WillenFan21
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 6,545
- Reaction score
- 10,171
Mods,
I hope that this will be OK me posting this. I figure it may help others with the same questions. Maybe we could have a thread for trial questions and all? This is the first time I have ever watched a trial. I was fairly young when OJ went through his trial. I'm only 26 years old so I am not sure how old I would have been. Websleuths has taught me SOOO much about law and it starting to teach me about the trial process. A few questions I have are:
1. Will the Defense have witness and will the State be able to do the cross examination like JB is doing right now?
2. What does sustained mean? It means that the judge disagrees with the person asking questions right?
3. Overruled means that he agrees right?
4. Why do they have re-word their questions? I don't understand that.
5. Later on in the trial will they show pieces of evidence after they get done interviewing or do they interview and shoe the evidence at the same time? I just mean do they question people about the evidence like the chloroform they would go to the experts and stuff.
I am just trying to understand. I am fascinated by this stuff especially seeing my first trial and see how it goes. I want to be able to understand.
Thank you for all the help.
I hope that this will be OK me posting this. I figure it may help others with the same questions. Maybe we could have a thread for trial questions and all? This is the first time I have ever watched a trial. I was fairly young when OJ went through his trial. I'm only 26 years old so I am not sure how old I would have been. Websleuths has taught me SOOO much about law and it starting to teach me about the trial process. A few questions I have are:
1. Will the Defense have witness and will the State be able to do the cross examination like JB is doing right now?
2. What does sustained mean? It means that the judge disagrees with the person asking questions right?
3. Overruled means that he agrees right?
4. Why do they have re-word their questions? I don't understand that.
5. Later on in the trial will they show pieces of evidence after they get done interviewing or do they interview and shoe the evidence at the same time? I just mean do they question people about the evidence like the chloroform they would go to the experts and stuff.
I am just trying to understand. I am fascinated by this stuff especially seeing my first trial and see how it goes. I want to be able to understand.
Thank you for all the help.