Done for the day?
Justice for Holly Bobo🎀
45 minutes? Why bother getting the jury there for this when they could've done it on Friday. This is ridiculous!
Justice for Holly Bobo🎀
Such perfunctory questioning about important evidence. Well, about everything. I find it so odd.
Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument. - William E. Gladstone
Could have been a flip flop or a high heeled pump so then it wouldn't be relevant but I would think they would establish that. If I was on the jury I'd be scratching my head right now about that shoe. Why mention it and not talk about it?
Heck I'm not even on the jury and I'm scratching my head about that
hummmm.... Perhaps MR went back and only found one shoe because "Lillian" had already picked up the other single shoe and TLM's pr.
“Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both.” - Eleanor Roosevelt
In no way should any of my statements be construed as legal opinion or advice. I am a newly practicing lawyer (yay!) but not a verified poster here at WS. The above statement(s) are an expression of my personal opinion, for entertainment purposes only, and copyright.
I used to do a lot of driving around - both in Toronto and out of town. Never failed to surprise me how many single and even pairs of shoes I'd see on the road and off to the side of the road. Lots and lots of them. Never understood the phenomenon except to think they fell off the backs of pick-up trucks, or kids threw them out the window.
IF the single shoe found by Lillian was one of the pair belonging to MTR, it shouldn't have been far from the missing one. Anyone searching for it should have found it, whether it was LE or MTR himself. If it had been MTR, he would have also picked up the one found by Lillian. So, I suspect this single, missing shoe had no relation to the Shaq pair, which is why no more was said about it. Frustrating for us, but unimportant to the investigation.
My sentiments as well ! Leaves me to wonder though... they couldn't have had any obvious signs of blood on them. Firstly, who finds and the WASHES blood soaked shoes ??? Secondly, if there "HAD" been obvious blood on the shoes -- certainly the Crown would have asked their witness !! One would hope anyhow !
http://www.newstalk1010.com/blog/mic...tryID=10364706The Crown will have to delay the rest of its testimony for this part of the trial because it is moving along "ahead of schedule" says Attorney Michael Carnegie. They have experts booked to testify at certain times and are unable to move those availabilities up.
Lots of evidence posted on that blog too. HTH
There were so many shoes, boots clothing and other items that were flagged by searchers from Woodstock, to Guelph, Fergus Cambridge all along hiway 6 and through to Mount Forest.
That undertaking alone of having to go through all the flagged items was immense.
★★★★★ ღ♥Lois McMaster Bujold♥ღ ★★★★★
We know she couldn't have found them in March, so have to assume it was early April.London Free Press@RaffertyLFP
Sometime in March April 2009 she went for a walk near her home can't recall exact day
She intended to give them to charity, but still had them in that shopping bag almost two months after finding them. What a lucky break for LE.London Free Press@RaffertyLFP
Metcalfe was contacted on Sat May 30 by police.They were searching the area. She told police that she had found the shoes