Page 48 of 79 FirstFirst ... 38 46 47 48 49 50 58 ... LastLast
Results 706 to 720 of 1180
  1. #706
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Flor-eee-duh
    Posts
    1,687
    Quote Originally Posted by concentric View Post
    Why the nose piercing?

    I'm at the newsstand the other day and reading an article about the movie: "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo." The actress in that movie has a nose piercing. Months ago, I brought up the topic of: "Nikita," or "La Femme Nikita." The character was a criminal who was trained to be an operative assassin for the government.

    In the article about the movie, "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo," the character was likened to other similar characters in movies, such as "Nikita," as I mention, above.

    Still, wonder: Why the nose piercing? And do you think she lasered the Bella Vita Tattoo?

    Who do you think FCA thinks she is now?
    Now she thinks she's Rooney Mara as Lisbeth Salander? LOL. I'm waiting for the bleached eyebrows and the razor-cut asymmetrical black hair. Not to mention a dragon tattoo. Oh felon Anthony, you are SO pathetic.

    Re: The psych evals and depos; even if all of this bullcarpy has come out during the trial, with the Pinellas 12 it wouldn't have made any difference. They could have found her guilty of any number of lesser charges but they gave her a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card...except for the lying. Don't you think that would have been the tip off? She's a liar. They agreed she's a liar. She lies like a rug to save her own bacon...any fool can see it. Apparently, the Pinellas 12 came from a specially-bred variety of fool: deaf, DUMB and blind ...to justice. As other posters have noted, they were way more interested in what movies they would get to watch and what was for dessert, than seeing that little Caylee received some measure of justice.

    When the felon reoffends (and she will), I hope they are pleased that they let this monster loose on society.

    Caylee Marie Anthony Travis Alexander: Never forgotten


  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jane the dood For This Useful Post:


  3. #707
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,522
    Quote Originally Posted by TotallyObsessed View Post
    Yes. But I guess my PROBLEM is that I see posters even to this day, who read the depos for instance, and believe that FCA was having a come to Jesus moment and telling all the dirty. Not so in my mind. She was putting out her defense in order or get it substantiated for trial. I'm sure that she and the DT practiced this crapola ad infinitum in their meetings. She is, if nothing else, a good actress for people with sub par brain cells who evidently can't think past a flirty smile. I DON'T MEAN ANYBODY HERE - I mean a certain 12 people.
    LOL I always thought her smile was evil


  4. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to grammieto5 For This Useful Post:


  5. #708
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by ziggy View Post
    Is this because Jose wanted to change the story so that a jury would swallow it easier? Hm.

    How did it go from the nanny, to George molesting and killing and disposing of Caylee to an accidental drowning and George doing cover up? My guess is Jose and his lawyering skills. It's not right. It's not ethical. Can't prove it but it's so easy to infer don't you think?
    Exactly! How does JB and team get away with that??? It seems obvious that she was concocting stories on her own and the her DT changed them to fit their purpose. Is that illegal?
    Can anyone tell me what's happening with the Bar Complaints against JB?


  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to wsreader For This Useful Post:


  7. #709
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,786
    Quote Originally Posted by grammieto5 View Post
    LOL I always thought her smile was evil
    This is always what FCA's smile reminded me of:
    http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...RINCHSMILE.gif
    Attached Images Attached Images



  8. #710
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,808
    Quote Originally Posted by FTWTX View Post
    Exactly! How does JB and team get away with that??? It seems obvious that she was concocting stories on her own and the her DT changed them to fit their purpose. Is that illegal?
    Can anyone tell me what's happening with the Bar Complaints against JB?
    Well George could always sue for wrongful death - if the had the spine.


  9. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Solace For This Useful Post:


  10. #711
    Eidetic's Avatar
    Eidetic is offline Open your eyes to the millions of lies that they tell you every day.
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Meeting with spiritual advisors and therapists
    Posts
    3,078
    I also find it pitiful that Casey couldn't tell the exact date or even year her parents were married to this Weitz character but in the recent video diary released, she seems to be under the impression the entire month of March is her birthday. Strange behavior for someone who alleges to have been so close with their mother that the mother was confiding within the daughter supposed sexual issues troubling the marriage and from a girl both "Doctor" and "patient" claim need perfection in their life.

    "She's safe. She's in God's loving arms. In a lot of ways, I'm content by the fact that she will never have to have her heart broken, or see the constant negativity that our society breeds -nor will she ever be abused or taken advantage of." -Casey Anthony
    "They just want Caylee back, that's all they're worried about right now,"- Casey Anthony

    "I'm so angry and disappointed in our country's legal system, it makes me sick." -Casey Anthony
    "I guess you could say I am living for free off the kindness of strangers." -Casey Anthony
    "(Both of my parents are) not working, still, and yet, have the means to travel all over the country and don't feel that they have to explain where or why. Odd, right? -Casey Anthony

    I am so sorry Caylee.


  11. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Eidetic For This Useful Post:


  12. #712
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Flor-eee-duh
    Posts
    1,687
    Quote Originally Posted by scmom View Post
    This is always what FCA's smile reminded me of:
    http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...RINCHSMILE.gif




    GRINCH SMILE, indeed!
    Caylee Marie Anthony Travis Alexander: Never forgotten


  13. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jane the dood For This Useful Post:


  14. #713
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by FTWTX View Post
    Exactly! How does JB and team get away with that??? It seems obvious that she was concocting stories on her own and the her DT changed them to fit their purpose. Is that illegal?
    Can anyone tell me what's happening with the Bar Complaints against JB?
    I was just mentioning this thing in another thread. Is it ethical for a lawyer to knowingly do this?


  15. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to belle3 For This Useful Post:


  16. #714
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5,658
    Quote Originally Posted by belle3 View Post
    I was just mentioning this thing in another thread. Is it ethical for a lawyer to knowingly do this?
    I really hope Kronk sues Baez over this. This is the most disgusting thing imaginable - knowingly LYING about Kronk to free a murderer. Unbelievable.
    Justice for GEORGE!


  17. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Horace Finklestein For This Useful Post:


  18. #715
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    29
    What doesn't make sense to me is why FCA remained living in the household with a man who had supposedly raped her repeatedly throughout her life. There were ways she could have escaped from that situation. She DID have a job at Universal/Kodak and had income. She could have rented an apartment or shared a place with a roommate. Heck, she could have afforded a studio or efficiency apartment. Who would want to continue living with their rapist??? After Caylee was born, or even while she was still pregnant with Caylee and hadn't given birth yet, FCA would have qualified for Government assistance in the form of rent, food stamps, medical care, assistance with utilities and even free schooling so she could have obtained her GED and gone on to higher education to attain a degree and get a better job in the future and not need assistance. But she didn't do that. Instead, she stayed in the same household with her "rapist". And then she allowed that "rapist" to care for her daughter in her absence. She had options available to her where she could have escaped having to live with her "rapist", yet she chose to stay. And she chose to have her daughter living in the same household and exposed to the same dangers of living with the "rapist".

    And now we're to believe these "hacked" videos where FCA states that she basically doesn't know a lot about her new computer and is trying to figure it all out - like she's some kind of newbie to using a computer - yet in one of the depos it states that she said she left her job at Universal/Kodak and became self-employed, designing and building websites for people. She was afraid to tell her parents that she left Universal/Kodak and started her own business of designing and building websites. And NOW she plays dumb about knowing how to operate a computer???

    And I wonder why, after GA supposedly produced a dead Caylee to her and said "Daddy will take care of it", why have we seen no outrage from FCA as to how "Daddy" handled Caylee's remains? Isn't she even just a teensy-weensy bit upset that GA's way of "taking care of it" was to toss Caylee into a couple of trash bags, hide her in the trunk of FCA's car and let her drive around with Caylee's body decomposing in the trunk for a few days, and then GA apparently removed the body from the trunk and tossed it into the swampy, trash-strewn woods to rot and be eaten by animals? Isn't she even the SLIGHTEST upset about ANY of that??? And how was GA able to retrieve the body from the trunk and toss it into the woods, when the car was in FCA's possession during all that time?

    All of this carp story is full of more holes than grandma's lace curtains.



  19. #716
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,358
    Quote Originally Posted by Chili Fries View Post
    I just think it's crazy that Casey wasn't determined to have a mental illness. Seems obvious that she is a pathological liar, which is a mental illness. The fact that the scope of these doctors' examinations didn't include at least some kind of investigation of whether she was lying or not seems to be a big hole in this case.

    There's something really wrong with Casey, we all know that. It's not a result of her being in denial of what happened to Caylee, it's something much more longstanding.
    I think, actually, that pathological lying has never made it into the DSM. I haven't cracked open my copy in a few years, and it isn't the latest version anyway, but I don't think it's in there.

    Quote Originally Posted by Solace View Post
    Well George could always sue for wrongful death - if the had the spine.
    When this idea was first raised, I did some research and concluded that George would not have standing under the Florida statute.

    Quote Originally Posted by belle3 View Post
    I was just mentioning this thing in another thread. Is it ethical for a lawyer to knowingly do this?
    It depends on what Casey told him. Clients can change their stories, and it is OK to believe them when they tell you Version 12.3 even if they are proven liars. Personally I have a strict policy of dropping clients who are proven liars or pathological blamers.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94



  20. #717
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,358
    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...an.%202012.pdf

    Nice. HHJP says his order was only to seal the depos until the trial was over--so there's no way JA violated the order by discussing the depos in his book.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94



  21. #718
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by AZlawyer View Post
    I think, actually, that pathological lying has never made it into the DSM. I haven't cracked open my copy in a few years, and it isn't the latest version anyway, but I don't think it's in there.



    When this idea was first raised, I did some research and concluded that George would not have standing under the Florida statute.



    It depends on what Casey told him. Clients can change their stories, and it is OK to believe them when they tell you Version 12.3 even if they are proven liars. Personally I have a strict policy of dropping clients who are proven liars or pathological blamers.
    Yes, but you are probably seeking fair and equitable resolution of a case, not scamming and fame and fortune......
    When there is Justice - there is Peace.



  22. #719
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Rural Alabama
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by AZlawyer View Post
    I think, actually, that pathological lying has never made it into the DSM. I haven't cracked open my copy in a few years, and it isn't the latest version anyway, but I don't think it's in there.
    Thanks AZ, you are correct, of course. Here's an interesting take on the subject if anyone is interested:

    http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.or...ticleid=105594


  23. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Chili Fries For This Useful Post:


  24. #720
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,217
    All of the childish arguing in the middle of the those depositions! The prosecution and the defense truly could not stand each other. Jose came off like a petulant little child in the face of the talent of the state. His objections were ridiculous and full of petty arguing and jabbing. I love they way they handled him am astounded at the amount of professionalism and control they showed in that courtroom after dealing with the utter nonsense Mason/Baez handed to them day in and day out.

    No love lost there. Wow.


  25. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Spice For This Useful Post:


Page 48 of 79 FirstFirst ... 38 46 47 48 49 50 58 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Casey and Family Psych Profile #11
    By momtective in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1279
    Last Post: 01-08-2013, 08:09 PM
  2. TH armchair psych thread #2
    By 32beatspersecond in forum Kyron Horman
    Replies: 202
    Last Post: 09-23-2010, 03:44 PM
  3. Search Warrants Unsealed 4/26/10
    By Nancy2441 in forum Amber Dubois
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 03:23 PM
  4. Search Warrants Unsealed 4/26/10
    By Nancy2441 in forum Chelsea King
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-26-2010, 11:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •