Page 3 of 42 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 626
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    33,691
    Quote Originally Posted by WillenFan21 View Post
    So I am curious?? How do you guys think the defense will explain Roy Kronk obtaining Caylee's body to place it where it was found at?? I mean they are going to have to explain that one.... I don't believe it at all. They obviously did not think this through.
    IIRC, JB said they don't know or can't explain it. I don't remember the exact wording though.


  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuziQ For This Useful Post:


  3. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    19,037
    Just to be clear, I agree the Kronk-hides-the-body story is preposterous.

    But is it possible JB is just throwing it out in case it sticks? Some jurors may not want to face the possibility that a mother or grandparents had any part in a toddler's death. Introducing Kronk--even though it makes no sense--gives them somebody else on whom to focus.

    In true crimes shows on TV, I have heard jurors say they ignored the arguments of both sides and made up a completely different theory of the crime (which is their right).


  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  5. #33
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,172
    Anyone have an idea why RK is dragged into this so much? Just to show that the body was possibly moved and that's why nobody from Texas Equusearch or anyone but him found the remains. What does this matter anyway, if the main purpose of the trial is to determine if Casey did murder Caylee?


  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to allycat1208 For This Useful Post:


  7. #34
    DaughterAlice's Avatar
    DaughterAlice is offline ''I'm sorry if that sounds selfish, sweetie, but it's me! Me! Me! Me!''
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    512
    I think JB was wrong going in this direction.


  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to DaughterAlice For This Useful Post:


  9. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10,605
    You know I can see him going the accident route. Fine. Whatever. But to bring GA in muddied it, and then to say RK discarded the body made it even more ridiculous. This means, unless RK was driving ICA's car, they are still refuting the trunk evidence and smell witnesses. They've just made too many hurdles for themselves. They should have just said it was an accident, ICA was scared and whatever and not denied that Caylee was in the trunk..don't have to admit it but this way they are denying the insurmountable evidence.


  10. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:


  11. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    258
    I got lost when JB started in on RKronk. He said that RK moved the body, but from where to where - when to when never came out that I heard. It seemed as though JB got lost in his explanation as he became fixated with RK's desire to become rich with the reward money. This whole tale became very confusing and didn't ever go anywhere other than RK discovered the body after several attempts of reporting it. JB's point was totally lost by me, he seems to fixate on 'profit of monies' on a number of peoples testimony/depos. Anybody - comments please. I am still confused with this. TY


  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TakingALook For This Useful Post:


  13. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,081
    I think the jury is going to be disgusted with the defense... Roy is just part and parcel of that response. "No good deed goes unpunished" will become a dang mantra in their minds. KC and her team will be seen as unscrupulous. jmo


  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Quiche For This Useful Post:


  15. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    Posts
    6,836
    Quote Originally Posted by TakingALook View Post
    I got lost when JB started in on RKronk. He said that RK moved the body, but from where to where - when to when never came out that I heard. It seemed as though JB got lost in his explanation as he became fixated with RK's desire to become rich with the reward money. This whole tale became very confusing and didn't ever go anywhere other than RK discovered the body after several attempts of reporting it. JB's point was totally lost by me, he seems to fixate on 'profit of monies' on a number of peoples testimony/depos. Anybody - comments please. I am still confused with this. TY
    Baez said to us and the jury that we will never know were RK found Caylee. I quess we are to leave it at that and not ask why.The jury is sure to love that!


  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to RANCH For This Useful Post:


  17. #39
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,172
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiche View Post
    I think the jury is going to be disgusted with the defense... Roy is just part and parcel of that response. "No good deed goes unpunished" will become a dang mantra in their minds. KC and her team will be seen as unscrupulous. jmo
    "No good deed goes unpunished" is right! RK may have been a big greedy perhaps, but what's the point of bringing him into the limelight? Where is JB going with this? To explain why it took so long to find the remains? What difference does it make anyway? Mostly this trial is about figuring out if Caylee was murdured by Casey! Anyone have a clue?


  18. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to allycat1208 For This Useful Post:


  19. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    Posts
    6,836
    Quote Originally Posted by allycat1208 View Post
    "No good deed goes unpunished" is right! RK may have been a big greedy perhaps, but what's the point of bringing him into the limelight? Where is JB going with this? To explain why it took so long to find the remains? What difference does it make anyway? Mostly this trial is about figuring out if Caylee was murdured by Casey! Anyone have a clue?
    Baez and team are trying to cover all the negative evidence against ICA. So you get this ridicules theory of accidental death combined with RK being responsible for the way Caylee was discarded like trash.
    Last edited by RANCH; 05-24-2011 at 07:53 PM. Reason: spelling


  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to RANCH For This Useful Post:


  21. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    717
    For one thing if RK had found Caylee somewhere else, how would he have known that it was Caylee at all? Not saying that there are a lot of missing two year old all over town, but how would he know who she was and to put her in those woods? If he found her somewhere else it would have been just as legit to leave them there and call the police out to that place. Not drag them all over Orlando for months then dump them and move them several time as I think the DT was trying to indicate.


  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to fla*mom For This Useful Post:


  23. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,216
    Quote Originally Posted by RANCH View Post
    Baez said to us and the jury that we will never know were RK found Caylee. I quess we are to leave it at that and not ask why.The jury is sure to love that!
    So how does he know RK was the one who got it from where ever and put it in the woods to get the reward money. What about the car smell, wonder who drove the car around with the decomp body in it.

    Next when did the reward money come out, is this when RK went and got the body and hid it in the woods till he really needed it. Oh I see, he waited for Christmas time to reveal where the body was. Needed to buy Christmas gifts.

    OMG when JB started this line today I just laughed I was thinking I was watching TV like a soap opera.


  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to QueenD For This Useful Post:


  25. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    Posts
    6,836
    Quote Originally Posted by QueenD View Post
    So how does he know RK was the one who got it from where ever and put it in the woods to get the reward money. What about the car smell, wonder who drove the car around with the decomp body in it.

    Next when did the reward money come out, is this when RK went and got the body and hid it in the woods till he really needed it. Oh I see, he waited for Christmas time to reveal where the body was. Needed to buy Christmas gifts.

    OMG when JB started this line today I just laughed I was thinking I was watching TV like a soap opera.
    The car smell JB will say is from the garbage. Plus he will say that Dr Vass is a greedy inventor peddling junk science. RK theory is just plain stupid and wont go far IMO. Lets see if JB can convince the jury about the car odors.He will not fool me however.


  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RANCH For This Useful Post:


  27. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Between the beach and the river
    Posts
    6,552
    I would like to know what all the other DT lawyers think about adding the RK story.I just can't imagine they all agreed to this.
    Always ,just my opinion





    *****************************************
    We never saw it coming .Please talk to your teen even if you don't think you need to !
    Far more teens commit impulsive suicide without chronic depression
    Miss U James


  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MissJames For This Useful Post:


  29. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    599
    Quote Originally Posted by Kentjbkent View Post
    And better yet....

    Why didn't he "read the fine print"?


  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 4realtho For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 42 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Edward Turso testimony (OCSO-went to Suburban Dr. with Roy Kronk and saw skull)
    By wenwe4 in forum Witness Testimonies and Closing Arguments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-29-2011, 03:32 PM
  2. A Celebration of ROY M. KRONK
    By Tuba in forum Forensic Astrology Forum
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 06-28-2011, 10:40 PM
  3. Roy Kronk has to start paying legal bills to maintain privacy
    By Egoslayer in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 08:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •