1561 users online (256 members and 1305 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 87 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1297
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    424

    Cell Phone Activity Timeline as of 11/11

    Link-
    Bradley & Irwin lawyer John Picerno on Megyn Kelly Fox Show. 2 videos on the page. Article highlights:

    11:57pm - 50 second call to MW phone number
    3:17am - attempt to get into voicemail and use internet
    3:22am - attempt to get into voicemail and use internet
    Pings were never more than 1/3 of the mile from Irwin residence. It does not give a time when the pings stopped.

    The 2:30am phone call was a rumor.

    It is also not mentioned whether this was DB's broken cell or the one she received from her grandfather on Oct. 3rd.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Glasgow,Scotland UK
    Posts
    22,764
    has anyone else heard anything about the cell phone pings? i read something in an article but i don't know if its been posted on any MSM websites


    OMG I never read that post right,i am literally losing my marbles over here!!!
    All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; The point is to discover them.



    Jodi Ann Arias - GUILTY 1st Degree Murder

    Sentence - LIFE Without Parole

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    46,772
    What about the 8:30 call? Another rumor or mistake?
    “Every day that they don’t find something is good for me.“ Billie Dunn

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a little west of southern hospitality.
    Posts
    2,199
    I should probably make aware that I haven't been able to find LE releasing this timeline of the Irwin phones. It was released via their spokesperson on a new segment of Fox prior, but just a tad before their attorney said in an interview that they were considered suspects.

    links:
    http://video.foxnews.com/v/1270739314001/

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-bab...OjWDZzUU%22%5D


    LE, from what I have concluded, hasn't said anything today to any media what-so-ever.

    At this point, I am so very weary on what I read, see or listen to in this case -- and I find that such a shame.

    I am only left to pray for little Lisa.
    Last edited by sherbetjello; 11-11-2011 at 09:49 PM. Reason: I am so bad at linking.
    "Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they are open." - James Dewar

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,157
    Quote Originally Posted by w1df10wr View Post
    Link-
    Bradley & Irwin lawyer John Picerno on Megyn Kelly Fox Show. 2 videos on the page. Article highlights:

    11:57pm - 50 second call to MW phone number
    3:17am - attempt to get into voicemail and use internet
    3:22am - attempt to get into voicemail and use internet
    Pings were never more than 1/3 of the mile from Irwin residence. It does not give a time when the pings stopped.

    The 2:30am phone call was a rumor.

    It is also not mentioned whether this was DB's broken cell or the one she received from her grandfather on Oct. 3rd.
    THANK YOU wildflower! and just in time for us needing a new cell phone thread! Great timeline!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,157
    http://www.freemaptools.com/radius-a...lw=1&fc=00FF00

    link to 1/3 mile radius map I did from 3620 north lister

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sparklin
    I've seen plenty of tears and grief from these parents. And when I do, it breaks my heart, but to others, it's fake. Like I said elsewhere, it doesn't matter what they do, what they or their lawyers say, it's all a 'spin' or 'fake' or 'contrived'...there are those that can't (or won't) be open to any possibility that these parents had nothing to do with their daughter being missing. Regardless of anything that is said or done, it's either not enough or too much.

    I'm not saying they are totally innocent. I hope with all my heart 100% that they are. I will believe it until proven otherwise. I can rake them over the coals and stomp on them at that time. For now, I will support and trust that they did nothing. I'm not willing to add to a families grief by attacking them for things that are, at this point, speculation and innuendo. IMO

    ETA: Tara McDonald didn't shed a tear in public - her timeline changed, she hid things, she failed a lie detector test, she was accused by LE and the public at large...yet she was innocent!
    Originally Posted by Kamille

    BBM

    I see a lot of things in this case that seem to point to DB's possible involvement in Lisa's disappearance. And every time I do, I keep thinking of Tara and how guilty she seemed because of the other things she was trying to hide. I wish DB had her strength to get in front of the camera's every day regardless of what people are saying about her and keep Lisa's story front and center. Not doing that is what disturbs me the most about her behaviour.

    MOO
    I was struck by the similarities on the fb pages right away. I was on the other side last time...not making that mistake again
    Praying for our lost babies ~ Come home Lisa!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,750
    MK: And then the next phone record that evening shows that somebody attempted to call DB's voicemail at 3:17 and 3:22am?

    JP: That is correct. Along with the fact that the internet browser was activated 5 times although from the records you can't tell exactly the time that the buttons were pushed to search the internet.

    MK: so was the internet successfully accessed, do we know?

    JP: I believe so. I don't believe that there would be a record of it.


    Taken from an excellent transcript of the cell phone part of the interview by askfornina on the previous cell phone thread...

    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7341746&postcount=306"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Missing Cell Phones #2[/ame]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,750
    Quote Originally Posted by katydid23 View Post
    What about the 8:30 call? Another rumor or mistake?
    More like a very smart tactic by the FBI to get MW to admit that while she did not have her phone at 8:30pm, she did get it back in time for the actual 11:57pm call.

    MOO

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    In the sweet Carolina pines
    Posts
    3,724
    Why would anyone with a smart phone dial *86 to access their voice mail?


    A proud decedent of The Declaration of Independence signer.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamille View Post
    MK: And then the next phone record that evening shows that somebody attempted to call DB's voicemail at 3:17 and 3:22am?

    JP: That is correct. Along with the fact that the internet browser was activated 5 times although from the records you can't tell exactly the time that the buttons were pushed to search the internet.

    MK: so was the internet successfully accessed, do we know?

    JP: I believe so. I don't believe that there would be a record of it.


    Taken from an excellent transcript of the cell phone part of the interview by askfornina on the previous cell phone thread...

    Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Missing Cell Phones #2
    Thank you Kamille, I hadn't seen that post.

    from askfornina's transcript in the link~thank you~ - "She recieved a uh, her husband, uh not her husband, her fiance Jeremy tried to contact her early in the evening to tell her that he was going to be late coming home, it went direct to the verizon message, stating that the phone is not operable." - new lawyer JP

    People Magazine 10/31/11 newsstand edition pg 49 "And because they hadn't paid their cell phone bill and their service had been restricted, Irwin wasn't able to let Bradley know when he'd be home."

    It doesn't make sense why there are 2 versions about this?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamille View Post
    MK: And then the next phone record that evening shows that somebody attempted to call DB's voicemail at 3:17 and 3:22am?

    JP: That is correct. Along with the fact that the internet browser was activated 5 times although from the records you can't tell exactly the time that the buttons were pushed to search the internet.

    MK: so was the internet successfully accessed, do we know?

    JP: I believe so. I don't believe that there would be a record of it.


    Taken from an excellent transcript of the cell phone part of the interview by askfornina on the previous cell phone thread...

    Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Missing Cell Phones #2
    First, JP claims the phone could receive incoming calls and then later he claims the voice mail didn't work because the phone service was "off." Pure spin....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,380
    Quote Originally Posted by 3doglady View Post
    Why would anyone with a smart phone dial *86 to access their voice mail?
    Was it a smart phone?

    I didn't know that *86 was the way to dial voicemail (for Verizon). I've only had T-mobile and Sprint and it's always been dial 1. Hmmm. . .but that doesn't mean it's not common knowledge though. . .just new to me.

    I have to say, I'm really I'm not sure what to think about all this new phone info. Does this now mean that the sighting by MT can't be possible? Wouldn't that be outside of the ping area? And the timing would make it seem impossible if someone was on foot. I never put much faith in that sighting anyway, but it's all interesting.

    This does seem to support the SODDI theory.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,380
    double post

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9,524
    Quote Originally Posted by w1df10wr View Post
    Thank you Kamille, I hadn't seen that post.

    from askfornina's transcript in the link~thank you~ - "She recieved a uh, her husband, uh not her husband, her fiance Jeremy tried to contact her early in the evening to tell her that he was going to be late coming home, it went direct to the verizon message, stating that the phone is not operable." - new lawyer JP

    People Magazine 10/31/11 newsstand edition pg 49 "And because they hadn't paid their cell phone bill and their service had been restricted, Irwin wasn't able to let Bradley know when he'd be home."

    It doesn't make sense why there are 2 versions about this?
    The lawyer seems totally unaware of what his clients have already said. They started out saying the phones didn't work and implied cops were lying about the pings and burned clothing.

    JMO

Page 1 of 87 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Cell Phone Activity Discussion Thread #2
    By ynotdivein in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 948
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 12:45 PM
  2. Cell Phone Found Under Mattress in Charles Manson's Cell
    By angelwngs in forum The Manson Family
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 07:18 PM

Tags for this Thread