Page 8 of 49 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 732
  1. #106
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    Yet another article with info we haven't heard before. I am surprised to see it in The Daily Beast. I'm a subscriber so my version may be customized, not sure; but on my end LS is the first U.S. News article, even before Bill Clinton. This is an exclusive interview with CS by Evie Salomon, the IDS writer who posted the commentary the other day.

    About the perp: “I don’t have a visual; I just wonder what this person’s doing with himself all day every day …"

    About JW: “He is still close to us, and I feel bad that he’s suffering,” CS added.

    "And despite Spierer’s disappearance, several persons of interest have been spotted at football tailgates and around campus drinking and partying. RS questioned how people involved in the case could so easily reengage themselves in normal life."

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...interview.html
    Found it interesting that this article quotes CR lawyer saying CR had bruises on his face since we have an article in the journal news saying A friend said Rossman looked groggy but OK several hours afterward and was aware that Spierer was missing.Said he ran into Rossman at a CVS pharmacy the afternoon of June 3 and saw no redness or bruising on his face.Seams like their is someone to contradict every statement this lawyer makes.
    Last edited by phantomthought; 09-24-2011 at 10:30 AM. Reason: grammer
    Everybody cooperates,but nobody talks.


  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to phantomthought For This Useful Post:


  3. #107
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,355
    And what of Jesse Wolff, Spierer’s boyfriend of two years. whose friends allegedly attacked Corey Rossman? By Charlene and Robert’s account, Wolff had a healthy relationship with their daughter, and both parents are supporting him.

    “He spent many nights at our house and Lauren spent many nights at his house. They were very close,” Robert Spierer said.

    “He is still close to us, and I feel bad that he’s suffering,” Charlene Spierer added.
    This is probably worth quoting in full, since many of us have speculated about the seemingly tense relationship between JW and the Spierers and JW and Lauren's relationship. I'm glad to see their take on things.


  4. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to AbbeyR For This Useful Post:


  5. #108
    My key takeaway from the article (aside from the JW stuff, which was obvious to me a long time ago): "There is nothing to prove that Spierer was high or drunk that night, but there is proof to support that she was hanging out with a fast crowd."

    It should be noted that this is the author's statement, not the family's. And it may be incorrect: the video of her stumbling would seem to be to the contrary.

    But it does suggest the possibility that, while there are people who have testified (in the colloquial sense at least) to the habits of the people involved, no one in a position to know (meaning none of the POIs) has been willing to talk about the drinking/drugs that were done that night. That suggests in turn that the POIs (to the extent they are knowledgeable) may regard this as the, or one, cause of death, and one for which they may be responsible.


  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


  7. #109
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomthought View Post
    Found it interesting that this article quotes CR lawyer saying CR had bruises on his face since we have an article in the journal news saying A friend said Rossman looked groggy but OK several hours afterward and was aware that Spierer was missing.Said he ran into Rossman at a CVS pharmacy the afternoon of June 3 and saw no redness or bruising on his face.Seams like their is someone to contradict every statement this lawyer makes.
    I believe the article in question was the one that had an obviously incorrect date and might have meant to refer to June 4th (or 3rd, correct, but it said "4th"). Not that this necessarily makes a difference with regard to bruising.


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


  9. #110
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by CanManEh View Post
    I do not speak for anyone else obviousilly but I have to say from my own perspective I have almost completely stoped coming and reading this thread and this case all together now because of the use of just the initals and short form and internet lingo its made tchis ase way to confusing ...
    Please don't feel discouraged about contributing to this discussion. If you're willing to spend the time and energy to help a cause, that type of dedication tends to pay off or make a difference in some small way. Here's a link (story dated 6/30) that should help to serve as 'cheat sheet' regarding individuals connected to this case: http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/sto...qp-0075723.sto


  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IUGrad84 For This Useful Post:


  11. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by AnalyticalExaminer View Post
    it does suggest the possibility that, while there are people who have testified (in the colloquial sense at least) to the habits of the people involved, no one in a position to know (meaning none of the POIs) has been willing to talk about the drinking/drugs that were done that night. That suggests in turn that the POIs (to the extent they are knowledgeable) may regard this as the, or one, cause of death, and one for which they may be responsible.
    I should add that if LS started "partying" before she left SW (an assumption, but one that I believe to be correct based on what I've read elsewhere), that group may include DR and perhaps HT, though I believe at least one person at SW has talked to non-LE sources on this topic, which suggests that they may have also talked to LE. Again, this could be a semantic issue or an error on the part of the author's.


  12. The Following User Says Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


  13. #112
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Based on a photo in this video (made for the Spierer's and shown at the concert) I would say DR is in their good graces. It's a beautiful photo of DR and Lauren that IMO communicates friendship, love, trust, warmth, protection.

    http://maloriejanasek.com/


    This is not the "documentary" video shown at the opening of the concert.


  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  15. #113
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,355
    Is there any evidence whatsoever to suggest that DB was at JR's that night? Not in Bloomington, but actually at JR's, Sports or with Lauren at any time? Or is the "MPOI" status still based on Chickjustin's facebook/ twitter sleuthing alone?


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to AbbeyR For This Useful Post:


  17. #114
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by AbbeyR View Post
    Is there any evidence whatsoever to suggest that DB was at JR's that night? Not in Bloomington, but actually at JR's, Sports or with Lauren at any time? Or is the "MPOI" status still based on Chickjustin's facebook/ twitter sleuthing alone?
    None that I am aware of, but I *think* AE said he believes it (DB was JR's guest that night) based on a comment made by a poster on a different form.


  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  19. #115
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by AnalyticalExaminer View Post
    My key takeaway from the article (aside from the JW stuff, which was obvious to me a long time ago): "There is nothing to prove that Spierer was high or drunk that night, but there is proof to support that she was hanging out with a fast crowd."

    It should be noted that this is the author's statement, not the family's. And it may be incorrect: the video of her stumbling would seem to be to the contrary.

    But it does suggest the possibility that, while there are people who have testified (in the colloquial sense at least) to the habits of the people involved, no one in a position to know (meaning none of the POIs) has been willing to talk about the drinking/drugs that were done that night. That suggests in turn that the POIs (to the extent they are knowledgeable) may regard this as the, or one, cause of death, and one for which they may be responsible.
    Is it is necessary to prove Lauren was on drugs because someone likely gave her these drugs, she didn't obtain them on her own; therefore, someone is responsible and someone knows something, yes? Without evidence of drug use, there is no drug supplier, there is no criminal, no crime...no Lauren.


  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  21. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    Based on a photo in this video (made for the Spierer's and shown at the concert) I would say DR is in their good graces. It's a beautiful photo of DR and Lauren that IMO communicates friendship, love, trust, warmth, protection.

    http://maloriejanasek.com/


    This is not the "documentary" video shown at the opening of the concert.
    Thanks. I also see HT (repeatedly), JW (more than once), and an apparent buddy of DR's there as well. I should add that in the early interview, DR's demeanor suggested to me that he was a well-meaning dude truly concerned about finding LS.


  22. The Following User Says Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


  23. #117
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    None that I am aware of, but I *think* AE said he believes it (DB was JR's guest that night) based on a comment made by a poster on a different form.
    I believe it based on their high school, fraternity, twitter, and close facebook connections, in combination with HT's statement that JR had a guest from home. I wasn't aware that CJ had produced any evidence other than the Btown tweet (not the twitter connection), if that's in fact the case.


  24. The Following User Says Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


  25. #118
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Who Dat Nation
    Posts
    24,835
    In reply to questions regarding the use of initials versus names, in the opening post of each thread in this case is a link to "Who's Who in the Lauren Spierer Case". Included are Lauren's parents, friends who have spoken to media, and individuals LE has established were in Lauren's company the night she disappeared and/or their attorneys. The parties in that article can be referenced by name, but the use of initials is preferred out of respect for their privacy. If you put yourself in their shoes I'm sure you'll agree that is only fair. Each time a name is posted the chances of it turning up in a search are increased, and innocent parties should not be forever linked to a disappearance or crime of which they had no part. Individuals mentioned in blogs and other message boards who have not been established by LE as being involved in Lauren's case can be referenced here only by their initials. As always, please proceed with caution. The above is standard WS policy for all cases.

    Each member has the responsibility to familiarize him/herself with the rules and policies of this site. To make it as easy as possible for the many new members following this case, a list of things to know about posting is in the OP. Links to TOS and Threadiquette are included, as well. If you're still in doubt, address your question to a mod in a pm. This ensures that your question will be answered in a timely manner. Posting questions about rules in the thread interrupts the flow of the discussion. Moderators have the option to remove these posts where they see fit. Please remember that if you reply to a post that is later removed, your post is subject to removal as well.

    After a rocky start, Lauren's threads have been moving along smoothly lately. Thanks to all of you for doing a great job and for your dedication to bringing Lauren home.
    __________________________________
    Muddy water in the street
    ; Muddy water 'round my feet... as sung by the inimitable Bessie Smith, "Muddy Water (A Mississippi Moan)"

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK




  26. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to bessie For This Useful Post:


  27. #119
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,355
    Quote Originally Posted by AnalyticalExaminer View Post
    I believe it based on their high school, fraternity, twitter, and close facebook connections, in combination with HT's statement that JR had a guest from home. I wasn't aware that CJ had produced any evidence other than the Btown tweet (not the twitter connection), if that's in fact the case.
    You believe that he was visiting JR, or that he was specifically around that night and involved? I'm just wondering because despite all of the rumors about this case, I have not heard anyone suggest that DB was actually there (with Lauren and JR) or seen any indication that he is on the radar of LE, the media, or really anything at all to suggest he is a POI.


  28. The Following User Says Thank You to AbbeyR For This Useful Post:


  29. #120
    Quote Originally Posted by AbbeyR View Post
    You believe that he was visiting JR, or that he was specifically around that night and involved? I'm just wondering because despite all of the rumors about this case, I have not heard anyone suggest that DB was actually there (with Lauren and JR) or seen any indication that he is on the radar of LE, the media, or really anything at all to suggest he is a POI.
    I believe that he was visiting JR that night, per HT's comment. He tweeted that he was still in Btown the next morning/afternoon.

    LE has said that there are about 10 POI, and that there may be POI who were not known to LS.


  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AnalyticalExaminer For This Useful Post:


Page 8 of 49 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #22
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum Lauren Spierer
    Replies: 803
    Last Post: 08-29-2011, 03:33 AM
  2. Replies: 655
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 03:19 AM
  3. Replies: 639
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 09:32 AM
  4. IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 #11
    By bessie in forum Lauren Spierer
    Replies: 737
    Last Post: 06-26-2011, 12:05 PM
  5. Replies: 707
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 08:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •