1236 users online (244 members and 992 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 5 of 54 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 810
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandstorm View Post
    Backwoods,
    I appreciate your honesty and respect your opinion in the following post # 14:

    "Because I'm not, this is maybe going to be a delicate time for me to continue posting here, though I want to. So, I just want to say something upfront here -- and this is to everyone -- I am not here to argue SM's innocence -- I don't feel I am privy to enough of the evidence to make me (and I'm just talking me here, not anyone else) feel justified to argue that any more than I feel I am privy to enough to argue his guilt. I am just still looking at all the angles I can find, indictment or no.

    I want to know who killed Lauren, and under what circumstances. I want to follow this case as closely as I can, and WebSleuths is the best place I know of to do that, and I will continue trying to contribute here as best as I conscientiously can."

    (snipped)

    However, on the other hand, I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that McD is the perpetrator.
    It is very difficult for me to wrap my mind around ANYONE committing this crime, but having read some of the suggested reading on Websleuth, I think I have a better idea of how a sociopath thinks.

    Most enlightening: The Sociopath Next Door by Dr. Martha Stout.
    I recommend this book if you have not read it yet.


    OH MY GOSH < YES< HIGHLY recommended. Helped me through some crazy things. I still can't wrap my mind around how they think but understand it better now, MUCH BETTER. This book is a must read for ANYONE. I supposed because I can't think like a sociopath though understand them better it's hard , very hard, to see MCD having done this. But I know the time will tell if there is any doubt.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12,992
    Quote Originally Posted by bessie View Post
    respectfully snipped

    The things we mods do for you guys. Just kidding. I was curious, myself, so I did compare the two, and yes, the original seven appear to be included in the indictment. Since the warrant doesn't include file names, I can't be sure, but the descriptions do match seven named in the indictment.

    FWIW, I'm reserving judgment on the CP charges. It's no secret that I'm 99% convinced of McD's guilt in Lauren's murder. And if he could murder and dismember a neighbor and fellow student who was kind to him, he's capable of anything. But I'm skeptical about how those files came to be on his computer and/or flash drive. If they were embedded in files he downloaded, and he transferred those files to his flash drive, wouldn't the embedded files go along?
    BBM- I agree with you Bessie. I'm not convinced the CP was intentionally downloaded and kept for viewing by McD.

    I think we have discussed intentional vs. non-intentional downloads, but I don't think we ever nailed down an answer. It seems to me that an IT Professional who is knowledgeable about such things, would be able to differentiate between the two.

    On another note; I'm looking forward to his arraignment in a few weeks. Buford says McD is in good spirits, I'd like to see for myself what his demeanor is. The last time we saw him in court he acted like a zombie
    You are the anchor to my soul, you won't let go ...

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    central Georgia, USA
    Posts
    4,658
    While I have, I guess, a basic understanding of how grand juries work in the function of indicting someone, I sure don't understand all the subtleties and right now I have some questions I'd like to ask someone who feels knowledgeable enough to tackle. They are sort of general questions but of course, right now, they're focused in the direction of this case.

    Maybe some of you who have followed a lot of cases can help, or even some of you who have served on a grand jury (without breaking any kind of oath, of course). I've never served on a grand jury myself.

    First, with this case -- in the video at this link...
    http://www.13wmaz.com/news/article/1...iddings-Murder
    ...the reporter says that Tuesday morning DA Winters and Detective Patterson spent about 30 minutes with the GJ, then a little over an hour went by before the GJ handed up (or down or whatever -- never have been sure of the correct term, LOL) the indictment.

    I'm used to hearing that a trial jury spent thus-and-so hours pondering its verdict, but hearing time things about a GJ is kind of new to me. I know every case is different, but does anyone know if the spans reported are pretty typical? Does 30 minutes seem about what y'all would expect it to take to present the essentials of this case? Also -- after speaking, presenting, etc. in person, would the DA and detective then probably have left materials with the GJ to refer to while they deliberated (if that's the right word to use in speaking of a GJ)?

    Second -- I can't find a clear answer on whether the prosecution is required to present any exculpatory evidence (or any "substantial exculpatory evidence", as I'm seeing in some sources) it might possess to the GJ. I'm seeing in some references that yes, it is required to; in others, no, definitely not -- can't get it figured out. Does it vary from state to state, from federal courts to state courts ...? Can anybody address this?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by Backwoods; 11-18-2011 at 02:41 AM. Reason: add word

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Backwoods View Post
    While I have, I guess, a basic understanding of how grand juries work in the function of indicting someone, I sure don't understand all the subtleties and right now I have some questions I'd like to ask someone who feels knowledgeable enough to tackle. They are sort of general questions but of course, right now, they're focused in the direction of this case.

    Maybe some of you who have followed a lot of cases can help, or even some of you who have served on a grand jury (without breaking any kind of oath, of course). I've never served on a grand jury myself.

    First, with this case -- in the video at this link...
    http://www.13wmaz.com/news/article/1...iddings-Murder
    ...the reporter says that Tuesday morning DA Winters and Detective Patterson spent about 30 minutes with the GJ, then a little over an hour went by before the GJ handed up (or down or whatever -- never have been sure of the correct term, LOL) the indictment.

    I'm used to hearing that a trial jury spent thus-and-so hours pondering its verdict, but hearing time things about a GJ is kind of new to me. I know every case is different, but does anyone know if the spans reported are pretty typical? Does 30 minutes seem about what y'all would expect it to take to present the essentials of this case? Also -- after speaking, presenting, etc. in person, would the DA and detective then probably have left materials with the GJ to refer to while they deliberated (if that's the right word to use in speaking of a GJ)?

    Second -- I can't find a clear answer on whether the prosecution is required to present any exculpatory evidence (or "substantial exculpatory evidence", as I'm seeing in some sources) it might possess to the GJ. I'm seeing in some references that yes, it is required to; in others, no, definitely not -- can't get it figured out. Does it vary from state to state, from federal courts to state courts ...? Can anybody address this?

    Thanks!
    I served on my county's grand jury this past August. The procedure was this:
    Police officer presented case history and evidence and answered any questions asked by district attorney.
    Police officers and district attorney and staff left the room, but the bailiff stayed.
    Grand jurors discussed the case as presented in testimony and evidence. Some took longer than others.
    Jury foreman then called for a vote, either true bill or no bill.
    Jury member clerk recorded the information which was then signed by the jury foreman.
    Bailiff then notified police and district attorney that a decision had been reached and they came into the courtroom to hear it.
    Then the next case was called.
    We went through about 19 cases, each one following the steps above.
    The cases presented were not all that complicated except for one which isn't nearly as complicated as SM's case.
    Most cases took about 10 minutes at the most with the more complicated one taking about 20 minutes.
    I personally think a 30 minute presentation of the case against SM gave these jurors quite a bit of info although probably not all LE has, just enough to get an indictment.
    An hour's deliberation by the grand jury makes me think they did not just rubber stamp the DA's decision.
    Also, it did not take a unanimous vote to true bill; it took a majority vote.
    Also, some LE officers made better witnesses than others.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    central Georgia, USA
    Posts
    4,658
    Quote Originally Posted by pearl View Post
    I served on my county's grand jury this past August. The procedure was this:
    <snipped for space>

    Thanks, pearl -- your post was very informative and helpful.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11
    There will be another online chat with the Telegraph reporters today at noon.

    http://www.macon.com/2011/11/22/1796...ings-case.html

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Macon, GA
    Posts
    176
    http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.ph...rand=&replay=y

    Here is link to the live chat transcript. Nothing of interest really. The only thing that caught my eye is that they are working on a story in the coming weeks about the relationship between Lauren and Stephen. Maybe a bit more personal insight from classmates/friends than we've gotten before.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    236
    Yes, there sure were a lot of "We don't know" and "I don't know" responses. Like , why even bother posting the question . I hope they will work on finding out the answers , some of them were pretty good questions:
    Don't know what, if anything, was found inside McD's car.
    Don't know if DA will seek death penalty
    Don't know if anythings been received from the FBI
    Don't know if they found chain mail in McD's apartment
    Don't know if he has seen a psychiatrist
    Don't know the difference between malice murder and felony murder or why GJ indictment differed from original warrant
    Don't know if McD can watch TV
    Don't know what Buford's Private Eye is up to or who he even is
    Don't know if LE has ruled out all other persons of interest.

    But , as said earlier, there will be a story on the relationship between the two , and , if I am reading between the lines correctly it sounds like old Glenda isn't quite so happy to hear her phone ring when its Amy Leigh or Joe on the other end.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    301

    MACON.COM: Sources: Giddings’ garment found

    "Potential evidence in the Lauren Giddings slaying investigation sent to an FBI lab includes a pair of the victim’s underwear discovered in her suspected killer’s apartment, sources familiar with the investigation say."

    Read more: http://www.macon.com/2011/11/23/1797...#ixzz1eW5Mgd1q
    ~ Remembering Lauren, her family & friends ~
    Death leaves a heartache no one can heal, love leaves a memory no one can steal.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,894
    Haven't followed this case at all ... but read the initial comment and recent.

    Sooooo, did the underwear neighbor thief do it, the husband, or a gang? Who is charged?


  11. #71
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    31,575
    Otto, the neighbor has been charged. Not a gang.

    In the first post of the thread is a link to the media thread. If you want to get up to speed on this case, take a quick scroll through and look over the highlights.
    PODCAST ROW

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK
    __________________________________
    Always give generously of yourself to support your beliefs. And when you're knocked down, give more.




  12. #72
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    31,575
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandstorm View Post
    "Potential evidence in the Lauren Giddings slaying investigation sent to an FBI lab includes a pair of the victim’s underwear discovered in her suspected killer’s apartment, sources familiar with the investigation say."

    Read more: http://www.macon.com/2011/11/23/1797...#ixzz1eW5Mgd1q
    Sickening, but can't say I'm surprised. Poor Lauren. She mentioned Macon "hoodlums" in that e-mail to her bf, but I wonder if that wasn't a cover. I mean, was it actually McD she feared? Did she try to brush it off and tell herself she was imagining things? From all we've learned about Lauren, I think she was too astute not to pick up on the vibes that were probably coming through the walls! She must've known and was probably counting the hours until she would be out of there.
    PODCAST ROW

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK
    __________________________________
    Always give generously of yourself to support your beliefs. And when you're knocked down, give more.




  13. #73
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    236
    Methinks this is just the beginning of the stream of evidence we will see about the sick perverted forbidden fruit relationship McD was imagining in his mind with LG

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Macon, GA
    Posts
    264

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by AgentFrankLundy View Post
    Methinks this is just the beginning of the stream of evidence we will see about the sick perverted forbidden fruit relationship McD was imagining in his mind with LG
    Agree. This sounds like build-up to the article about Lauren and SMD's "relationship" that the reporters mentioned they were working on.

    I'm guessing he had the underwear for a while and got it while he was creeping around in her apartment.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Macon, GA
    Posts
    264
    DA Won't Comment on Giddings Evidence
    http://www.13wmaz.com/news/article/1...dings-Evidence

    "District Attorney Greg Winters declined comment. In a text reply to 13WMAZ's Randall Savage, Winters wrote, "No comment. Not very happy that information was leaked."

Page 5 of 54 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 #11
    By bessie in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 623
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 06:04 PM
  2. GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 #10
    By bessie in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 721
    Last Post: 09-01-2011, 02:31 AM
  3. GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 # 6
    By bessie in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 607
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 06:21 AM
  4. GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 # 4
    By bessie in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 675
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 02:44 PM
  5. GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 # 1
    By sue4141 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 587
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 04:51 PM

Tags for this Thread