GUILTY UK - Joanne Fraill, juror, for contempt of court, Manchester, 2010

...why would she EVER have thought that was smart? it didnt occur to her there was a reason the defendant was not part of the deliberation process? beggars belief.
 
Oh.
My.
Goodness.

I really did not think there was anyone on the planet who would think this was ok! It is obvious the juror was very sympathetic to the defendant.....but her decision to make contact during the deliberations boggles the mind. I don't think the juror meant any harm, but it is hard to believe she didn't know that contacting the defendant was wrong, wrong, wrong. :waitasec:
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
238
Guests online
3,543
Total visitors
3,781

Forum statistics

Threads
592,250
Messages
17,966,003
Members
228,732
Latest member
FrnkKrcher
Back
Top