1037 users online (233 members and 804 guests)  


Websleuths News

View Poll Results: Could a NG verdict forever change our system of justice?

Voters
194. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, if she gets a NG verdict anyone could get off of anything with enough money

    53 27.32%
  • No, our system will survive even this.

    115 59.28%
  • I think she is innocent and hope she gets off

    7 3.61%
  • Just don't know

    21 10.82%
Multiple Choice Poll.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 45
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Somewhere between Texas, KY and FL.
    Posts
    926

    Could a NG verdict forever change our system of justice?

    Mods please remove this thread if you feel it is not appropriate.

    Watching what I could of the opening statement by JB, was like watching the OJ trial on steroids IMO. So my question is this...

    Could a NG (Not Guilty) verdict forever change our system of justice? Could we as a Nation be forever change by the, "say anything, blame anyone, make up any outrageous lie and someone will buy it," defense?

    This statement is attributed to Adolph Hitler:
    If you make a lie big enough, and tell it often enough, people will believe it.

    Is this what we have come to as a Nation? Have endless episodes of CSI left us unable to tell truth from fiction? What say you?

    P.S. Thanks in advance for your input on this issue.
    Last edited by USARDOG; 05-25-2011 at 01:38 PM. Reason: Poor wording.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,990
    Perish the thought of a NG defense. Over the past three years, I've reviewed most of the documents in this case and I am thoroughly convinced of her guilt at this point. I can't see it going NG but IF it were to, YES we sorely need a change in our legal system. I blame this circus on the DT for creating it in the media (the Anthony's are not blameless either, but I'll cut them some slack since it appears they are now doing the right thing.) Thank G*d for the Sunshine Laws. We, the public, are entitled to an open policy. JMO

    I didn't vote because I didn't see a 'hope so.' The problem isn't with the system, per se, but the individuals who misuse it. MOO

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    the restaurant at the end of the universe
    Posts
    922
    We'll survive but I have been personally invested in this case as an observer for a long time and it would be devastating to me to see a not guilty or even a hung jury.

    I have doubts that the State would retry this case if there is a hung jury and will worry about that possibility every day until the verdict is read.

    Baez would never make the mistake of throwing the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall a second time, and if more than one juror has reasonable doubt I just don't think they will retry the case. It is what it is, the state will present what they have and Florida is in a huge budget crisis.

    I'm hoping that the State will bring it on home, but if a not guilty verdict is reached I will accept it as part of our system. It has its flaws but it's still the fairest system I know of.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    481
    Thanks for the interesting questions USARDog!

    I don't think that it's so much episodes of CSI that leave some unable to distinguish fiction from reality. Although, I do think that mass media has had a detrimental affect on society. I see it as, we have become a society of enablers and tend to excuse many bad behaviors due to someone's circumstances rather than hold them accountable for their choices and actions.

    I feel as a society as a whole, more emphasis is placed on a persons success rather than the quality of their character and moral values. No one seems to care about the path one takes to success, whether they lie cheat or steal, until there is a scandal and only then does there seem to be some outcry against the person or entity.

    That is just a brief point of view from my little corner of the world.

  5. #5
    ecs5298's Avatar
    ecs5298 is offline Founding Member of AFKBPOFPOPL & Hardwood Mulch King & Bacon Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    United States of Bacon
    Posts
    9,296
    If she's acquitted all it means to our justice system is that you can float any load of crap out there and at least one person will believe it. It's gonna give rise to all sorts of whacko defenses!

    ALIENS DID IT!
    ELVIS DID IT
    etc!

    When did logic and common sense fly out the window?
    "When it all goes down the crapper, don't come crying to me. You were warned" - ecs5298, November 6, 2012

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    952
    I didn't vote because I didn't know what to pick.

    I feel that if she gets off, that will give all compulsive lying, murdering, sociopathic "unusual" people like her hope.
    If there is a NG verdict, Casey wins again.. Casey has always won until Yuri Melich threw a monkey wrench in her game.
    There's no way the DT can actually believe her lies. She needs to be stopped! People like her need to be put to death.
    Before all this, I felt so sorry that Caylee never got to live her life.. Now I feel so much better that the little angel is someone better than with these "unusual" people

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    37,782
    I thought you meant a Nancy Grace verdict----that would be "Guilty" for sure...
    Just my opinion, of course.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    528
    What's the likilhood the state would retry the case if it ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury? Doesn't the prosecution usually have an advantage in re-trials since they now are aware of the defense strategy?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,358
    If they want to say she killed the child with chloroform, they better have her on tape buying the components. Even her parents noticed the pool ladder was amiss... Casey handled this badly, shes probably mentally ill, but the State needs to prove with out a DOUBT that this was murder, and I really think the jury will see she covered up an accidental death. Maybe a disposal of a corpse charge, which she would have time served.jmo

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,978
    baez did not find a jury of 12 +5 fools like he thinks he did. they will not acquit her.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,231
    Quote Originally Posted by cluciano63 View Post
    I thought you meant a Nancy Grace verdict----that would be "Guilty" for sure...
    OMG me too!!!! I was reading it as Nancy Grace for the first few lines.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    21,759
    Quote Originally Posted by USARDOG View Post
    Mods please remove this thread if you feel it is not appropriate.

    Watching what I could of the opening statement by JB, was like watching the OJ trial on steroids IMO. So my question is this...

    Could a NG verdict forever change our system of justice? Could we as a Nation be forever change by the, "say anything, blame anyone, make up any outrageous lie and someone will buy it," defense?

    This statement is attributed to Adolph Hitler:
    If you make a lie big enough, and tell it often enough, people will believe it.

    Is this what we have come to as a Nation? Have endless episodes of CSI left us unable to tell truth from fiction? What say you?

    P.S. Thanks in advance for your input on this issue.
    I voted no, but was wondering what Nancy Grace had to do with this? Not Guilty. I get it now.
    Media thread for Abby and Libby.


    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...5#post13163455

    WebSleuths Lingo thread.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...bsleuths-Lingo

    Unless I provide a link, every one of my posts are to be considered rumor, Speculation, or simply MY OWN OPINION.

    We are the watchers. We are witnesses. We see what has gone before. We see what happens now, at this dangerous moment in human history. We see what's going to happen - what will surely happen - unless we come together: we - the Peoples of all Nations - to restore peace and harmony and balance to the Earth, our Mother.


    THE IGNORE BUTTON IS YOUR FRIEND!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,769
    Yes, if she gets a NG verdict anyone could get off of anything with enough money
    If the verdict is NG, I don't think it will have anything to do with money or status. Taxpayers are paying for Casey's defense and she's just an average 25-year-old, not someone who was a celebrity or political figure prior to Caylee's disappearance.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    53
    A NG verdict simply means the state couldn't build a case. Their evidence is all circumstantial. All JB has to do is influence a few jurors with reasonable doubt. How that happens is immaterial to him.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,897
    I do believe that there is a different justice for the rich and/or influentual, I just don't believe that would apply in this case.
    "This Time We Get it Right!"

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary.
    For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." Stuart Chase

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. The Justice System Has Failed
    By Boodles in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 07-06-2011, 04:17 PM
  2. The Justice System and KC
    By JBean in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 01:35 AM
  3. NO Criminal Justice System in New Orleans ...
    By 13th Juror in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-06-2005, 09:16 PM