1395 users online (264 members and 1131 guests)  



Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914

    A quick bit of help

    Hey, folks. It's not often I ask for help, but in this case I'll take what I can get.

    I want to know as much as possible about the medical records that Dr. Beuf wouldn't give up. What eventually became of them? Were warrants issued? Did the police try to force them? Anything you can tell me, preferably from printed sources.

    Thanks in advance.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,563
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Hey, folks. It's not often I ask for help, but in this case I'll take what I can get.

    I want to know as much as possible about the medical records that Dr. Beuf wouldn't give up. What eventually became of them? Were warrants issued? Did the police try to force them? Anything you can tell me, preferably from printed sources.

    Thanks in advance.
    Check your PM
    “It saddens me that 20 years after my sister Nicole’s murder, we are still seeing the same crimes, just different names, over and over again.”
    - Denise Brown (sister of Nicole Brown Simpson)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,579
    Great question and one I would also like the answer to! Is the answer something that should not be posted in the forum? TIA.
    ___________________

    "This Time We Get It Right!"
    If you can read this, thank a teacher, if it's in English, thank a soldier!
    If I forget to mention it. Everything I post is my opinion, right or wrong, good or bad.
    If you have questions about Rebecca Zahaus death, please watch this:http://websleuths.com/forums/showpos...00&postcount=1

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Sorry to bother you again, guys. But now I need information on the cord fibers supposedly found in JB's bed. Were they ever confirmed?
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,953
    only here

    http://www.acandyrose.com/03312003carnes11-20.htm

    page 14

    Further,fibers consistent with those of the cord used to make the slip knots and garrote where found on Jonbenets bed.
    Ramsey case: "Instead of being the DNA of one person, they have instead created a composite of someone who does not exist. "

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Quote Originally Posted by madeleine View Post
    only here

    http://www.acandyrose.com/03312003carnes11-20.htm

    page 14

    Further,fibers consistent with those of the cord used to make the slip knots and garrote where found on Jonbenets bed.
    Thanks, maddie, but that's sort of my problem. The Carnes ruling stipulates so many things as fact that are NOT fact, I don't know what to think.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Let's change tack here. I've been in an argument with people trying to bring up that old dog about why the Ramseys would "unstage" the crime scene. I keep trying to tell them that they DIDN'T unstage it (at least, not in any meaningful way), but I'm not making any headway. Maybe I never will, but I won't give up. I keep thinking that it's my fault, that I'm not articulating it well enough. It happens.

    Anyone want to throw around ideas?
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Runnin' up that hill....
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Let's change tack here. I've been in an argument with people trying to bring up that old dog about why the Ramseys would "unstage" the crime scene. I keep trying to tell them that they DIDN'T unstage it (at least, not in any meaningful way), but I'm not making any headway. Maybe I never will, but I won't give up. I keep thinking that it's my fault, that I'm not articulating it well enough. It happens.

    Anyone want to throw around ideas?
    What do you mean? Do you mean that the Ramseys somehow deliberately interfered with evidence associated with the scene even though they were absolutely innocent.

    Or that the Ramseys moved objects so that the police would not possibly look at them as guilty even though they were innocent?
    Last edited by Let_Forever_Be; 06-12-2011 at 06:09 PM.
    William Wallace: They may take our lives, but they’ll never take our FREEDOM!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    7,960
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Let's change tack here. I've been in an argument with people trying to bring up that old dog about why the Ramseys would "unstage" the crime scene. I keep trying to tell them that they DIDN'T unstage it (at least, not in any meaningful way), but I'm not making any headway. Maybe I never will, but I won't give up. I keep thinking that it's my fault, that I'm not articulating it well enough. It happens.

    Anyone want to throw around ideas?
    SuperDave,

    mmm, a thorny issue this one. No unstaging might imply JonBenet was killed, wiped down, redressed, with ligature and restraints applied, and placed into the wine-cellar, all within the confines of the basement?

    Unstaging might apply if one participant realized some aspects of the staging might skew suspicion towards them, so unstaged certain elements e.g. sexual assault?

    Restaging might apply if a previous staging was seen as untenable e.g. a bedtime assault and death. Which is transformed into a kidnapping, which would require the prior staging to be cleaned up, essentially voided in case or whenever JonBenet was discovered?


    Then there is JR with his free time whilst Burke was on his way to Fleet's house, could he have unstaged or tweaked some crime-scene features, was it him that introduced the barbie-gown, thinking a nightgown would look better than white longjohns?

    Unstaging may have occurred, thats what the size-12's may represent, a detail Patsy appeared to be ignorant about since she lied around the topic?

    So I guess unstaging is a function of whichever is your favorite theory.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,579
    If by 'unstaging' you mean the fact that JR took the tape off JonBenets mouth, literally picked her up and carried her upstairs and Patsy lying on top of her body, I believe it was self preservation. A way to allow the transfer of the fibers found on JonBenets body. Undoing of potential damning evidence.

    Also, why did they make time for John to shower and change clothes, prior to the call to BPD, but not Patsy? The more answers you find, create additional questions.
    ___________________

    "This Time We Get It Right!"
    If you can read this, thank a teacher, if it's in English, thank a soldier!
    If I forget to mention it. Everything I post is my opinion, right or wrong, good or bad.
    If you have questions about Rebecca Zahaus death, please watch this:http://websleuths.com/forums/showpos...00&postcount=1


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Let_Forever_Be View Post
    What do you mean? Do you mean that the Ramseys somehow deliberately interfered with evidence associated with the scene even though they were absolutely innocent.

    Or that the Ramseys moved objects so that the police would not possibly look at them as guilty even though they were innocent?
    Neither. The argument is that if the Ramseys went to all the trouble to stage the scene in the basement, they wouldn't have pulled off the duct tape and moved her upstairs.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Quote Originally Posted by SunnieRN View Post
    If by 'unstaging' you mean the fact that JR took the tape off JonBenets mouth, literally picked her up and carried her upstairs and Patsy lying on top of her body, I believe it was self preservation. A way to allow the transfer of the fibers found on JonBenets body. Undoing of potential damning evidence.
    Like I told them (or attempted to): I don't think it was "unstaging" so much as it was CONTINUING the staging. I think that when Officer French didn't find the body, JR started having second thoughts. And what better way to contaminate the crime scene than to do it with a witness right there?

    But try to explain that to IDI, and it's no good.

    Also, why did they make time for John to shower and change clothes, prior to the call to BPD, but not Patsy? The more answers you find, create additional questions.
    Indeed...
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,579
    You know SD, I have come to the conclusion, that IDI theorists most likely can not allow any answer to suffice on this point, due to the fact, that by allowing such a logical interpretation, they would be admitting that a parent or the patents were involved or responsible.

    So, what does this mean for RDI? This means we can present WHAT was done, that we KNOW occurred. We know that John contaminated a crime scene, that Patsy was sitting on top of, in her home. We also know that they called BPD, friends, their pastor, to come to the home, despite the fact thah the ransom note threatened their daughter would be beheaded.

    We know that John only looked outside, to see if anything was amiss for a matter of seconds. No search to see if they were being watched prior to phone calls, having people over, etc.

    We know that PR and JR were in the house all night, along with Burke and JonBenet.

    We know that John searched the house, including the basement, prior to the BPD arriving, also, under JonBenets bed, in his underwear, by testimony he gave. Yet, did not find JonBenet.

    We know that FW searched the basement, opening the wine cellar door. Standing in the doorway, looking for the switch, not finding it, re-locking the door. Yet old eagle eyed JR, upon opening the door, saw JonBenet prior to turning on the light or stepping into the room. Thereby seeing through walls, into a darkened room and spotting JonBenet.

    We know hat there was a scream at midnight.

    We know that other evidence in the home was disturbed by good meaning friends who were cleaning the kitchen.

    We know that Burke was removed without being questioned and the R's admitted later that he had been awake at some point.

    We know JonBenet walked into the house carrying presents, although the R's lied and said they carried her upstairs asleep.

    We know JonBenet had chronic/prior erosion of her hymen, indicating abuse.

    We know that at sometime Burke and JonBenet had tea and pineapple, after returning home from the Whites.

    We know that neighbors saw flickering lights (most likely from a flashlight), through the R's windows that night. Also, the outside light that had been on EVERY night, was not on that night.

    We know that the size 12 ubdies, that Patsy said were in JonBenets drawer, were turned in 5 years later, still in their original packaging except for the Wednesday pair, found on JonBenet.

    This is but a small list of what we do KNOW, as fact. How anyone could rule out JonBenets parents in totality, is so far beyond my understanding. There is even more information than what I have listed here.

    You can not convince someone who refuses to be objective. All you can do is present the truth, as documented. You can never convince people of what they do not or will not believe.

    There was contamination of the crime scene, by John, Officer French and Patsy, also by FW when he picked up the tape from JonBenets mouth. IDI will interpret that one way, where as RDI will interpret it another. I just happen to be of the RDI opinion.
    ___________________

    "This Time We Get It Right!"
    If you can read this, thank a teacher, if it's in English, thank a soldier!
    If I forget to mention it. Everything I post is my opinion, right or wrong, good or bad.
    If you have questions about Rebecca Zahaus death, please watch this:http://websleuths.com/forums/showpos...00&postcount=1

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    8,022
    We do know those things, but there are a few things that can't be proven as fact.
    For one, while BR's prints were found on the tea glass and pineapple bowl (Patsy's were on the bowl as well), prints (like some DNA) cannot be "dated" as to when they were left. Without an eyewitness, confession or proof (such as a photo) we cannot definitely place BR at the table with JB as she ate the pineapple. A defense attorney would rip that apart. We cannot prove that BR left his prints at the same time JB ate the pineapple.

    We have only JR's WORD he searched the house in his underwear. Actually, I don't believe he did. Why would he? He knew she wasn't really kidnapped or missing. He may have done it to "explain" why his underwear fibers were there, but I don't believe I have ever seen a report that stated his underwear fibers were found anywhere His SHIRT fibers were found in JB's underwear.
    Ditto his looking outside. He CLAIMED to do so. Again- why would he? There was nothing to look for. A parent frantically searching outside would also be ringing neighbor's doorbells to see it she was there. Moot point unless a neighbor kidnapped her anyway.

    As for the rest- spot on! They are all things we KNOW.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,579
    I agree about the fingerprints on the glass DeeDee, but as for Johns statements, if and when it went to court, he would have had to of answered for them.

    Would have been quite interesting testimony.
    ___________________

    "This Time We Get It Right!"
    If you can read this, thank a teacher, if it's in English, thank a soldier!
    If I forget to mention it. Everything I post is my opinion, right or wrong, good or bad.
    If you have questions about Rebecca Zahaus death, please watch this:http://websleuths.com/forums/showpos...00&postcount=1

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Quick question
    By Heaven68 in forum Forum Finesse
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-13-2004, 12:51 PM