'likely' did it, but the State failed miserably in proving he did it.

  39. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    7,985
    Guilty and Proven beyond a reasonable doubt!

  40. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,338
    Not Guilty.

    Google search doesn't matter whether real or planted because he did not spoof the phone call and NC went running that morning.
    Hoisted with his own Petard

  41. #25
    Not Guilty. The instructions to the jury stated that, for a Guilty vote, one needed to be "entirely convinced" that the defendant did the crime. I am not. And since our system presumes innocence until proven guilty, I voted BC is innocent.
    "I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw

Similar Threads

  1. State releases Subpoena List, includes LA,CA and GA
    By Searchfortruth in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 10:36 PM
  2. State of Florida's Motion to Strike Defense Witness List
    By jnTexas in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-30-2009, 08:20 PM
  3. State Witness List
    By JayBee1940 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-19-2008, 02:21 PM
  4. Contact List..by state
    By Timex in forum A CALL TO ACTION! Calif. DMH Illegally Releases 17,000 Sex Offenders
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-25-2006, 12:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •