1056 users online (255 members and 801 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News

View Poll Results: who molested/abused JB?

Voters
544. You may not vote on this poll
  • JR

    147 27.02%
  • BR

    149 27.39%
  • JAR

    26 4.78%
  • a close family friend

    35 6.43%
  • a stranger/stalker a la JMK

    18 3.31%
  • PR-it wasn't sexual abuse,it was corporal punishment

    83 15.26%
  • she wasn't previously abused/molested

    86 15.81%

Page 1 of 117 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1744
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,949

    Who molested/abused Jonbenet?

    this issue always kept me from being sure that BDI.I always thought that the parents behaviour fits the BDI theory,her wounds as well,the garrote,the strangulation and some other things.
    But JB being previously molested/abused makes me rethink all this.
    PLUS all the trouble the killer/killers went through with redressing /whiping her off,the most important part of the staging IMO.This is what needed to be covered for.
    Ramsey case: "Instead of being the DNA of one person, they have instead created a composite of someone who does not exist. "

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,019
    I don't think there's any doubt that JBR's vagina was damaged in a way that is inconsistent with bubble baths, masturbation or scratching from vaginitis - to me, the autopsy report is uncharacteristically clear on that point. I am not entirely sure that the damage was of overtly sexual provenance (ie. it may have involved a female charged with JBR's genital cleanliness, which, as discussed on here, is an incredibly common source of vaginal damage in children).

    But, for me, there's a really important omission from this list of candidates.....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    8,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Sophie View Post

    But, for me, there's a really important omission from this list of candidates.....

    Who? Initials would suffice.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,075
    I picked PR but I'm not sure corporal punishment was the reason.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,353
    Quote Originally Posted by dodie20 View Post
    I picked PR but I'm not sure corporal punishment was the reason.
    I will say here that I was the court-appointed supervisor years ago for supervised visitation for a mother who had sexually molested her two young children. I believe the root of her behavior was the sexual abuse she suffered herself as a child, her obsessive-compulsive nature, and thinking her children were literally an extension of her own body that she 'owned'. The memory of those visitations still gives me goosebumps.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Quote Originally Posted by OneLove View Post
    I will say here that I was the court-appointed supervisor years ago for supervised visitation for a mother who had sexually molested her two young children. I believe the root of her behavior was the sexual abuse she suffered herself as a child, her obsessive-compulsive nature, and thinking her children were literally an extension of her own body that she 'owned'. The memory of those visitations still gives me goosebumps.
    Wow. You must have read my mind.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,949
    Okay,but PR being the abuser/punisher really doesn't explain why JR helped her in the cover-up,I will never ever buy that theory that he had no clue whatsoever re what happened(she did it all by herself).And if you trust and rely on the fiber evidence,then how do you explain his fibers in JB's underwear.
    Also,and this is strictly my opinion and gut feeling,I don't see JR as being the innocent little lamb controlled and manipulated by his wife,on the other hand I see in PR what I saw in many women who stand by their men no matter WHAT.
    And there's another thing,if we are to believe that PR abused/punished JB BEFORE then I guess this wasn't just an accident.
    Ramsey case: "Instead of being the DNA of one person, they have instead created a composite of someone who does not exist. "

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,914
    Quote Originally Posted by madeleine View Post
    Okay,but PR being the abuser/punisher really doesn't explain why JR helped her in the cover-up,I will never ever buy that theory that he had no clue whatsoever re what happened(she did it all by herself).And if you trust and rely on the fiber evidence,then how do you explain his fibers in JB's underwear.
    Yeah, if it weren't for that, I might be able to give him a pass.

    Also,and this is strictly my opinion and gut feeling,I don't see JR as being the innocent little lamb controlled and manipulated by his wife,on the other hand I see in PR what I saw in many women who stand by their men no matter WHAT.
    I can see that, too.

    And there's another thing,if we are to believe that PR abused/punished JB BEFORE then I guess this wasn't just an accident.
    You mean more like an escalation?
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    7,923
    Quote Originally Posted by madeleine View Post
    Okay,but PR being the abuser/punisher really doesn't explain why JR helped her in the cover-up,I will never ever buy that theory that he had no clue whatsoever re what happened(she did it all by herself).And if you trust and rely on the fiber evidence,then how do you explain his fibers in JB's underwear.
    Also,and this is strictly my opinion and gut feeling,I don't see JR as being the innocent little lamb controlled and manipulated by his wife,on the other hand I see in PR what I saw in many women who stand by their men no matter WHAT.
    And there's another thing,if we are to believe that PR abused/punished JB BEFORE then I guess this wasn't just an accident.
    madeleine,
    The masking of any sexual assault is a big clue. Consider JonBenet's homicide as the real deal e.g. intruder makes an unseen entrance into the Ramsey household, enters JonBenet's room, sexually assaults her, then strangles her using some cord he brought for that purpose. Then he thinks I'll need some time to return back to base so I'll hide the body in the basement, and write a bogus ransom note, this should give me a few extra hours to shower and burn my clothing etc etc.

    But JonBenet is found secluded in the wine-cellar redressed in clean size-12 underwear underneath a pair of white longjohns.

    No psychopath is going to bother redressing and wiping down JonBenet. The sexual assault is the last thing on his mind, he knows that will be discovered, because he knows there will be a post-mortem investigation, so hiding it is redundant!

    Now a corroborating piece of evidence is the Ramsey testimony. They say changed JonBenet's clothing upon return from the White's.

    They placed the longjohns on her, which indirectly suggests hiding her genital injuries was very important to the person conducting the wine-cellar staging.

    Otherwise she could have been left as per the former psychpathic scenario, e.g. bottomless and obviously injured.

    In an alleged RDI someone chose to mask the injury and incorporate dressing JonBenet in the longjohns as part of their version of events the night before.

    But the size-12's gave the game away, big time, so much so the Ramsey's found the remaining size-12's in a packing crate at a much later date. Even they knew how important the size-12's were.

    So its entirely possible that PR killed JonBenet as per Steve Thomas' theory, but that JR has something that requires to be hidden, so he amends Patsy's preferred staging to one that suits his agenda?

    Yet from memory Coroner Meyer explicitly said that JonBenet had been sexually assaulted prior to her death e.g. not merely vigorously cleansed?


    .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    8,022
    You know, the more I think about it, I simply can't see EITHER parent covering up for the other. This was THEIR CHILD, and she was DEAD. Imagine these scenarios: Patsy kills JB accidentally with a bash/slam to the head. JR finds out but agrees to help with the cover up because he has sexually abused her? So after their daughter has been killed NOW he has to tell Patsy that he's been sexually molesting her, so he'll help her stage it to look like a kidnapping so no one will find out? Unlikely.
    Or JR kills JB with a bash on the head because she screamed as she was being sexually molested and Patsy agrees to cover it up so she can continue to enjoy her lifestyle?
    Unlikely.
    BUT envision their son(s) as the perps and you have a whole 'nother ball game.
    NOW I can see it.

    No way Patsy did all of this by herself, and JR just goes along with it when he finds out.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,768
    I read a theory on a JBR forum that said perhaps when Fleet White was driving Burke to his house, Burke told Fleet what happened in the house, and that explains Fleet's post-12/26 behavior.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Runnin' up that hill....
    Posts
    264
    As people have alluded to, one of the problems is reconciling why any parent would cover-up for another. What would compel them to do this?

    I have tended to agree with Cyril Wecht's thesis of a 'death game gone awry' and and so have pondered why Patsy, is she did not kill John Benet, would cover-up for John?

    What if Patsy was molesting her? I'm no expert and do not know for certain.

    I just have a hard time understanding why Patsy, who wrote that ransom note and so was involved, would cover-up for John if she knew he killed JonBenet.

    What if John killed JonBenet via Wechts theory but didn't relay that to Patsy. Therefore Patsy was covering up for her hubby but with no knowledge of his sexually molesting the kid?

    What if both parents were sexually abusing Jonbenet?

    Just some thoughts...........
    William Wallace: They may take our lives, but they’ll never take our FREEDOM!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,075
    Quote Originally Posted by Let_Forever_Be View Post
    As people have alluded to, one of the problems is reconciling why any parent would cover-up for another. What would compel them to do this?

    I have tended to agree with Cyril Wecht's thesis of a 'death game gone awry' and and so have pondered why Patsy, is she did not kill John Benet, would cover-up for John?

    What if Patsy was molesting her? I'm no expert and do not know for certain.

    I just have a hard time understanding why Patsy, who wrote that ransom note and so was involved, would cover-up for John if she knew he killed JonBenet.

    What if John killed JonBenet via Wechts theory but didn't relay that to Patsy. Therefore Patsy was covering up for her hubby but with no knowledge of his sexually molesting the kid?

    What if both parents were sexually abusing Jonbenet?

    Just some thoughts...........
    IDK why a spouse would cover up for the other...maybe it's as simple as them keeping outsiders out of personal business. When a wife looks at her husband, she wouldn't just see a murderer, she'd still see her husband ...and maybe she has always made excuses for him and semi blames the child. A lot of times, I've noticed that men take parenting cues from their wives. If she's lenient, so is he. If she's abusive, so is he. If a mother was the murderer, I could see this kind of man just stepping back and not involving himself, unless he's accused. I've been married for over 20 years and if my husband did something like this, I'd be horrified...partly because there would be no signs. But if somebody was married to a different kind of man, they might not be so shocked...so how they'd handle it, would be different. My town's police chief's wife was a shoplifter, but nobody knew about it until after he died. She got caught in a neighboring town and he wasn't around to take care of the problem. I wonder how far a man man like that would go to protect his wife and name. MOO

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Runnin' up that hill....
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by dodie20 View Post
    IDK why a spouse would cover up for the other...maybe it's as simple as them keeping outsiders out of personal business. When a wife looks at her husband, she wouldn't just see a murderer, she'd still see her husband ...and maybe she has always made excuses for him and semi blames the child. A lot of times, I've noticed that men take parenting cues from their wives. If she's lenient, so is he. If she's abusive, so is he. If a mother was the murderer, I could see this kind of man just stepping back and not involving himself, unless he's accused. I've been married for over 20 years and if my husband did something like this, I'd be horrified...partly because there would be no signs. But if somebody was married to a different kind of man, they might not be so shocked...so how they'd handle it, would be different. My town's police chief's wife was a shoplifter, but nobody knew about it until after he died. She got caught in a neighboring town and he wasn't around to take care of the problem. I wonder how far a man man like that would go to protect his wife and name. MOO
    Excellent points.

    The acute and prior sexual abuse is often used to implicate John Ramsey as the abuser. The garrotte and "sex game gone awry" state a sexual nature to JonBenet's death which wasn't intentional e.g the perpetrator didn't mean to kill JonBenet. If Patsy wrote the ransom note, she either killed JohnBenet or was covering up for someone/others.

    But imagine if John did it -- he at some point got Patsy involved. How do you break it to her "erm, our daughter's dead...". Did he lie and make something up? Did she know he was molesting her and so covered up for that as she had been knowing of his deed and thus approved it.

    Who knows.
    William Wallace: They may take our lives, but they’ll never take our FREEDOM!!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Let_Forever_Be View Post
    As people have alluded to, one of the problems is reconciling why any parent would cover-up for another. What would compel them to do this?

    I have tended to agree with Cyril Wecht's thesis of a 'death game gone awry' and and so have pondered why Patsy, is she did not kill John Benet, would cover-up for John?

    What if Patsy was molesting her? I'm no expert and do not know for certain.

    I just have a hard time understanding why Patsy, who wrote that ransom note and so was involved, would cover-up for John if she knew he killed JonBenet.

    What if John killed JonBenet via Wechts theory but didn't relay that to Patsy. Therefore Patsy was covering up for her hubby but with no knowledge of his sexually molesting the kid?

    What if both parents were sexually abusing Jonbenet?

    Just some thoughts...........
    I wouldn't say it's impossible,I thought about it.There was a case years ago,both parents were arrested,they were BOTH molesting BOTH kids,a little girl and her little brother,sex games.
    Ramsey case: "Instead of being the DNA of one person, they have instead created a composite of someone who does not exist. "

Page 1 of 117 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 78
    Last Post: 11-13-2016, 07:10 PM
  2. Molested with the handle?
    By Paradox in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 396
    Last Post: 06-26-2014, 09:42 AM
  3. PA - 20+ Teens Molested by PA Cop
    By MrsBuckWeaver in forum Crimes-Spotlight on Children
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-28-2007, 11:11 PM
  4. Dad & pal molested girl, 5, cops say
    By Shortcake21 in forum Crimes-Spotlight on Children
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-29-2005, 07:53 AM