1263 users online (283 members and 980 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 100
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,489

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/16/11

    Good morning!

    11/16/11

    This thread is for today's MSM links about Baby Lisa. Please keep discussion to a minimum. If a topic needs discussion, please find or create an appropriate thread.

    May today be the day Baby Lisa is found!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,232
    http://www.kmov.com/video/featured-v...133938313.html

    Parallels between Affton and KC baby disappearances .
    KMOV.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,372
    Brief segment on GMA.

    Nothing new reported. JT said again that DB/JI will not be answering any more questions from LE and that they've already answered every question 5 times.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,372
    Quote Originally Posted by saba View Post
    http://www.kmov.com/video/featured-v...133938313.html

    Parallels between Affton and KC baby disappearances .
    KMOV.com
    Suspect in custody in Tyler's case. They didn't name suspect.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigh Sister View Post
    Brief segment on GMA.

    Nothing new reported. JT said again that DB/JI will not be answering any more questions from LE and that they've already answered every question 5 times.
    Not directed at you, SS, just responding to what JT said.

    GMAFB. Even every fool knows that since 10/4, and then 10/8, LE/FBI have come up with much info (no thanks to DB & JI) and evidence that they want to ask more questions about. (sorry, bad grammar)

    And LE has said that they have questions about "who came and went" from the house, and those are amongst the questions that the parents refuse to answer. Plus they refuse to be interviewed separately.

    I need a Valium. j/k, that was meant figuratively, IOW, DB and JI are making me wish I had a tranquilizer on hand!!!

    ETA: must go to the "parents not" thread, I guess. I am a self-correcting member.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,059
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigh Sister View Post
    Brief segment on GMA.

    Nothing new reported. JT said again that DB/JI will not be answering any more questions from LE and that they've already answered every question 5 times.
    Now, how can JT know what questions LE has developed after nearly 6 weeks of investigation? And, how many times is too many times to be asked questions in the pursuit of your missing baby? Mom is presumably foggy or blacked out about the night the child went missing and Dad presumably wasn't home (but was certainly told some version of events by Mom). They need to be confronted with what LE has learned from others and questioned separately (with their lawyers) to get to the truth. Baby Lisa disappeared from inside of her house, nothing will be more helpful in trying to find her than determining who was at the house, who could have been at the house, and what was going on there, imo. Whoever took Lisa was in that house and knew Lisa was in that house, that's a fact (unless you believe a phone jacker decided to snag a baby in the process). JT and the parents dont' want to talk to LE about specific details and they refuse to talk separately even though they have top notch lawyers who can damn sure prevent abusive or coercive interrogations. JMO...

    Tell us when the parents are willing to answer all of LE questions in separate interviews JT. That will be news.
    Last edited by yllek; 11-16-2011 at 09:14 AM.
    My opinions only, with respect to all those whose opinions differ

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigh Sister View Post
    Brief segment on GMA.

    Nothing new reported. JT said again that DB/JI will not be answering any more questions from LE and that they've already answered every question 5 times.
    Does it mean they're going to be admittedly uncooperative from now on? Even if LE has a brand new still hot very shiny question it won't be answered?

    JMO but I don't understand what the point is. Why did JT go on GMA to say that? Besides media exposure for JT himself, I don't see how his clients benefit from the atty going around saying the clients have stopped answering when LE calls.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,059
    Quote Originally Posted by Donjeta View Post
    Does it mean they're going to be admittedly uncooperative from now on? Even if LE has a brand new still hot very shiny question it won't be answered?
    Nope, cuz Tacopina says LE can submit questions to him and Picerno and they'll field answers from the parents.
    My opinions only, with respect to all those whose opinions differ

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,372
    Quote Originally Posted by Donjeta View Post
    Does it mean they're going to be admittedly uncooperative from now on? Even if LE has a brand new still hot very shiny question it won't be answered?

    JMO but I don't understand what the point is. Why did JT go on GMA to say that? Besides media exposure for JT himself, I don't see how his clients benefit from the atty going around saying the clients have stopped answering when LE calls.
    I'd have to watch it again, but I understood him to mean they will not be answering ANY further questions at all. This is only my interpretation.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,066
    Quote Originally Posted by yllek View Post
    Nope, cuz Tacopina says LE can submit questions to him and Picerno and they'll field answers from the parents.
    exactly! These people are supposed to be professionals at getting to information - one way or another. I'm embarrassed for them and their level of ability to get their job done.

    edit: I didn't realize this was in the wrong thread. sorry for the ot. i've copied this to the proper thread.
    Last edited by jadejazzkayla; 11-16-2011 at 09:47 AM. Reason: ot info


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,861

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,059
    Quote Originally Posted by jadejazzkayla View Post
    exactly! These people are supposed to be professionals at getting to information - one way or another. I'm embarrassed for them and their level of ability to get their job done.
    LE or the lawyers?

    Either way, we'll have to agree to disagree. The parents are not talking. They own the house, it's their child, the child went missing from the house, mom may or may not remember things about that night but is no longer answering questions... Tacopina and Picerno are doing the job that the parents are retaining them to do; defend them. The parents can go against the lawyers advice on behalf of their child at any time. I think the job that is being embarassingly carried out here is the job of the parents to put their childrens' best interests ahead of their own.

    JMO and I'll go to the "parents aren't answering vital questions" thread before I get us in trouble!
    My opinions only, with respect to all those whose opinions differ

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by askfornina View Post
    That link was a story about the coach molestation travesty. Didn't see a link there for JT/Baby Lisa propoganda.

    I know it's not your fault about the link.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,861
    Quote Originally Posted by Cazzie View Post
    That link was a story about the coach molestation travesty. Didn't see a link there for JT/Baby Lisa propoganda.

    I know it's not your fault about the link.
    hmm strange, the video isn't there any more. when i clicked on it earlier, it brought me to the right video. i'll be keeping an eye out for it.

    perhaps this one will work
    http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/miss...yKBuDI.twitter

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,059
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigh Sister View Post
    Suspect in custody in Tyler's case. They didn't name suspect.
    Just confirmed to be Tyler's mom who is the suspect in custody, waiting for the DA to determine/file charges.

    Tyler's thread:
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...154790&page=28

    RIP sweet Tyler Dasher
    My opinions only, with respect to all those whose opinions differ

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. MSM Coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/20/11
    By yllek in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-21-2011, 01:13 AM
  2. MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/19/11
    By yllek in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 01:23 PM
  3. MSM Coverage of Baby Lisa 11/17/11
    By yllek in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 11-18-2011, 02:10 AM
  4. MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/8/11
    By Cazzie in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 793
    Last Post: 11-09-2011, 08:17 AM
  5. MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/7/11
    By ynotdivein in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 287
    Last Post: 11-08-2011, 08:11 AM

Tags for this Thread