My impression, is that the DT is the one who caused this, NOT JA. If it was a "mastermind plan" by the DT to look several steps ahead and try to cause a mistrial, who on the current team sitting in the court room is smart enough for that? CM is the only potential DT member in the court room who could figure this out, unless it was "texted" in....IMO, MOO, etc. But I do not think we are going to get any kind of a mistrial here because of this. IMO, MOO, not a legal opinion of any kind.
I just saw the replay on IS and JA did not slam the cans down. His attitude came across to me as indignant this guy is refuting evidence he himself never tested. I saw nothing wrong with his behavior.
From what I've seen JB and CM have been much worse.
21merc7, ahoyhoy, Alcina, Americka, Angel4u2Whisper2, BetteDavisEyes, BigFatMommyDog, Bobbarita, CarolAnn, clannad, coco puff, Disguiseduser0308, Donjeta, ebedeeb, Insomnia Momma, jamesdoe, Khaki_Pants, liltexans, MaraSleuth, Marple, MelissaLee, Mountain_Kat, Mystic, newsjunkie, Novice Seeker, Oakley, pinkfly, PlainJaneDoe, reeseeva, rosepetal1065, RR0004, RSDhoping for a cure, sarah1215, SATA, Sedona722, stilettos, summerthyme, SuziQ, Truth Prevails, TxJan1971, wildchild1961
Don't you guys realize that the DEFENSE are the only ones that can use theatrical dramatics? :eyeroll:
Indeed, the irony is rich.
I understand that the "burden of proof" is the states responsibility but could someone explain to me how the DT can throw things out there without having to PROVE the theory their witness is testifying to.
I hope this question makes sense, it did in my head but not sure it came out the same way!
Should the State just have no further questions, let him go, and then in rebuttal bring Dr. Vass back up and ask him questions relevant to this witness' testimony? Or is there something that NEEDS to be addressed now?
Life is the most spectacular show on earth ♥
― Sara Gruen
All my posts are my opinion only!
~Justice for all~
If someone raises a dog to be aggressive it will be, no matter what breed it is.
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawakened."
HHJP cannot let this result in mistrial. Doing so opens the door to allow any defense lawyer to use shoddy questioning as an strategy or mechanism to defend their client. It outright undermines the process and encourages bad behavior instead of good.
Let that Mack Truck roll..........
Kindness is magic. (Derek)
I don't know how HHJP does it! The man is a solid rock of fortitude and patience! He's trying his best to clean up the DT mistakes so that the trial can continue fair and square.
So did DS make the mistake and JA compound it? I don't understand what the specific problem is?
Maybe Ashton should have pulled out a wrinkled memo pad, stuck it on an easel and drawn some pictures of cans (and labeled them "CANNS") and then pointed to them to question the witness.
21merc7, Alcina, BigFatMommyDog, clannad, Disguiseduser0308, Donjeta, Dr. Know?, Florida Native, HOOKEDNAN, huntington, IfIMay, jenniek, Jetaime, Khaki_Pants, knt, liltexans, Linda7NJ, logicalgirl, MaraSleuth, Marple, MelissaLee, newsjunkie, Novice Seeker, PlainJaneDoe, Reckless, RR0004, RSDhoping for a cure, shelbar53, SillyJilly, stilettos, thumbtack, Whaleshark, wildchild1961
If I were on the witness stand, and JA slammed those cans in front of me like that, I'd be intimidated & possibly fearful.
I've been thinking about how ICA wrote to her pal that JB said it would end in a mistrial. Did he not explain that she would have to stay in jail and it would be a do-over? I think she thought she could walk away if a mistrial is declared.
Anyway you look at it, the jurors heard the final question.
No way to erase that now....yehaaaaaaa
The DT's game is to get a mistrial because they fracked up royally and need to start fresh, and HHJP is on to them and trying his hardest to prevent that.
Is it possible for HHJP to do something about this without calling for a mistrial?
this is what "per bono" gets you......
The defense is trying to impeach Dr. Vass so how is it fair that the prosecution can't question the defense "expert" on whether or not he could've done the testing. I don't get it.
What is this pit in my stomach?