758 users online (108 members and 650 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NW Oregon Coast
    Posts
    1,821

    Is it POSSIBLE the DT is NOT going to call GA?

    george and Cindy Anthony's attorney , a Mr. Lippman, just said on HLN to Vinny that the DT HAS NOT notified either George or Cindy that they will be called to the stand as part of the defense presentation.

    He noted that it is not a requirement, but is a courtesy, and he wonders how the DT knows his clients will be in court in case they want to question them.

    This raises the possibility that George WILL NOT be called by the dt.

    If not, if George is NOT called, it means George has been on the stand and IS NEVER QUEsTIONED about the dt story of RAPE and COVER UP.


    does anyone else find that possibility almost unimaginable? How do you accuse someone of rape and running a cover up and NEVER QUESTION them about it?

    Is that even possible?

    i am seriously stunned at that possibility.


    Haven't you assumed George would be asked about RAPE and the COVER UP he is accused of masterminding on the stand?

    and if he is NOT even asked about either....??????????????????????
    IF I PUT IT HERE ITS MY OPINION. apparently i have no idea when i need to say that in a post, so this should cover it....IN MY OPINION anyways,

    welcome to the gates of hell JVDS.




    Jose Baez: “I sincerely believe that when we have finally spoken, everyone, and I mean everyone, will sit back and say, ‘Now, I understand. That explains it.’”



    Jose Baez to da judge :

    ".....that type of testing is unique. we requested that they be allowed to test items and that of course was objected to by the state and and uh the state uh granted or sustained their objection, denied our opportunity to have him test these items due to a very specialized field, subfield, of dna that he is one of the pioneers of uh in the alternative of we were granted the ability to test certain items by an outside lab...."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    21,758
    costal, this one has me scratching my head as well. And I don't think GA knew that, that big bus was headed his way.
    Media thread for Abby and Libby.


    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...5#post13163455

    WebSleuths Lingo thread.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...bsleuths-Lingo

    Unless I provide a link, every one of my posts are to be considered rumor, Speculation, or simply MY OWN OPINION.

    We are the watchers. We are witnesses. We see what has gone before. We see what happens now, at this dangerous moment in human history. We see what's going to happen - what will surely happen - unless we come together: we - the Peoples of all Nations - to restore peace and harmony and balance to the Earth, our Mother.


    THE IGNORE BUTTON IS YOUR FRIEND!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    the restaurant at the end of the universe
    Posts
    922
    I think the clue in the statement is that it's not a requirement but a courtesy.... DT doesn't seem to have the "professional courtesy" thing anywhere in their methods.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NW Oregon Coast
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Tulessa View Post
    costal, this one has me scratching my head as well. And I don't think GA knew that, that big bus was headed his way.
    I cannot imagine he would not be challenged directly on the stand as to the horrendous charges they have made. How can they expect anyone to believe their story if they do not pursue it in court with the alleged perpetrator?

    its incredible. it doesn't even seem possible to me. whats going on?
    IF I PUT IT HERE ITS MY OPINION. apparently i have no idea when i need to say that in a post, so this should cover it....IN MY OPINION anyways,

    welcome to the gates of hell JVDS.




    Jose Baez: “I sincerely believe that when we have finally spoken, everyone, and I mean everyone, will sit back and say, ‘Now, I understand. That explains it.’”



    Jose Baez to da judge :

    ".....that type of testing is unique. we requested that they be allowed to test items and that of course was objected to by the state and and uh the state uh granted or sustained their objection, denied our opportunity to have him test these items due to a very specialized field, subfield, of dna that he is one of the pioneers of uh in the alternative of we were granted the ability to test certain items by an outside lab...."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    46,818
    I think they are just messing with George's head. They know he is going to be in court every day because he would look guilty if he suddenly stopped showing up when the DT took over. George has to show up and they know it. So they are not going to be 'courteous' and warn him ahead of time.
    “Every day that they don’t find something is good for me.“ Billie Dunn

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NW Oregon Coast
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by tragco View Post
    I think the clue in the statement is that it's not a requirement but a courtesy.... DT doesn't seem to have the "professional courtesy" thing anywhere in their methods.
    true but if they are not notified and they are not there, in court, they cannot testify. so if you were going to call them, you would notify them to make sure they would be there.

    forget courtesy. think necessity. I am accusing George. I have to question him about it, don't I?

    well if I don't notify him, he may not be there, and I cannot question him.

    now what do I do???????????????????
    IF I PUT IT HERE ITS MY OPINION. apparently i have no idea when i need to say that in a post, so this should cover it....IN MY OPINION anyways,

    welcome to the gates of hell JVDS.




    Jose Baez: “I sincerely believe that when we have finally spoken, everyone, and I mean everyone, will sit back and say, ‘Now, I understand. That explains it.’”



    Jose Baez to da judge :

    ".....that type of testing is unique. we requested that they be allowed to test items and that of course was objected to by the state and and uh the state uh granted or sustained their objection, denied our opportunity to have him test these items due to a very specialized field, subfield, of dna that he is one of the pioneers of uh in the alternative of we were granted the ability to test certain items by an outside lab...."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,978
    the only hope they have in their "defense" is to harass GA in the hopes that he flips out IMO. he will sure be called.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by tragco View Post
    I think the clue in the statement is that it's not a requirement but a courtesy.... DT doesn't seem to have the "professional courtesy" thing anywhere in their methods.
    I agree and, the DT pretty much knows that GA and CA are going to be in court unless of course they decide not to just to spite the DT.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NW Oregon Coast
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by katydid23 View Post
    I think they are just messing with George's head. They know he is going to be in court every day because he would look guilty if he suddenly stopped showing up when the DT took over. George has to show up and they know it. So they are not going to be 'courteous' and warn him ahead of time.
    no. he does not HAVE to show up. he simply does not. it is there responsibility to call him.

    they can't say in summation, "well we would have questioned him but he wasn't in court." they cannot say that.

    casey jordan just said " they (the dt) is going to start their case against GA tomorrow."

    how can they make a case against him without questioning him in court about their case?
    IF I PUT IT HERE ITS MY OPINION. apparently i have no idea when i need to say that in a post, so this should cover it....IN MY OPINION anyways,

    welcome to the gates of hell JVDS.




    Jose Baez: “I sincerely believe that when we have finally spoken, everyone, and I mean everyone, will sit back and say, ‘Now, I understand. That explains it.’”



    Jose Baez to da judge :

    ".....that type of testing is unique. we requested that they be allowed to test items and that of course was objected to by the state and and uh the state uh granted or sustained their objection, denied our opportunity to have him test these items due to a very specialized field, subfield, of dna that he is one of the pioneers of uh in the alternative of we were granted the ability to test certain items by an outside lab...."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NW Oregon Coast
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by 2goldfish View Post
    the only hope they have in their "defense" is to harass GA in the hopes that he flips out IMO. he will sure be called.
    i was sure he would be called. but they have not insured that he will be available.



    otoh, the HLN th's have the witness list. surely they would be going ballistic if GA isn't on it.
    IF I PUT IT HERE ITS MY OPINION. apparently i have no idea when i need to say that in a post, so this should cover it....IN MY OPINION anyways,

    welcome to the gates of hell JVDS.




    Jose Baez: “I sincerely believe that when we have finally spoken, everyone, and I mean everyone, will sit back and say, ‘Now, I understand. That explains it.’”



    Jose Baez to da judge :

    ".....that type of testing is unique. we requested that they be allowed to test items and that of course was objected to by the state and and uh the state uh granted or sustained their objection, denied our opportunity to have him test these items due to a very specialized field, subfield, of dna that he is one of the pioneers of uh in the alternative of we were granted the ability to test certain items by an outside lab...."


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    427
    I think the DT will give notice, but only very little, like the night before, so that (in the DT mind) the can spring it on GA.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    the restaurant at the end of the universe
    Posts
    922
    Quote Originally Posted by costalpilot View Post
    true but if they are not notified and they are not there, in court, they cannot testify. so if you were going to call them, you would notify them to make sure they would be there.

    forget courtesy. think necessity. I am accusing George. I have to question him about it, don't I?

    well if I don't notify him, he may not be there, and I cannot question him.

    now what do I do???????????????????
    Very true. It would be sweet if they planned to call George tomorrow but Lippman convinced them to stay home, wouldn't it?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    46,818
    Quote Originally Posted by costalpilot View Post
    no. he does not HAVE to show up. he simply does not. it is there responsibility to call him.

    they can't say in summation, "well we would have questioned him but he wasn't in court." they cannot say that.

    casey jordan just said " they (the dt) is going to start their case against GA tomorrow."

    how can they make a case against him without questioning him in court about their case?
    He does not legally have to show up. But I am sure his attorney has advised him how bad it would look if he suddenly ditched out. He has been there every day pretty much, so it would make it look like he had something to hide if he quit coming now.
    “Every day that they don’t find something is good for me.“ Billie Dunn

  14. #14
    mikeysmommom's Avatar
    mikeysmommom is offline "A grandchild fills a space in your heart that you never knew was empty...."
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Garden State
    Posts
    4,621
    Quote Originally Posted by costalpilot View Post
    I cannot imagine he would not be challenged directly on the stand as to the horrendous charges they have made. How can they expect anyone to believe their story if they do not pursue it in court with the alleged perpetrator?

    its incredible. it doesn't even seem possible to me. whats going on?
    They might call others to the stand to show what a terrible father,hot headed,pervert he is and never call him. I hate the defendant and her DT team more each day.Not only is tomorrow 3yrs since Caylee's murder but Sunday is Fathers Day!
    I Love You MOM 6/16/32 - 5/30/09





    Justice for Travis 5/8/13

    Justice For Emma
    Stacey Barker - Guilty - Murder 1 - 5/24/11
    25 to Life - Sentenced 6/17/11

    Justice Denied for Caylee Marie Anthony
    July 5,2011

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    130
    This defense is not professional in any way. Since it has been pointed out today, I would expect to hear that the A's will have been noticed tomorrow or friday.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. 911 Call
    By Bobbarita in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 431
    Last Post: 09-03-2016, 11:24 PM
  2. The 911 Call
    By CW in forum Darlie Routier
    Replies: 500
    Last Post: 03-28-2016, 07:46 PM
  3. The 911 Call, LE Radio Call & Police Report
    By JBean in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 1199
    Last Post: 06-22-2010, 08:19 AM
  4. Phone call with Cindy and phone call with Leonard
    By Hailiejade77 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 09-04-2008, 11:46 PM