Rallihanna
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
So what are everyone's guesses as to what their attorney's motion is?
Lippman filed a motion to be discussed on Tuesday 5/31/11
- Thread starter Rallihanna
- Start date
Whatever it is, the defense is objecting to it. :woohoo:
Kimster
Former Member
My wildest guess is that it has something to do with the defense accusing GA of abusing KC? Since there isn't any evidence to support that?
But I'm not sure they can file such a motion. That's a question I'd like to ask Mr. Hornsby on tomorrow's radio show.
But I'm not sure they can file such a motion. That's a question I'd like to ask Mr. Hornsby on tomorrow's radio show.
camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 4
I am thinking the same Kimster.....just the fact that JB used the words "could have".....made up by JB....not something ICA stated as a fact for the DT.....of course this is just MO....I have no clue as to the law.....
jen&jonhart
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 2
Could it be something to do with ga grand jury testimony? I think jb is trying to get ga for perjury.
Kimster
Former Member
From all the comments I've read by our esteemed verified attorneys here, grand jury testimony is sealed and cannot be released, even for perjury charges.
camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 4
did HCJP reside over the grand jury?
3doglady
Certified Coffeeaholic
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,724
- Reaction score
- 0
The attorneys on HLN have been saying that JB can accuse anyone of anything during opening statements if it helps his client's case. They said attorneys are given wide latitude and are not liable for what is said in court.
Pattymarie
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 2,102
- Reaction score
- 0
YES,If I remember correctly :twocents:
camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 4
But isn't it diff when he used the words "could have"......instead of stating it a fact? He is saying maybe this happend....not this "did" happen.....IMO if he stated that it "did" happen, this could be something that his client told him happened......seems to me like he is making this stuff up......
kwim? am I making any sense here?
I don't recall him saying that GA "could have" put his p**** in ICa's mouth - it sounded to me like he was stating that as a fact ....?
camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 4
Oh I need to go back and listen to JB .....I so hate doing this.....
BetteDavisEyes
Fasten your seatbelts...
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 35,310
- Reaction score
- 78,670
Why would the DT object to George's Grand Jury testimony? I thought they wanted to use for impeachment purposes. Whatever the motion is about is something to which the DT objected.
BigFatMommyDog
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,932
- Reaction score
- -25
Kimster, if you sneak over to his blog blawg blahg - you will find that a couple of us have already asked him to do so:innocent:
3doglady
Certified Coffeeaholic
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,724
- Reaction score
- 0
According to what I heard on HLN it doesn't matter whether he says it happened or insinuates it happened. The DT can accuse him of anything in court they want if it helps his client.
BetteDavisEyes
Fasten your seatbelts...
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 35,310
- Reaction score
- 78,670
That's how I recall it, too. JB said that Casey could have George's p**** in her mouth in the morning and then go to school and play with the other kids as if everything was normal. I think he said that this was when she was 13, so I doubt that 7th or 8th graders are actually "playing".