1316 users online (266 members and 1050 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    6,066

    WA - David Silverstein & Lyudmila Shimonova for welfare fraud, Seattle, 2011

    http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-feds...ory?hpt=ju_bn6

    Federal prosecutors filed suit against Lyudmila Shimonova and David Silverstein in civil court Friday, and federal agents raided their $1.2 million lakefront home.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    104
    This is an outrage. One can only help they will also be charged criminally, in addition to the restitution and penalties. They are selfish criminals and a disgrace to their Jewish heritage.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    Comments following the article making complaints that the gov. isn't asking enough from the couple in asking for repayment, and $11,000 fine for each charge.

    In some ways they are right. In most cases, this type of fraud would result in criminal charges. But in that case it would end up costing the gov. not only for the prosecution but also for the incarceration. This way there is some chance of getting some of the money back.

    But he was a chiropractor. They should also be checking his office records. If she was fraudulently collecting welfare, there is a good possibility that he could have been fraudently collecting from medicare and medicaid claiims.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by mysteriew View Post
    Comments following the article making complaints that the gov. isn't asking enough from the couple in asking for repayment, and $11,000 fine for each charge.

    In some ways they are right. In most cases, this type of fraud would result in criminal charges. But in that case it would end up costing the gov. not only for the prosecution but also for the incarceration. This way there is some chance of getting some of the money back.

    But he was a chiropractor. They should also be checking his office records. If she was fraudulently collecting welfare, there is a good possibility that he could have been fraudently collecting from medicare and medicaid claiims.
    Mysteriew, you are absolutely right about checking the good doctor's office records for medicare and medicaid fraud. I did not think of that. Perhaps this is why the DA had not determined criminal charges yet. And, what about the IRS?

    Is the $11,000 per claim, i.e., each month they collected money? This would add up to a considerable sum.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,573
    Quote Originally Posted by mysteriew View Post
    Comments following the article making complaints that the gov. isn't asking enough from the couple in asking for repayment, and $11,000 fine for each charge.

    In some ways they are right. In most cases, this type of fraud would result in criminal charges. But in that case it would end up costing the gov. not only for the prosecution but also for the incarceration. This way there is some chance of getting some of the money back.

    But he was a chiropractor. They should also be checking his office records. If she was fraudulently collecting welfare, there is a good possibility that he could have been fraudently collecting from medicare and medicaid claiims.
    They will get it all back and then some. They are asking for full repayment and an $11000 fine for each false claim. There could be many false claims.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheGarden View Post
    Mysteriew, you are absolutely right about checking the good doctor's office records for medicare and medicaid fraud. I did not think of that. Perhaps this is why the DA had not determined criminal charges yet. And, what about the IRS?

    Is the $11,000 per claim, i.e., each month they collected money? This would add up to a considerable sum.
    They said per charge. So it depends on how they figured the charges. They could file one charge for each month they cashed each check. But usually they don't. Still with that amount of money, I would expect to see quite a few charges.

    The way they worded the programs that were defrauded it is like they are trying to hide which program it is. But to me it looks like possibly FHA or the Calif equivalent or some subsidized housing, SSI, and Food stamps. Maybe. To have received that amount she would have had to be ineligible and collecting for a long time.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    5,878
    Quote Originally Posted by mysteriew View Post
    <Respectfully snipped>

    But he was a chiropractor. They should also be checking his office records. If she was fraudulently collecting welfare, there is a good possibility that he could have been fraudently collecting from medicare and medicaid claiims.
    BBM: one of the most fraudulent ridden specialties in billing . . . Wow! They totally need to look at his records
    ~ krimekat ~
    Live in Peace & Peace will live in you

    ++++++++++++
    Forum Information & Esoterica

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    5,878
    Couple received $135,000 in federal housing assistance, plus money from a federal program for destitute disabled people and a state program meant to feed poor families.

    “All these programs are need-based programs, meaning that a person can qualify for the programs only if he or she demonstrates that his or her income or resources fall below a certain level,” the HUD agent told the court.


    http://www.king5.com/news/local/Feds...134943613.html

    she received more than $1,200 a month in public housing vouchers, plus monthly cash from the federal and state government for a disability, as well as food stamps.
    ~ krimekat ~
    Live in Peace & Peace will live in you

    ++++++++++++
    Forum Information & Esoterica

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    4,236
    Living large, traveling the world, enjoying life to the fullest! This kind of thing makes me seethe!

    Many people temporarily down on their luck cannot get government assistance. Yet the "pros" who haven't had a wage-earner for generations, or like this couple, riding high on the system..... I cannot say anymore, it wouldn't be ladylike & I do not want to get banned for profanity. SEETHE, I tell you!!!!!

    My Opinion: Two of every three welfare workers should be investigating fraud instead of signing on more clients.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    From what I have read I don't think they would have caught this one without a specific complaint.

    From what I have read, the key seems to be that the couple is believed to be married. Which would make his income countable for her. But what they presented to the government is that they weren't married and that he was her landlord and charged her rent.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    9,262
    Prison for Wealthy couple Who Took Welfare

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-...are/?tag=stack


    A Seattle couple who collected welfare while living in a $1.2 million waterfront home are headed to prison.

    A federal judge sentenced chiropractor David Silverstein and his longtime partner, Lyudmila Shimonova, to 18 months in prison Friday. Silverstein also must pay a criminal fine of $30,000, even though he's already paid $334,000 in restitution and civil penalties.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    9,262
    Wealthy couple who live in $1.2m home and drive a Jaguar* jailed after claiming $2,000-a-month welfare for eight years

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz27DIAuSRu



Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY WA - David Scratchley for attempted child rape, Seattle, 2011
    By Missizzy in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-10-2016, 09:05 PM
  2. GUILTY WA - David Koenigs, 57, found murdered, Seattle, 14 Dec 2005
    By mysteriew in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-04-2015, 09:29 AM
  3. FL - Cocoa store owner arrested for $367,000 welfare fraud
    By Reader in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 11:51 AM
  4. David Race Bannon a fraud
    By Roy Harrold in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 08:23 AM

Tags for this Thread