Page 17 of 51 FirstFirst ... 7 15 16 17 18 19 27 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 765
  1. #241
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    -Metro NYC
    Posts
    4,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    A new interview. I think this is the second one the Spierer's have done since they've been back in New York. It's obvious they are trying to draw CR out of his cave.

    Highlights: Robert says CR has not talked to the police at all. This is contrary to what was said early in the investigation. I recall it was reported he was cooperative and allowed searches of his apt, car, and credit card. Robert also said that Dietl has obtained info that the police do not have.

    http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/pare...k-out-20111219

    Such a sad time for them. They are so committed it must be easier for them to do events and interviews than to disengage at this time.
    Got to wonder what Bo Dietl is finding in this case. I believe PI are often good at getting info that LE is unable to get because PI's are able to hangout and circulate better and get more "off the record" kind of info.

    Here's a recent interview with Bo about the Long Is. Killings to give an idea what he like:


    http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/good_day_...dietl-20111216
    "oldsteve" - no relation to anyone outside this forum, and what I write is meant only for Websleuths.



  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to OldSteve For This Useful Post:


  3. #242
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by OldSteve View Post
    Got to wonder what Bo Dietl is finding in this case. I believe PI are often good at getting info that LE is unable to get because PI's are able to hangout and circulate better and get more "off the record" kind of info.
    I figure it's info from the kids who were at Sports and the altercation, basically the secondary tier.

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSteve View Post
    Here's a recent interview with Bo about the Long Is. Killings to give an idea what he like:


    http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/good_day_...dietl-20111216
    He is so crude and irreverent it's hard for me to focus on what he says. But that may be an occupational hazard given the seasoned territory he's worked in. The LI case, good grief it's like a killing field.

    But the two anchors, yikes, they are airheads. They ask unanswerable questions: How long do you think it will take? and Do you think there are other bodies to be found?

    One thing I was thinking about recently relates to what Dietl said "You never want to eliminate anything." In Lauren's case, it would be JW.


  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  5. #243
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    This just in (I have Google alerts):

    Fox59 spoke with Dietl on the phone and asked when the public will learn the new information he has uncovered. He was not willing to give us a time table.

    Corey Rossman, issued a statement through his attorney.

    I pray for them every night, said Rossman. I feel sorry for them. I want to help them find Lauren. (As far as a polygraph), Im not going to get them to bait me into commenting.


    http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-spier...,511676.column


  6. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  7. #244
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Who Dat Nation
    Posts
    5,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    A new interview. I think this is the second one the Spierer's have done since they've been back in New York. It's obvious they are trying to draw CR out of his cave.

    Highlights: Robert says CR has not talked to the police at all. This is contrary to what was said early in the investigation. I recall it was reported he was cooperative and allowed searches of his apt, car, and credit card. Robert also said that Dietl has obtained info that the police do not have.

    http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/pare...k-out-20111219

    Such a sad time for them. They are so committed it must be easier for them to do events and interviews than to disengage at this time.
    I feel more than ever at whomever is responsible for making these people suffer.
    now an official Penn State alum!

    Kindness is magic. (Derek)

    @JaneDoe25 (Twitter) <~~~ videos & pics of Harry right here


  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PlainJaneDoe For This Useful Post:


  9. #245
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bloomington IN
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    Robert also said that Dietl has obtained info that the police do not have.
    I would think that this would give the guilty parties a case of the jitters...


  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to bloom54 For This Useful Post:


  11. #246
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Who Dat Nation
    Posts
    24,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    This just in (I have Google alerts):

    Fox59 spoke with Dietl on the phone and asked when the public will learn the new information he has uncovered. He was not willing to give us a time table.

    Corey Rossman, issued a statement through his attorney.

    I pray for them every night, said Rossman. I feel sorry for them. I want to help them find Lauren. (As far as a polygraph), Im not going to get them to bait me into commenting.


    http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-spier...,511676.column
    I'm overwhelmed by his sincerity.
    __________________________________
    Muddy water in the street
    ; Muddy water 'round my feet... as sung by the inimitable Bessie Smith, "Muddy Water (A Mississippi Moan)"

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK




  12. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to bessie For This Useful Post:


  13. #247
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    This just in (I have Google alerts):

    Fox59 spoke with Dietl on the phone and asked when the public will learn the new information he has uncovered. He was not willing to give us a time table.

    Corey Rossman, issued a statement through his attorney.

    I pray for them every night, said Rossman. I feel sorry for them. I want to help them find Lauren. (As far as a polygraph), Im not going to get them to bait me into commenting.


    http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-spier...,511676.column
    Boy, he has me in tears with that last bit...NOT.
    Just my opinion, of course.


  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cluciano63 For This Useful Post:


  15. #248
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    This just in (I have Google alerts):

    Fox59 spoke with Dietl on the phone and asked when the public will learn the new information he has uncovered. He was not willing to give us a time table.

    Corey Rossman, issued a statement through his attorney.

    I pray for them every night, said Rossman. I feel sorry for them. I want to help them find Lauren. (As far as a polygraph), Im not going to get them to bait me into commenting.


    http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-spier...,511676.column
    The Bloomington Herald Times reports that Rossman's attorney denies making the statement reported above:
    "Carl Salzmann... told The Herald-Times Tuesday night that he and his client continue to cooperate with police, 'and I hope we find her as soon as we can.'

    Salzmann said other media reports that Rossman had issued a statement through him Tuesday were incorrect. "
    http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/sto...nformation.sto


  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ros For This Useful Post:


  17. #249
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    729
    Quote Originally Posted by Ros View Post
    The Bloomington Herald Times reports that Rossman's attorney denies making the statement reported above:
    "Carl Salzmann... told The Herald-Times Tuesday night that he and his client continue to cooperate with police, 'and I hope we find her as soon as we can.'

    Salzmann said other media reports that Rossman had issued a statement through him Tuesday were incorrect. "
    http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/sto...nformation.sto
    If the comment reported was supposed to be a statement released thru the atty then I can believe what Salzmann is saying. That sounds like an off the cuff remark, not something you'd put on paper, proof-read, think about, and then read or even paraphrase.

    I don't have a problem with what was said per se'... and anyone who reads it and suddenly has their guilt scales tipping his way should understand that is why the boy's aren't speaking because one bad turn of phrase and suddenly the guilt meter points to them. ...whether that is deserved or not.

    It almost sounds like an off the record type remark given to a reporter to help clear up something the reporter had wrong or to point the reporter in a certain direction.


  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to akh For This Useful Post:


  19. #250
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by akh View Post
    If the comment reported was supposed to be a statement released thru the atty then I can believe what Salzmann is saying. That sounds like an off the cuff remark, not something you'd put on paper, proof-read, think about, and then read or even paraphrase.

    I don't have a problem with what was said per se'... and anyone who reads it and suddenly has their guilt scales tipping his way should understand that is why the boy's aren't speaking because one bad turn of phrase and suddenly the guilt meter points to them. ...whether that is deserved or not.

    It almost sounds like an off the record type remark given to a reporter to help clear up something the reporter had wrong or to point the reporter in a certain direction.
    I don't think it sounds like anything other than what it is: a disingenuous, insincere attempt to pity the parents and then stick it to them with that last bit to make them look like the bad guys.

    He has had over six months to think through and prepare a statement and this is the best he can do? At the least he could have prepared something more meaningful before he agreed to the interview. Maybe this is as good as it gets with Mr. Sketchy.


  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


  21. #251
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Who Dat Nation
    Posts
    5,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    A new interview. I think this is the second one the Spierer's have done since they've been back in New York. It's obvious they are trying to draw CR out of his cave.

    Highlights: Robert says CR has not talked to the police at all. This is contrary to what was said early in the investigation. I recall it was reported he was cooperative and allowed searches of his apt, car, and credit card. Robert also said that Dietl has obtained info that the police do not have.

    http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/pare...k-out-20111219

    Such a sad time for them. They are so committed it must be easier for them to do events and interviews than to disengage at this time.
    I know I commented on the interview last night, but I have more to say.

    First, I know this is obvious to everyone, so bear with me for a sec...it is so freaking unfair that they are not celebrating Chanukah with their daughter. It's just not right. This time of year is about family, food, and light. (See, I told you it was obvious.)

    Second, the part about Bo Dietl...I realize that the Spierers had said earlier in the interview that they didn't have specific leads, but poster above is correct in saying that it would probably make people squirm. R. says he has stuff different from what police know, and he's not gonna say what that stuff is. If I was in any way involved in this situation, I would be a wreck after hearing that.

    Third, at the very end of the interview, when C. was talking about many missing people who are never found, I had this mental image of her looking at a site like Doe Network or Charley Project...page after page after page of unexplained disappearances.
    now an official Penn State alum!

    Kindness is magic. (Derek)

    @JaneDoe25 (Twitter) <~~~ videos & pics of Harry right here


  22. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PlainJaneDoe For This Useful Post:


  23. #252
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    729
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter812 View Post
    I don't think it sounds like anything other than what it is: a disingenuous, insincere attempt to pity the parents and then stick it to them with that last bit to make them look like the bad guys.

    He has had over six months to think through and prepare a statement and this is the best he can do? At the least he could have prepared something more meaningful before he agreed to the interview. Maybe this is as good as it gets with Mr. Sketchy.
    I could be missing something since I haven't clicked any video links and am just reading text, but if the comment was always supposed to have been a statement released by CR's attorney, and CR's attorney is directly denying he released such a statement then it only makes sense 1 of 2 things is happening:

    Either the atty is flat out lying, or else he gave an off the cuff (possibly off the record) answer to a reporter who misinterpreted it as a statement released by CR.

    Reading the comment it in no way looks like it would be a statement that CR would release thru his atty. It's clearly not prepared or polished. It does read like an off the cuff remark the atty might make to a reporter not meant to be directly quoted but meant to help the reporter sort some things out.

    So the question I have, and maybe you know the answer to this, is the statement supposed to have come directly from CR to the reporter or is it supposed to have been released from the atty?


  24. The Following User Says Thank You to akh For This Useful Post:


  25. #253
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    533
    Quote Originally Posted by akh View Post
    So the question I have, and maybe you know the answer to this, is the statement supposed to have come directly from CR to the reporter or is it supposed to have been released from the atty?

    Corey Rossman, issued a statement through his attorney.

    This tells me that the attorney gave (verbally or red) the statement. Having said that, the press could be wrong. The word "baited" sure sounds like the wording of an attorney, though, as opposed to a college kid. I have a son about his age. He'd never use the word "baited" (unless of course he was coached to do so). That said, the blatant disrespect does not seem to me to be the tone Salzman would want to take, especially at this time. Therefore, I believe this was either an "off the cuff" remark, made in jest, to a reporter OR it wasn't said (or was sad and twisted). I don't think any attorney would use this tone at this point, nor do I think that is the wording of CR.


  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gabby66 For This Useful Post:


  27. #254
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,355
    Quote Originally Posted by akh View Post
    It does read like an off the cuff remark the atty might make to a reporter not meant to be directly quoted...
    This is what I assumed. While it doesn't seem like the kind of quote they would have wanted published, it does seem telling. All the POI seem to be very concerned with being portrayed as wanting to help the Spierers... just not concerned enough to, you know, actually help.

    Seeing the Spierers' heartbroken faces on that video made me so sad, along with PJD's post above. Happy Hannukah to those of you who are celebrating -- and wishes for hope and peace to anyone who might be missing loved ones over the holidays.


  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AbbeyR For This Useful Post:


  29. #255
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by akh View Post
    I could be missing something since I haven't clicked any video links and am just reading text, but if the comment was always supposed to have been a statement released by CR's attorney, and CR's attorney is directly denying he released such a statement then it only makes sense 1 of 2 things is happening:

    Either the atty is flat out lying, or else he gave an off the cuff (possibly off the record) answer to a reporter who misinterpreted it as a statement released by CR.

    Reading the comment it in no way looks like it would be a statement that CR would release thru his atty. It's clearly not prepared or polished. It does read like an off the cuff remark the atty might make to a reporter not meant to be directly quoted but meant to help the reporter sort some things out.

    So the question I have, and maybe you know the answer to this, is the statement supposed to have come directly from CR to the reporter or is it supposed to have been released from the atty?
    Hard to say since Salzmann claims he didn't issue it. But certainly CR didn't agree to the interview w/o Salzmann's blessing. I can believe the report sequenced CR's comments for dramatic effect, especially since FOX news is notorious for this--and the parentheses is weird too. I have no problem believing CR used "bait" with such negative connotation. I figured he was parroting something his parents might have said after seeing the Spierer's interview.

    Edited to add: Notice how FOX headlined the article, "The Spierer's said there are new developments in the case that could soon be released." The certainly did not say this on air and I get the sneaking suspicion they didn't say this off air either. I think FOX is making up the "soon" part.
    Last edited by Jupiter812; 12-21-2011 at 11:00 PM.


  30. The Following User Says Thank You to Jupiter812 For This Useful Post:


Page 17 of 51 FirstFirst ... 7 15 16 17 18 19 27 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 827
    Last Post: 09-21-2011, 02:53 PM
  2. Replies: 604
    Last Post: 07-30-2011, 07:26 PM
  3. Replies: 621
    Last Post: 07-10-2011, 04:33 PM
  4. Replies: 538
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 06:44 PM
  5. Replies: 635
    Last Post: 06-21-2011, 02:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •