713 users online (78 members and 635 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 83 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1234
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The beautiful roundabout of Context, Veracity, and JUSTICE
    Posts
    11,424

    State vs. Jason Lynn Young 02-29-12

    You can hold back from the suffering of the world. You have free permission to do so and it is in accordance with your nature.
    But perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could have avoided.
    Franz Kafka

    Be not simply good. Be good for something.
    HDT

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178

    State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-29-12

    NC Court Times

    9:30 - 1
    2:30 - 5

    Live Link:

    http://www.wral.com/news/video/10690077/#/vid10690077

    (does anyone have the abc link handy?)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178
    Quote Originally Posted by LolaBunnies View Post
    So he could try to say she was killed before she went to bed. That's why I think he showed his face on camera around 12am at the hotel. JMO
    That's an interesting perspective. Perhaps the lights were still on from Michelle's late guest (11 PM?). Shouldn't we assume that robbers, bad guys and husbands that murder wives at home would not turn on all the lights - including the porch and driveway lights? The fact that the lights were on at the end of the driveway would suggest that they were not turned off from the evening before when her friend drove home ... after sensing something creepy in the bushes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178
    Quote Originally Posted by gritguy View Post
    I didn't say her testimony, as a defense witness or on c-x, was proof of murder. Red herring.

    She didn't suggest the euphemism, JY did. Red herring. JY was asking her to mislead and lie, just like he regularly did, all the time. I think she even said she didn't, though she tried to justify his euphemism.

    The FIL, the BIL, the SIL to me came across as pretty straightforward. PY not so much, which is a euphemism for she told tall tales and hard to swallow stories which are euphemisms for I think she was lying, a lot.

    Therefore, I think the DT was well served to get onto the eyewitness testimony, which will have a logical bearing on the verdict.

    IMO. Others have the opinion, I guess, that she was strictly truthful and fully helpful to the defense, and that's another perspective on the testimony.
    I don't know if it's a "red herring" to demonstrate for the jury that the one mother in law interfered with the other mother in law having contact with the grandchild. It seems to me to be rather irrelevant. We already know that the two women did not get along and participated in the marriage tug of war.

    I haven't seen any comments suggesting that a mother's testimony at her son's murder trial will not have a slant. Of course it will have a slant. If anyone gets a pass for only seeing the best interpretation of the suspect's words, deeds and actions, it's the suspect's mom. Did she tell whoppers like Amanda Knox?

    Pat Young did use a euphamism when explaining why her son could not come to the phone (he was in jail). I wouldn't exactly qualify it as lying ... what euphamism would have been okay when someone is trying to explain why someone else cannot come to the phone any day of the week? Should she have said that he is in jail and can't come to the phone ... seriously?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178
    Quote Originally Posted by cody100 View Post
    She was a breath of fresh air for the courtroom. Her mind is sharp, particularly on which house and what she saw. I found it interesting that the PT even took pictures of the house, driveway, and the parked vehicle at end of driveway. The DT used those pics to verify she had the right house.
    "You had me come here for that?! "

    She made a point.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178
    Michelle Young's father told investigators his son-in-law is methodical, very smart and can change who he wants to be, according to new search warrants in the unsolved murder case of the 29-year-old pregnant mother.

    "We're convinced he's a chameleon," Alan Fisher told Wake County sheriff's investigators. "He is what you want him to be, and he's got multiple personalities and he leads you to believe that that's the person he is. The minute he's out of your presence, he's a chameleon to someone else."



    http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4507783/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,268
    What does NTO stand for? I think it is referenced for Michelle's viewing or wake and I see it discussed in relation to JY's shoes he was wearing.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by BrownRice View Post
    What does NTO stand for? I think it is referenced for Michelle's viewing or wake and I see it discussed in relation to JY's shoes he was wearing.
    Non-Testimonial Order

    A NTO was issued for JY to present himself for the collection of DNA, submit to photographs, and physical examination (for scratches, etc,). I liken it similar to a subpoena but it is for the collection of physical evidence, photos, etc and not testimony. (similar to a search warrant but it is for his person (JY in this instance) and not a location or piece of property like a house or car, etc)

    IMO
    Unless I've provided a link, everything I say is IMO

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17,673
    Where's breakfast?

    G'mornin all! We're nearing the end. I hope the prosecution ties it all up nicely for me and this jury tomorrow. On Friday, Jason Lynn Young's fate will be in the hands of this jury.

    Hoping for justice for Michelle

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    Good Morning, everybody. Anybody have a guess on who the remaining witnesses will be?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    149
    I cannot imagine any more"friends" of Jason Young will testify for the defense...each has provided damaging testimony. Dalton: never smoked, hated cigarettes. Ambrose: Young is a manipulator (I heard that and just said "daaaamn"). Barrett: Young and Cargol's "volatile" relationship (Young's history of violence toward women backed by his own friend), and intent to defraud home shield warranty. I thought Barrett made it very clear he's got nothing to do with Jason Young now...like he wasn't going to come out and say it, but that he knows Jason is a sociopathic murderer. He distanced himself from Young from the get-go.

    With friends like that, Jason...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    I keep waiting for those 12 HP to come flying in sometime. LOL Few friends want to stick around with a suspect in a homicide case.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    149
    Someone pointed out in yesterday's thread, but Georgia Tech did not have a football game that night. Nor did Virginia Tech.

    Louisville played West Virginia. http://espn.go.com/college-football/...r/2006/week/10

    Maybe it means nothing, but that's pretty curious...Mr. Barrett struck me as doing little to benefit Jason Young's case. If nothing else, it showed Jason furthering his alibi.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    With time, memories get foggy. If that is in error, it would not negate their talking with each other. I think it does nothing for either side if there was an error on what they said. I was much more interested in CB and the neighbor's testimony. That is relevant.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    554
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    I don't know if it's a "red herring" to demonstrate for the jury that the one mother in law interfered with the other mother in law having contact with the grandchild. It seems to me to be rather irrelevant. We already know that the two women did not get along and participated in the marriage tug of war.

    I haven't seen any comments suggesting that a mother's testimony at her son's murder trial will not have a slant. Of course it will have a slant. If anyone gets a pass for only seeing the best interpretation of the suspect's words, deeds and actions, it's the suspect's mom. Did she tell whoppers like Amanda Knox?

    Pat Young did use a euphamism when explaining why her son could not come to the phone (he was in jail). I wouldn't exactly qualify it as lying ... what euphamism would have been okay when someone is trying to explain why someone else cannot come to the phone any day of the week? Should she have said that he is in jail and can't come to the phone ... seriously?
    BBM IMO it wasn't so much what the euphemism was or what anyone said. The point was, JY asked PY to twist the truth and obfuscate on his behalf. She willingly complied.

    And that wasn't even for anything important - the guy was what, a broker? If she'd do that for him for something so minor as saving face, imagine what could happen with the rest of his life on the line.

Page 1 of 83 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-28-12
    By ynotdivein in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 1195
    Last Post: 02-29-2012, 08:20 AM
  2. State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-27-12
    By ynotdivein in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 865
    Last Post: 02-28-2012, 08:33 AM
  3. State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-10-12
    By nursebeeme in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 417
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 11:56 AM
  4. State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-6-12
    By Just the Fax in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 228
    Last Post: 02-07-2012, 10:07 AM
  5. State vs Jason Lynn Young 6-21-11
    By fran in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 06-22-2011, 09:26 AM

Tags for this Thread