1009 users online (230 members and 779 guests)  

Websleuths News


Results 1 to 15 of 1228

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by scoops View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Birch View Post
    Firecat seems to try to be confirming that it's actually not fact? if I'm reading that right.


    And if I'm reading it right, Firecat is on one hand confirming that it's actually not fact, but on the other hand is confirming that the investigator agrees/ qualifies with the person that said the blood was found to be menstraul.

    It can't be both ways.

    If the carpet samples have NEVER been tested, then the investigator would've said that the first person (shack) is flat wrong. They could in no way make a claim about the blood being menstraul, because there were no testing done. But instead the investigator goes on to qualify shacks comments and even brings up the example of the clothes hamper.
    Ok, then you and I are having a complete and total disagreement (which is fine, obvs!) because my read on it is, if the stuff hasn't been tested, how can the investigator say that someone is flat wrong? S/he doesn't know this other person is flat wrong, because.....it hasn't been conclusively prooved one way or the other.

    If, on the other hand, nothing's been tested, then.....by all means, speculate away. You, me, the investigator, your uncle tony, whoever. Such as "yeah we got blood samples, but they may not mean anything. They may not be Maura. They could be somebody's old menstrual blood from the cloths hamper for all we know."

    Wow. Sorry, my tpiyng apparently sucks today!

    ETA: I can't get the quotes to come up as quotes, so the part I've quoted I edtied to put in italics. Hope that makes it clear, since for whatever reason the nesting quote function isn't working.
    Last edited by bessie; 09-24-2011 at 01:25 AM. Reason: fixed broken quote



Similar Threads

  1. NH NH - Maura Murray, 21, Haverhill, 9 Feb 2004 - #10
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum 2000's Missing
    Replies: 1152
    Last Post: 03-16-2014, 09:49 AM
  2. NH NH - Maura Murray, 21, Haverhill, 9 Feb 2004 - # 9
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum 2000's Missing
    Replies: 1132
    Last Post: 02-09-2014, 10:37 PM
  3. NH NH - Maura Murray, 21, Haverhill, 9 Feb 2004 - # 7
    By Cubby in forum 2000's Missing
    Replies: 861
    Last Post: 08-02-2011, 08:34 PM
  4. NH NH - Maura Murray, 21, Haverhill, 9 Feb 2004 - # 6
    By Peabody in forum 2000's Missing
    Replies: 541
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 12:53 PM
  5. NH NH - Maura Murray, 21, Haverhill, 9 Feb 2004 - # 2
    By CW in forum 2000's Missing
    Replies: 300
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 01:23 AM

Tags for this Thread