Page 1 of 103 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1531
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    29,225

    The Verdict - Do you agree or disagree?

    Please continue here.

    ALSO - please remember that name calling will be removed. If you write a really good post, but then call someone names, the ENTIRE post will be removed. All your HARD WORK down the drain. THINK before hitting the POST BUTTON.

    All TOS apply - attack the post, NOT the poster. Don't bicker. If someone is getting under your skin, USE the IGNORE button.

    As always - if you have questions or problems with moderation or another poster - PM a member of the MOD TEAM. Don't respond in the thread because the responsibility lies with YOU and YOU will be the one that gets the TO.

    Thanks Everybody!

    Salem

    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145081"]Thread 1[/ame]



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    132
    Posted by beccalecca1:

    I don't think that LE should arrest someone based off of guess work. The statements made by the A's could have been confirmed or verified if LE didn't look the other way. I don't believe it would've been too hard to do (pull up work records, cell records, etc). When investigating a missing child turned deceased child, I believe you shouldn't "guess".
    &
    If all LE "guessed" at who the suspects were and didn't investigate any other possibility, then there would be a lack of evidence. But just to make sure you have a solid case against someone you believe to be the criminal... why not just do a little more leg work? It's been 3 years before trial, lots of time for them to look down other avenues.



    That's your opinion, whether I agree or not.
    This is mine, whether you agree or not - when facts are the minimum and lies are the maximum, there needs to be a starting point - no one is going to raise their hand and yell 'I'm a suspect', and it's not likely the victim is going to write their murderer's name in blood (although it can happen).
    If you believe there is no guesswork involved when investigating a crime, then that's what you believe. I'm of a different mind. I believe there would be many lost clues in many cases without guessing.

    I will not continue to defend 'guesswork'.


  3. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to M.James For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    2,590

    Do I agree or disagree with the verdict?

    To answer the thread's question, I strongly disagree with the verdict.

    Unless specified otherwise and linked, my posts are simply random thoughts of mine, in no particular order, not directed at any post or poster, including but not limited to the ones directly above mine. My opinion only, yours may vary. IMO. JMO. IMHO. JMHO. MOO. Disclaimer, small print, asterisk, and etc.



  5. #4
    I completely disagree with the verdict.



  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,337
    I disagree with the verdict strongly. The jury should have at least found her guilty of the third count.



  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Carolina Girl View Post
    I disagree with the verdict strongly. The jury should have at least found her guilty of the third count.
    ...and let's remember...not one question was asked. I don't believe they could possible have gone through EVERYTHING (including the jury instructions) and not have had ONE question to ask of the Court.



  8. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,782
    Quote Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
    ...and let's remember...not one question was asked. I don't believe they could possible have gone through EVERYTHING (including the jury instructions) and not have had ONE question to ask of the Court.
    Not to mention, requesting to see the duct tape and heart sticker residue on that duct tape BEFORE THE TRIAL WAS OVER!!!! I know I keep asking, but why wasn't a mistrial declared? HHJBP just took this in his stride and I think it was made available to them -- someone please correct me if this is wrong.

    I adamantly DISAGREE with the verdict!!!!

    imo


  9. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to roseofsharon For This Useful Post:


  10. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,963
    I do not agree with the verdict, but I have to accept it.
    As for not asking one question, my guess is they pretty much had their minds made up before they began deliberating and according to a lot of lawyers, that is not uncommon. We now know that the vote was split at first, so I would think their deliberations consisted of the majority arguing to swing the vote around to a unanimous "not guilty."
    Yes, they should have found her guilty of something, but it is what it is. I think they didn't understand the instructions, 26 pages is a lot to wade through, IMO.


  11. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TxLady2 For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,782
    "They found the only twelve people who still think the world is flat"

    Sue Moss


    IMO -- this statement says it all!!!!!



  13. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    201
    I have to disagree based on the known facts.

    CFCA lies. Her family lies. Caylee was dead with duct tape around her face.

    That's enough for me to "connect the dots."
    Beyond the door,
    There's peace I'm sure,
    And I know there'll be no more
    Tears in heaven.



  14. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    oklahoma/heart of tornado alley
    Posts
    571
    no i do NOT agree w/ verdict,nor do i have to respect it, or accept it, at all. at very least should have gotten manslaughter or agg. child abuse...( imo should have gotten 1st degree murder, but again all moo)
    to keep w/in TOS, thats all im gonna say



  15. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North of 49th Parallel
    Posts
    3,769

    I Could NOT Vote or thank everyone !

    I find it dispicable that any jury could exhonerate Ms KC for being responsible for precious Caylee's death..It's in...EXUSEABLE for any group of 12 to somehow hate KC's "Family" background as any sort of exuse to snuff a 2 year olds life out..bound, gag, package and DUMP her body to be muched on by critters of the swamp located less than half mile from their home....

    It's it difficult for me even to try why these dozen peoples could ExHONERATE "Caylee's" momma..who by all evidence was the LAST "Caregiver" incharge of her well being..Makes me want to BARF!! I keep having re-ocurring dreams just how 12 normal people could HATE Grandparents..and Family Issues so much to EXCUSE "SNUFFING OUT" a poor baby's life..I am so sickened,,I doubt I will ever be able to what such INJUSTICE again and applaud all those that BLOCK FOrtunes to be made on the back of Caylee's Death..

    Sorry, It's not just the INJUSTICE..but a "Notoriety" that breeds $$$ ..I take some respise knowing KC/ JB and any one else who benefit from this INJUSTICE will reap their rewards by a much higher power



  16. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to LyndyLoo For This Useful Post:


  17. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Northern Adirondack Mountains
    Posts
    4,334
    I share C. Mason's surprise at the verdict. Surprise. Everyone was shocked, including Casey! I don't want to hear another word from this jury, Casey, the A's or Baez.
    My posts are my opinion only.....


  18. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Baznme For This Useful Post:


  19. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    oklahoma/heart of tornado alley
    Posts
    571
    Quote Originally Posted by Baznme View Post
    I share C. Mason's surprise at the verdict. Surprise. Everyone was shocked, including Casey! I don't want to hear another word from this jury, Casey, the A's or Baez.
    reminds me how oj team was shocked at his verdict, including oj...kinda eerie similar path here...imo


  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to charok For This Useful Post:


  21. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Upper Peninsula of Michigan
    Posts
    856
    Quote Originally Posted by M.James View Post
    Posted by beccalecca1:

    I don't think that LE should arrest someone based off of guess work. The statements made by the A's could have been confirmed or verified if LE didn't look the other way. I don't believe it would've been too hard to do (pull up work records, cell records, etc). When investigating a missing child turned deceased child, I believe you shouldn't "guess".
    &
    If all LE "guessed" at who the suspects were and didn't investigate any other possibility, then there would be a lack of evidence. But just to make sure you have a solid case against someone you believe to be the criminal... why not just do a little more leg work? It's been 3 years before trial, lots of time for them to look down other avenues.



    That's your opinion, whether I agree or not.
    This is mine, whether you agree or not - when facts are the minimum and lies are the maximum, there needs to be a starting point - no one is going to raise their hand and yell 'I'm a suspect', and it's not likely the victim is going to write their murderer's name in blood (although it can happen).
    If you believe there is no guesswork involved when investigating a crime, then that's what you believe. I'm of a different mind. I believe there would be many lost clues in many cases without guessing.

    I will not continue to defend 'guesswork'.

    My impression of the original post on "guesswork" was kinda of like you throw a dart at a board with all the player's pictures on it... whoever it lands on gets the arrest. Maybe I was wrong in assuming that.

    I can understand watching a person of interest until you get enough evidence to arrest them, etc. (Isn't that the way normal investigations go?, Joran wasn't arrested by the U.S.... right?).


  22. The Following User Says Thank You to beccalecca1 For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 103 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. If you agree or disagree with the verdict, let us know why
    By JBean in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1347
    Last Post: 07-24-2011, 04:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •