Baez, is it legal?

angeldust said:

What a great point charleyann

Wonder if the JAC can claw back all the money they ve paid out on unecessary private investigater and experts when he knew she Died in the pool ( which is a load of ....well u know what I mean)

x a

Click to expand...

Trvl4Lyfe said:

I've always said, why sit locked up for 3 years "knowing it was an accident". I would have been singing like a bird. Loudly!

Click to expand...

passin_through said:

Everybody and his brother seems to have made a dollar off Caylee--is it legal--yep.

Moral...that's personal and many people will need to answer to that question one day, no?

Click to expand...

Ricki said:

Yes it pretty disgusting others are making money of a precious, deceased baby girl. I equate that to thievery, a crime. Morals are lacking here and the almighty dollar is everything to them. Greed is their motive. Money is truly the route to evil. I have to say there is a lot wrong with this world, love of money is only one thing. Then there is murder....profiting off of a murder gives me the impression that they think it is just business as usual. Pretty sad.

Click to expand...

Ricki said:

I just wanted to add one more thing. Baez used the words about Kronk.( morally bankrupt)
These descriptive words apply to the DF team. They are MORALLY BANKRUPT.

Click to expand...

TxLady2 said:

Jose Baez is allowed to present any theory he wants to, and claim that this information just came to light a few weeks ago. There is no way to prove that he knew about it 3 years ago.
CASEY is the one who should have admitted what happened to Caylee 3 years ago. CASEY is the one who has cost the state all that money for searches and for her defense. CASEY is the one who should be held responsible for everything she has put everybody through. Baez is only doing what a defense lawyer is supposed to do, defend their client. A lot of lawyers are unethical, he's not the only one. Why blame ONLY him for this? Blame the person who caused Caylee's death and the one who brought all this about in the first place.

Click to expand...

Ricki said:

I will agree with you on that and I will say that KC is included in the one that is Morally Bankrupt. I don't like the fact that people are reaping in the dough on this. It's just not right in my eyes. It is frustrating when you can not do a thing about it.[/QUO

Smirking, Sunglasses, babes on each arm and sailing with celebrities. MORALLY EMPTY is the term I would use. Seems people forget it is about a precious little girl cut short .

"Old People die , with achievements and memories. Children die with opportunites and dreams ..."

Charleyann:banghead:

Click to expand...

Macushla said:

Didn't HHJP point out at one hearing that a number of lawyers were starting to make money by going after attorneys who wasted the JAC's money? I clearly remember him saying that in one hearing.

Unfortunately, all the defense has to say is that KC never told them the 'true' story until 6 weeks before the trial started. Since KC will never say a word, it will be impossible to prove anything, so yes, they will get away with it.

Click to expand...

Macushla said:

Didn't HHJP point out at one hearing that a number of lawyers were starting to make money by going after attorneys who wasted the JAC's money? I clearly remember him saying that in one hearing.

Unfortunately, all the defense has to say is that KC never told them the 'true' story until 6 weeks before the trial started. Since KC will never say a word, it will be impossible to prove anything, so yes, they will get away with it.

Click to expand...

TxLady2 said:

I disagree. Baez may be wrong for making accusations about other people involved which he can't prove, but he is only defending his client in any way he possibly can. Defense lawyers do it every day. Not all of them can afford the luxury of only taking on clients who they know are innocent. Some of them have to take on clients who may be guilty, but it's still their job and they are bound to do the best they can to defend them.
Baez did not cause this case to come about, nor did any of his defense team. I think all of them volunteered to help. Casey hired him to defend her, and even if he is doing a poor job of it... it does not make him morally bankrupt. Unfortunately, there are enough criminals in the world to create a big demand for defense lawyers, but you can't blame the lawyers because the crimes happen.

Click to expand...

passin_through said:

That seems sane, though.

Click to expand...

Charleyann said:

So the the defense is claiming that poor Caylee died in the swimmng pool on June 16/2008.....

So why did the defense ask for and receive money to investigate innocent people? Look at the turmoil and more investigative money that went into equasearch. The money all these people had to pay to retain lawyers doesn't seem right or real ! Near the end demanding more more to search the searchers of equasearch and look for someone to say her body was never in the swam all the time , especially knowing Caylee died all in the pool.

All the experts hired on behalf of the defense to claim she died in the pool accidently, the extra attorneys paid for by the tax payers money for Casey's defense, yet Baez seems to be handling it ......

That long search for Caylee's body and the imaginary babysitter ?

Is this legal and will the defense team suffer any consequences for mishandling or misleading authorites and other innocent folk. For knowingly taking money for false pretenses ?

Sorry mods if this is not in the right place. I just don't understand the lawin Florida. Don't know how the defense attorneys can mislead the courts and people and demand money for false and misleadingt statements.....

Why the elaborate story , Casey style ? Why deny the baby was in the trunk if it were an accident?

Charleyann :banghead:

Click to expand...

RANCH said:

Do you think that if early on Baez said it was an accident that the SA would have said ok we,ll drops the charges,Casey's free to go. I would hope not.

Click to expand...