789 users online (181 members and 608 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 177
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    17,926

    "Jersey" and MW #3

    Please continue here.

    Please remember the special rules for this case. You can read them right here:

    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7311632#post7311632"]Etiquette & Information - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]


    Remember the TOPIC and discuss accordingly.

    The majority of the last 50 posts on the previous thread (#2) were Off Topic. Don't copy any posts over from thread #2 that do not discuss the connection between Jersey and MW.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,380
    Carried over form the other thread. . .

    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick
    Lets take the parents out of it for a second (there is plenty of speculation for them already).

    If the perp had abducted BL but needed assistance, perhaps they thought about someone who would be able to help them, such as Jersey. The call to the phone perhaps was meant to locate Jersey.
    But I still think, if it was a SODDI, that they had to have intimate knowledge of the Bradley/Irwin household. Did DB or JI ever stop into the bar? What about SB?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,230
    Quote Originally Posted by hambirg View Post
    Carried over form the other thread. . .



    But I still think, if it was a SODDI, that they had to have intimate knowledge of the Bradley/Irwin household. Did DB or JI ever stop into the bar? What about SB?
    What do you mean by 'intimate' knowledge? Like a layout? The house isn't very big, most robberies try to look for things out in the open. IDM (and others) have also mentioned there were multiple access points to the house.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Centered
    Posts
    2,916
    Ok, I just have to restate something I said yesterday. Upon thinking about the sequence of events that first week, I think it was Friday night I was asked about Jersey and not the first night like I thought. I was getting things all screwed up in my head as we have talked to LE on several different occasions. The neighbors by the lawn watering house did though tell LE initially about Jersey immediately after Lisa was reported missing and LE was going around asking questions. I didn't connect them asking me about Jersey to the 'handyman' though because the description that was being given out by the media did not match the image I was shown for Jersey, nor was I given the description of 'handyman'. It took me a few days of wondering if that 'handyman' was Jersey and then I found out it was. I also thought LE was asking me about a Johnny Tango, not Tanko. I guess I wasn't alone in that thought either as several heard Tango instead also. The neighbors of the lawn watering house were supposedly describing a handyman in his 20's with no name attached according to the media, I was given the description of a bike riding thief that appeared to be in his 40's that went by the name Jersey or Johnny Tango.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, Penninsula
    Posts
    17,541
    I get the impression JT would be much more interested in stealing objects/cash. A ten month old would slow him down. I can't see him and MW as being involved. Why would the perp need anyone's assistance? A 25# child is very easy to put into a duffle bag and go.

    MW and Jersey just complicate a relatively easy disposal.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Centered
    Posts
    2,916
    Quote Originally Posted by hambirg View Post
    Carried over form the other thread. . .



    But I still think, if it was a SODDI, that they had to have intimate knowledge of the Bradley/Irwin household. Did DB or JI ever stop into the bar? What about SB?
    I too, think if it was a SODDI it was not some random stranger. I have always thought this. It had to be somebody that knew a lot of things about that night IMO. And if it was a SODDI and it was somebody familiar with the family, DNA wouldn't rule them out as it could have been there at other times also. DNA could only be useful in this situation if it was a stranger SODDI IMO. The light switches may not be useful if JI already went through the house at first turning off the lights.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Whisperer View Post
    I get the impression JT would be much more interested in stealing objects/cash. A ten month old would slow him down. I can't see him and MW as being involved. Why would the perp need anyone's assistance? A 25# child is very easy to put into a duffle bag and go.

    MW and Jersey just complicate a relatively easy disposal.
    MW (and you can say in some ways Jersey due to his track record) are involved because it was her number that was dialed that night. IMO that was not a random number being dialed.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,230
    Quote Originally Posted by In da Middle View Post
    I too, think if it was a SODDI it was not some random stranger. I have always thought this. It had to be somebody that knew a lot of things about that night IMO. And if it was a SODDI and it was somebody familiar with the family, DNA wouldn't rule them out as it could have been there at other times also. DNA could only be useful in this situation if it was a stranger SODDI IMO. The light switches may not be useful if JI already went through the house at first turning off the lights.
    I what complicates things like DNA is there were multiple people in and out of the house all day prior to BL going missing. Everyone from the parents/PN/SB/SB's daughter/anyone else we don't know. That's a lot of DNA co-mingling in that house.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    1,349
    I really would like to know whether there was any unaccounted for DNA found in the house. Jersey's prints would be on file with LE (convicted felon) but I do not know if MO or NJ standardly performs DNA collection for felony arrestees.

    Edited to add:

    I answered my own question, at least partly. Both NJ and MO have passed a law allowing LE to collect DNA on felony arrests. Do know know when those laws were enacted, though. http://dnasaves.org/states.php
    Last edited by Minette; 12-13-2011 at 05:22 PM. Reason: Added info/link

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    15,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Whisperer View Post
    I get the impression JT would be much more interested in stealing objects/cash. A ten month old would slow him down. I can't see him and MW as being involved. Why would the perp need anyone's assistance? A 25# child is very easy to put into a duffle bag and go.

    MW and Jersey just complicate a relatively easy disposal.



    BBM: I totally agree ...

    JMSSO = Just My Super Secret Opinion


  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,173
    Jersey, the bike riding thief. I totally forgot about this. So Jersey rode a bike to get around mainly, I guess. The story of the swollen knee because of being hit by a car makes a bit of sense now, in that he could have been on a bike and knocked over, or he just wiped out on his bike. He claims he was hit by a car while walking on Lister.

    Anyway, here is the link to Ron Rugen's blog for more information about Jersey and his swollen knee: http://kansascitypi.blogspot.com/201...isa-irwin.html

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    497
    Why would the neighbors who used Jersey and trusted him describe him as a 20 year old?

    Also, as for the co mingled DNA etc in the home, that is why LE wants to talk with DB and JI again, they have repeatedly said they need to know who was in and out of that house that evening. They need to rule people out but they can't move out with the case as long as this hangs out there.

    The eyewitness on the motorcyle never ID'd Jersey either as the baby carrier, he ID's someone ELSE who lives in the neighborhood. He actually ruled Jersey out because it seems Jersey photo was in there as well (if I remember correctly)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    1,349
    Quote Originally Posted by madge View Post
    Why would the neighbors who used Jersey and trusted him describe him as a 20 year old?

    Also, as for the co mingled DNA etc in the home, that is why LE wants to talk with DB and JI again, they have repeatedly said they need to know who was in and out of that house that evening. They need to rule people out but they can't move out with the case as long as this hangs out there.

    The eyewitness on the motorcyle never ID'd Jersey either as the baby carrier, he ID's someone ELSE who lives in the neighborhood. He actually ruled Jersey out because it seems Jersey photo was in there as well (if I remember correctly)
    Good question about the age thing! The only thing I can figure is based on the various mugshots that have been posted--depending on how long is hair is, etc. he looks like a completely different person. That might have complicated the photo ID, as well.

    I am still wondering about why LE is apparently so sure that someone other than they've already been told about was in the house. So I keep coming back to DNA. Or possibly someone told them that they observed someone that DB did not mention going in. But in that case, as SB was there until fairly late, wouldn't she know about it as well? I guess she could have told LE about someone else coming by or that someone was supposed to stop by, but if LE had a witness to DB covering up the presence of someone being in the house then you'd think they would have confronted her about it/arrested her. Plus, according to Ron Rugen SB & DB are still friendly, which seems unlikely if she is going to be used as a witness against DB.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    497
    Quote Originally Posted by Minette View Post
    Good question about the age thing! The only thing I can figure is based on the various mugshots that have been posted--depending on how long is hair is, etc. he looks like a completely different person. That might have complicated the photo ID, as well.

    I am still wondering about why LE is apparently so sure that someone other than they've already been told about was in the house. So I keep coming back to DNA. Or possibly someone told them that they observed someone that DB did not mention going in. But in that case, as SB was there until fairly late, wouldn't she know about it as well? I guess she could have told LE about someone else coming by or that someone was supposed to stop by, but if LE had a witness to DB covering up the presence of someone being in the house then you'd think they would have confronted her about it/arrested her. Plus, according to Ron Rugen SB & DB are still friendly, which seems unlikely if she is going to be used as a witness against DB.
    I am beginning to think they have DNA not connected to anyone in the home and they'd like to know for sure who was in and out of there so they can ask for DNA samples.

    I don't think SB has been forthright. IMHO the foursome of DB, JI, SB and JB may have some skeletons that none of them want falling out so it's a "keep your mouth shut kinda thing"

    Don't believe a stranger abducted her and since the family says they don't know Jersey or that he's ever been in there home I just dont' believe he took the baby. Again, nobody (a thief I mean) walks in a house with all the lights on ...they just move to one that is dark.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    624
    Quote Originally Posted by madge View Post
    Again, nobody (a thief I mean) walks in a house with all the lights on ...they just move to one that is dark.
    The lights were on when JI came home, but could it be that:

    1) the lights were out went DB went to bed (as per SB).
    2) the BL death/abduction/disposal took place with lights out
    3) one of the kids got up to go potty or back to his room and turned on the lights but this was after BL was gone.

    I don't believe an intruder OR DB turned those lights on, nor do I believe DB went to bed with them on.

Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-23-2015, 11:24 PM
  2. GUILTY TX - Dr. Calvin Day for sexual assault of patient, San Antonio, 2013
    By wfgodot in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-27-2013, 10:02 AM
  3. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 11-06-2011, 02:11 AM
  4. New Jersey school fight."You tube" contributes to the violence
    By dark_shadows in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 05:32 PM

Tags for this Thread