2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE Evening Session

Patty G · May 13, 2011

If court is still in session at 5:00 PM, this thread will then open.

Patty G · May 13, 2011

Bumping Up

Blue Jackets fan · May 13, 2011

Hello!!!!!!!

sleutherontheside · May 13, 2011

Made it in.

USARDOG · May 13, 2011

Nite all, time to go home and "let fly the dogs of war"... Ok, there only puppies but they do make it seem like war sometimes!

2goldfish · May 13, 2011

hello my fellow ws'ers! :loveyou:

21merc7 · May 13, 2011

Whew, this has been some trip we are traveling on. :rollercoaster:

Patty G · May 13, 2011

Thank you all for coming over while court is in recess.

You guys have been so great all day making it so much easier to moderate the threads today.

Misha sends you all some cookies and lots of :blowkiss:

alwaysonmymind · May 13, 2011

Does anyone have a screen shot of the laptop with WS on?? :floorlaugh:

gitana1 · May 13, 2011

Bringing over from last thread:

TotallyObsessed said:
OK OK OK....everybody calm down about the "juror".....she isn't even on the final panel yet, right? Won't the state be able to strike her without cause.....? I mean, games not over yet, right??????????????????? Lawyers? Anybody?

No. She is on. JA tried to use his peremptory or strike without case, it was objected to and sustained which I have NEVER seen before. She is the first juror we know is on the panel, as far as I am concerned. JA failed to question her more or use a challenge for cause first which was a big mistake. They are talking about this on the news.

21merc7 said:
Right!

Wrong.

Kentjbkent said:
I am getting VERY confused....

Does the State still have the option to STRIKE this juror under ANY circumstance?

Keep seeing it referred to as "juror is DEFINITELY on jury now"

"State will have to use 1 of 10 strikes"

"SA blew it"

Is she DEFINITELY going to be sat on jury?

They did try to strike without case and it was objected to and sustained.

Leila said:
I think the state will use one of their 10 dismissals to dismiss her.

Already did. It did not work.

PAXIMUS said:
I think youre getting way ahead of yourself.

Nope.

GiantPickle said:
i am not as worried about her as others - I think she'll just sit quiet and not ask questions and just kinda go with the flow. she didn't sound to me like a "critical thinker"...I think she'll just zone out....hear the basics (didn't report the baby missing) and vote with the group.

I pray you are right!!!!!!!!! But my lawyer instinct is very concerned. I feel a tiny bit sick.

Zoe Bogart said:
She may not be a main juror. She may become an alternate. If an alternate, she may never have any say in the final judgment.

The first ones to be seated are the ones on the main jury. Then, they select alternates.

2goldfish said:
someone please, please correct me if I am wrong but I was under the impression that JA tried to do just that and HHJP said he may not, because JB claimed it was because of her race. which means she is DEFINITELY on the jury. yes or no? anyone?

You are right.

luckyme · May 13, 2011

did last guy make it in?

drip~drop · May 13, 2011

How come Mason thought tomorrow was a 1/2 day?

Maybe these folks should bring a change of clothes with them from now on.
Jammies.
imo
__________________
(brought from closed thread)

Leila · May 13, 2011

I'm here............but going to take a quick break for something to drink before they come back.......I've got a question. What did HHMP mean by the word, "Back Strike?"

Blue Jackets fan · May 13, 2011

Now what is going on????

Amster · May 13, 2011

HHJP is certainly syrupy sugar sweet to CM.....

mydailyopinions · May 13, 2011

Can anyone point me to anything Brad Conway has said that has broken his client/attorney privilege to George and Cindy?

TakeNote · May 13, 2011

can you all give live links on this page....it makes it easier when someone is just joining

im not on my reg computer so i dont have them saved

sleutherontheside · May 13, 2011

Can someone PM me some Pepto...this ride has made my tummy hurt.

amydlite · May 13, 2011

Okay, so the last PJ....Does the law require one to consider age as a mitigating factor or what? I understand why the DT would want someone to consider that, but do not understand why him saying he doesn't think age should be a factor should get him booted. Can anyone explain that to me? Thanks

Blue Jackets fan · May 13, 2011

drip~drop said:
How come Mason thought tomorrow was a 1/2 day?

Maybe these folks should bring a change of clothes with them from now on.
Jammies.
imo
__________________
(brought from closed thread)

Hey we need to have a full strengh jury buy saturday even if it menas staying unitl 2am IMO.

2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE Evening Session

Retired WS Staff

Retired WS Staff

New Member

Retired WS Staff

New Member

Active Member

New Member

Retired WS Staff

Well-Known Member

Verified Attorney

New Member

kiss a fuzzie

Active Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Mother to little post it my boy wonder & Founding

Retired WS Staff

Member

New Member

DNASolves

Online statistics

Forum statistics