yllek
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 2,395
- Reaction score
- 586
I think it says a lot that the State only anticipates needing one day to put on their rebuttal case; the Defense did very little damage to the States case over the last 2+ weeks. Imo, the State only needs to call back:
1. Dr. G to rebut the "shoulda cracked the skull; shoddy work" assertion by Dr. Spitz
2. Gentiva compliance officer to rebut Cindy's testimony that she was not at work and was home when the incriminating chloroform searches were made.
3. George Anthony to rebut River Cruz's testimony that George made the "snowball" comment. (Imo she was weak and not credible, so maybe it's better not to put George up there again and possibly open up something else?)
Wondering what others think should be reiterated or cleared up before deliberations start...
1. Dr. G to rebut the "shoulda cracked the skull; shoddy work" assertion by Dr. Spitz
2. Gentiva compliance officer to rebut Cindy's testimony that she was not at work and was home when the incriminating chloroform searches were made.
3. George Anthony to rebut River Cruz's testimony that George made the "snowball" comment. (Imo she was weak and not credible, so maybe it's better not to put George up there again and possibly open up something else?)
Wondering what others think should be reiterated or cleared up before deliberations start...