06-16-2011, 12:52 AM #1
Court: Calif. Dad Can Paste Daughter’s Face On Porn Pics
This just proves how sick our society is becoming:
"SACRAMENTO (CBS) — A state appellate court has overturned the child pornography conviction of a Northern California man who digitally inserted his 13-year-old daughter’s face onto graphic pictures of women because the images did not show minors engaging in sex acts, according to court documents.
...Gerber later admitted to taking pictures of his daughter posing in her bra and underwear for up to 20 minutes, and promising to give her cocaine in exchange for those pictures, according to documents from the Sixth District Court of Appeal in San Jose.
He admitted to masturbating to the photos and having “sick thoughts” about his daughter."
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/...-on-porn-pics/"Life is life's greatest gift. Guard the life of another creature as you would your own because it is your own. On life's scale of values, the smallest is no less precious to the creature who owns it than the largest..." Lloyd Biggle, Jr.
Let's bring Michelle Parker home: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ichelle+parker
All statements made by me are based on my opinion.
06-16-2011, 01:16 AM #2
There are no words to describe how absolutely sickening this is.The best advice I give to my children: Tell the truth - whether you like it or not.
06-16-2011, 03:42 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Let me be clear about this. The man was found to be following the letter of the law by pasting his daughter's young face onto the graphic photos of adults? It's OK because the adults were not engaging in sex? And he admitted that he had sick thoughts while viewing these images? If he just wanted photos of her face, why did she have to stand in her underwear, while he photographed her? Yikes!!
Just want to make sure I have it all straight. We definitely need more clarity about this practice as it comes up fairly frequently.
Please tell me that the teen will not be returning to her father--the man who masturbated to photos of her montaged image.
06-16-2011, 05:43 AM #4
What the hell is the judge thinking here? This is beyond bizarre. I sincerely hope that girl has been removed from the home, but I don't have a good feeling that she has been. Definitely more information is needed on this. The laws seem made to protect perps, not victims and this has got to stop.
By Belinda in forum Recently Sentenced and BeyondReplies: 5Last Post: 02-12-2012, 01:49 PM
By sleutherontheside in forum Up to the MinuteReplies: 40Last Post: 12-08-2010, 03:19 PM
By 2sisters in forum Up to the MinuteReplies: 0Last Post: 03-18-2010, 10:42 PM
By Cubby in forum Up to the MinuteReplies: 45Last Post: 01-19-2010, 11:11 PM
By VespaElf in forum Crimes-Spotlight on ChildrenReplies: 5Last Post: 10-30-2004, 10:13 AM