A child with rickets is a victim of child neglect in and of itself imo. The vitamin supplements are cheap enough that there is no excuse not to make sure the baby gets some vitamin D.
:cow:
Isn't there anybody who tells parents these things? Our pediatric nurse has reminded us several times.
This isn't always the case - there are plenty of reasons that a child could have rickets without neglect. As mysteriew mentioned, 2% milk can be one culprit. Inadequate absorption of minerals is another - that's not always apparent.
While the articles are interesting, the infantile rickets theory is still considered fringe by a lot of criminal defense attorneys. The scientists and doctors who are promoting this theory tend to be more fringe doctors and the studies aren't incredibly large or have faults in their set-up. That's not to say that this cannot be a valid defense, BUT - brittle bones are more likely to be caused by a metabolic bone disorder, rather than infantile rickets/temporary brittle bone disease.
Still, I'm glad that there's a lot more attention being paid to these "shaken baby" cases and that there's critical scrutiny of the now-defunct "triad" of symptoms. After I worked a big case (a successful defense for a man I believe to be truly innocent) this summer involved alleged shaken baby syndrome, it was eye-opening how many different things can mimic these types of injuries, from genetic disorders, to symptoms of disease, to other injuries. It's scary to think how many people may be in prison because of faulty science that has not been revisited.
And then, when you look at the textbooks for child abuse specialist board certification for physicians specifically employed to spot and testify about abuse (generally at children's hospitals), it's even scarier. For child abuse specialists, there is no differential diagnosis. Once a child is slotted into the "abuse" track, very little is done in terms of ruling out other possible medical causes. It all becomes about building a case.
That's not to say that these people don't have an important job - they very much do, and most of the time, they get it right. But it is so, so hard with nonverbal infants. It concerns me that there's not more scrutiny applied. :twocents: