There is no one that would sit back and do nothing to find their child because attorneys told them to hide...except if they were more concerned for their own behinds than the life of their baby.
Not everything is a conspiracy if it goes against your frame of thinking.
Wait a second. I am not a conspiracy theorist. There are no conspiracy issues here. this is a matter of "Spin". Attorneys and even defendents using a witness to their advantage...
....Baez did it many times...so did Cindy. I have named other cases. It happens in high profile cases.
Last edited by Whisperer; 01-23-2012 at 05:21 PM.
I have NEVER believed in conspiracy crimes. There are no conspiracy issues here....this is a matter of "Spin". Attorneys using a witness to their advantage...
....Baez did it many times. Geragos used it with Laci Peterson. If it isn't people that thought they saw something, it will be another crime that occurred there and those people did it.
After reviewing hundreds of criminal files and talking to criminals, I can guarantee you I am jaded. You betcha! I believe that LE usually gets it right. Sure they make mistakes at times but in the long run, their suspicions prove to be right-on.
As far as the Anthony case goes, many people should become jaded. That was a definite show of how wrong using emotion was instead of logic. They were unwilling and probably unable to piece it together and didn't care to try. They stood behind "there is no evidence" mantra as an excuse to derail a trial of a guilty mother who murdered her daughter. There was evidence, plenty. They wanted DNA and they wanted to know how it happened...neither of which could be provided. Furthermore, it was not necessary to have.
Last edited by Whisperer; 01-23-2012 at 07:21 PM.
This was before Tacopina or Stanton were involved.
For the final time. I have no problem with what the witnesses thought they saw or did see. I don't know who Ron Rugen is but he must be important to the case because it has been suggested I may think he is a mole.
Note to self. Baby is not dressed, is alert. She has been out in the night possibly for about 4 hours...with a stranger. She is quiet...as no cries or sounds were heard.
Last edited by Whisperer; 01-23-2012 at 07:22 PM.
I have not seen a thirty pound child being held this way. She described his hands as covering her head and bringing it to his chest...with perhaps one leg of Lisa's hanging under his arm. She saw this from a window with blinds?
Does her husband ever speak and describe what he actually saw? She speaks as if she is the one who saw this and not him. Yet, it is stated it was told to her by her husband. He obviously doesn't want to tell the story himself.
Why would he make it up? I guess he could, if he were an "odd" person. But why say the baby wasnt wearing any clothes? On a fairly chilly night? And who is to say that the man carrying the baby WAS a stranger to her? Maybe he wasn't. I just don't see disregarding it out of hand.
JMSSO = Just My Super Secret Opinion
Just my opinion
A 30 pound child could be carried this way. I carried my children this way when they were sleeping. Not when they were 30 pounds, but I am only 5'1", so it wouldn't really be feasible. Or maybe the guy was purposely holding the baby's head to his chest, I dont know. I also don't know if this baby was Lisa either. But it is something to ponder, and it is not impossible.