992 users online (208 members and 784 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,250

    LAPD zero in on final 48 potential victims: Do you know any of them?

    http://laist.com/2011/11/03/lapd_zer..._potential.php

    The Los Angeles Police Department says they are focusing on the last batch of women depicted in photographs seized from the residence of Grim Sleeper serial killer, Lonnie Franklin Jr. Of the initial 180 females whose images were included in Franklin's extensive collection, a "Final Forty-Eight" are the last to be identified, and possibly counted among his victims, says the LAPD.

    "Unfortunately, as the photo grouping continues to be reduced, the likelihood that the women were victimized by Lonnie Franklin increases," note authorities.


    Updated PDF flyer with the photos of the women:
    http://lapdonline.org/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,602
    There's a PDF on that page of missing women and the file is named "grim sleeper new victs"...........did they find out more or..?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    200
    http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-gr...1.photogallery

    They can't find or I.D. #166? Are they blind?


  4. #4
    Omg...good point

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,602
    They may have figured out who she is but cannot track her down. D Johnson is probably really common too.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudette View Post
    They may have figured out who she is but cannot track her down. D Johnson is probably really common too.
    Per the LAPD poster, she is not only unfound but unidentified. It's not just the police. You'd think someone she knew or worked with could come forward given what her job seems to have been, the quality of the picture, and the nametag. Yet there she is in the "Final 48." ????

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,250
    There are 42 photos in the poster now.

    It looks like they've finally identified the white woman who was in the same photo with a child.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    11

    Question #39

    Does anyone know if #39 was identified? I was digging through some pictures on The Charley Project and stumbled across a girl that looks very similar to #39, but is really hard to be certain due to poor photo quality.

    http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/b/bray_laroya.html

    (Laroya Bray)


    http://www.latimes.com/media/acrobat...2/58310839.pdf (photo line up)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,250
    Number 39 is still there in the updated version of the poster of the as-yet-unidentified persons on the LAPD site. There are currently 42 photos.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    11
    Any thoughts on the two pictures?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,477
    http://www.lapdonline.org/grimsleeper

    #39 isn't there anymore.

    I assume the women that are no longer there they have identified as being alive because his victim list hasn't grown, correct?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,602
    Quote Originally Posted by danzn16 View Post
    http://www.lapdonline.org/grimsleeper

    #39 isn't there anymore.

    I assume the women that are no longer there they have identified as being alive because his victim list hasn't grown, correct?
    I would say that yes they have been identified if the pictures have been taken down. I wouldn't assume that it means they are alive - they could be missing or deceased but they are not ready to announce this yet.

    Everything is MOO and I am always willing to be wrong!


    October 2013 marked 60 years since Evelyn Hartley's violent kidnapping while babysitting.

    We need fresh eyes in the case - please visit us in
    Evelyn's thread!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,602
    Quote Originally Posted by danzn16 View Post
    http://www.lapdonline.org/grimsleeper

    #39 isn't there anymore.

    I assume the women that are no longer there they have identified as being alive because his victim list hasn't grown, correct?
    I still see 39 btw...in the PDF?

    Everything is MOO and I am always willing to be wrong!


    October 2013 marked 60 years since Evelyn Hartley's violent kidnapping while babysitting.

    We need fresh eyes in the case - please visit us in
    Evelyn's thread!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,602
    Anyone think this

    https://identifyus.org/en/cases/full_report/4462

    Could be 23, 36, 87 (who I think are the same person)? Does it look like it could be 1973? The link calls out the UID had red/auburn hair.

    Everything is MOO and I am always willing to be wrong!


    October 2013 marked 60 years since Evelyn Hartley's violent kidnapping while babysitting.

    We need fresh eyes in the case - please visit us in
    Evelyn's thread!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,477
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudette View Post
    I still see 39 btw...in the PDF?
    Wow sorry not sure how I missed that, you are right she's still there

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-28-2011, 07:13 PM
  2. Potential JAG victims
    By JBean in forum Amber Dubois
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 07:51 AM
  3. Linking potential victims through Dandy's dog hair
    By MeoW333 in forum Gary M Hilton
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-30-2009, 12:17 PM

Tags for this Thread