Page 7 of 24 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 17 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 358
  1. #91
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    4,263
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamille View Post
    Well if it's relevant and it was still out there and LE couldn't find it then I would be very disappointed in our OPP.

    Could have been a flip flop or a high heeled pump so then it wouldn't be relevant but I would think they would establish that. If I was on the jury I'd be scratching my head right now about that shoe. Why mention it and not talk about it?

    Heck I'm not even on the jury and I'm scratching my head about that

    MOO
    ITA. They should have established it.

    I used to do a lot of driving around - both in Toronto and out of town. Never failed to surprise me how many single and even pairs of shoes I'd see on the road and off to the side of the road. Lots and lots of them. Never understood the phenomenon except to think they fell off the backs of pick-up trucks, or kids threw them out the window.

    IF the single shoe found by Lillian was one of the pair belonging to MTR, it shouldn't have been far from the missing one. Anyone searching for it should have found it, whether it was LE or MTR himself. If it had been MTR, he would have also picked up the one found by Lillian. So, I suspect this single, missing shoe had no relation to the Shaq pair, which is why no more was said about it. Frustrating for us, but unimportant to the investigation.

    JMO
    Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument. - William E. Gladstone


  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to antiquegirl For This Useful Post:


  3. #92
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    4,263
    Quote Originally Posted by giantalkinghead View Post
    hummmm.... Perhaps MR went back and only found one shoe because "Lillian" had already picked up the other single shoe and TLM's pr.

    MOO
    That's possible, but then why didn't the Crown ask Lillian to describe the one she found and its proximity to the Shaq pair? If there had been the remotest possibility that it was MTR's shoe, I think more info would have been heard.

    JMO
    Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument. - William E. Gladstone


  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to antiquegirl For This Useful Post:


  5. #93
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    4,263
    Quote Originally Posted by snoofer View Post
    My sentiments exactly!

    omg she washed the sneaks and tossed away the shoe!
    Well, that now explains how clean they were and the presence of the shopping bag.
    Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument. - William E. Gladstone


  6. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to antiquegirl For This Useful Post:


  7. #94
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor Bug View Post
    RaffertyLFP: Based on information from Terri-Lynne McClintic Scoyne said police mounted more intensive search of Sideroad 6 starting May 21, 2009

    Court shown aerial view of Sideroad 6 in relation to Home Depot in Guelph

    Scoyne said police obtained Shaq shoes found by Metcalfe on May 30

    Scoyne says Metcalfe had the shoes in a plastic grocery bag. Police eventually seized them. They were told Metcalfe cleaned the shoes

    Scoyne points out that shoes were laced in peculiar fashion, tucked behind tongue

    In earlier testimony McClintic said she tied her shoes in that fashion
    So the woman cleaned the shoes so she could donate them to the Sally Ann. When I clean running shoes, I remove the laces and throw everything in the washing machine. Obviously, she didn't even unlace them. It's possible forensics did find DNA, since they were only cleaned superficially. We will see. However, TLM has already confessed to kicking Tori and lacing her shoes that particular way. Nothing new here, just confirming what we've learned.


  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JayFriend For This Useful Post:


  9. #95
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by snoofer View Post
    My sentiments exactly!

    omg she washed the sneaks and tossed away the shoe!

    My sentiments as well ! Leaves me to wonder though... they couldn't have had any obvious signs of blood on them. Firstly, who finds and the WASHES blood soaked shoes ??? Secondly, if there "HAD" been obvious blood on the shoes -- certainly the Crown would have asked their witness !! One would hope anyhow !

    MOO


  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to giantalkinghead For This Useful Post:


  11. #96
    The Crown will have to delay the rest of its testimony for this part of the trial because it is moving along "ahead of schedule" says Attorney Michael Carnegie. They have experts booked to testify at certain times and are unable to move those availabilities up.
    http://www.newstalk1010.com/blog/mic...tryID=10364706

    Lots of evidence posted on that blog too. HTH


  12. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to dilbert For This Useful Post:


  13. #97
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    10,042
    Quote Originally Posted by antiquegirl View Post
    ITA. They should have established it.

    I used to do a lot of driving around - both in Toronto and out of town. Never failed to surprise me how many single and even pairs of shoes I'd see on the road and off to the side of the road. Lots and lots of them. Never understood the phenomenon except to think they fell off the backs of pick-up trucks, or kids threw them out the window.

    IF the single shoe found by Lillian was one of the pair belonging to MTR, it shouldn't have been far from the missing one. Anyone searching for it should have found it, whether it was LE or MTR himself. If it had been MTR, he would have also picked up the one found by Lillian. So, I suspect this single, missing shoe had no relation to the Shaq pair, which is why no more was said about it. Frustrating for us, but unimportant to the investigation.

    JMO
    Maybe something was said but it was missed in the tweets? Like the other shoe was found half a mile away or something. And was a ladies dress shoe or something. No idea how far Lillian walks LOL. Not a lot of reporters out there today. Will have to watch for the news articles. Sometimes they fill in stuff that the tweets don't.

    MOO


  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Kamille For This Useful Post:


  15. #98
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,248
    There were so many shoes, boots clothing and other items that were flagged by searchers from Woodstock, to Guelph, Fergus Cambridge all along hiway 6 and through to Mount Forest.

    That undertaking alone of having to go through all the flagged items was immense.
    "The dead cannot cry out for justice; it is a duty of the living to do so for them."
    ★★★★★ ღ♥Lois McMaster Bujold♥ღ ★★★★★


  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sailor Bug For This Useful Post:


  17. #99
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    4,263
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamille View Post
    Maybe something was said but it was missed in the tweets? Like the other shoe was found half a mile away or something. And was a ladies dress shoe or something. No idea how far Lillian walks LOL. Not a lot of reporters out there today. Will have to watch for the news articles. Sometimes they fill in stuff that the tweets don't.

    MOO
    London Free Press‏@RaffertyLFP

    Sometime in March April 2009 she went for a walk near her home can't recall exact day
    We know she couldn't have found them in March, so have to assume it was early April.

    London Free Press‏@RaffertyLFP

    Metcalfe was contacted on Sat May 30 by police.They were searching the area. She told police that she had found the shoes
    She intended to give them to charity, but still had them in that shopping bag almost two months after finding them. What a lucky break for LE.

    JMO
    Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument. - William E. Gladstone


  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to antiquegirl For This Useful Post:


  19. #100
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,248
    Quote Originally Posted by giantalkinghead View Post
    My sentiments as well ! Leaves me to wonder though... they couldn't have had any obvious signs of blood on them. Firstly, who finds and the WASHES blood soaked shoes ??? Secondly, if there "HAD" been obvious blood on the shoes -- certainly the Crown would have asked their witness !! One would hope anyhow !

    MOO
    When Tori went missing it was snowing and then was followed by weeks and weeks of cold rain
    "The dead cannot cry out for justice; it is a duty of the living to do so for them."
    ★★★★★ ღ♥Lois McMaster Bujold♥ღ ★★★★★


  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sailor Bug For This Useful Post:


  21. #101
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    107
    Scheduling conflict probably means the Judge had a tee time booked
    Friday looks like it will be a busy filled day. I am sure the jury is enjoying the breaks.


  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Allanae For This Useful Post:


  23. #102
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    10,042
    Quote Originally Posted by JayFriend View Post
    So the woman cleaned the shoes so she could donate them to the Sally Ann. When I clean running shoes, I remove the laces and throw everything in the washing machine. Obviously, she didn't even unlace them. It's possible forensics did find DNA, since they were only cleaned superficially. We will see. However, TLM has already confessed to kicking Tori and lacing her shoes that particular way. Nothing new here, just confirming what we've learned.
    Actually I found it interesting that they established that TLM was telling the truth about throwing out shoes. They were found (by Lillian) where she said they would be.

    The fact that Lillian only found her shoes is intriguing to me. Especially since we know that MR was back out in the area within days of the murder. If TLM was going to try to lead LE to the shoes, why would she lie and say both pairs were thrown out? Why not just say nothing about the shoes if it was only hers and there might be incriminating blood stains on them? She was the one that said there was no blood splatter at the scene from the actual murder.

    And we don't know what kind of shoes MR was wearing but they may have been missed by people who knew him if they were distinctive. Like his mother, or Amanda, or any of his other friends.

    TLM's were distinctive too but she made excuses to her mother about where her clothes went.

    MOO


  24. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Kamille For This Useful Post:


  25. #103
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Allanae View Post
    Scheduling conflict probably means the Judge had a tee time booked
    Friday looks like it will be a busy filled day. I am sure the jury is enjoying the breaks.
    Actually juries like to get back to their "normal" lives as soon as possible, imo.
    Justice for Holly Bobo🎀


  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:


  27. #104
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17,361
    Wonder if MR went back to retrieve some of the "evidence"? Maybe the blackberry he loves so much will show us where he was in the days following Tori's murder until he was arrested?

    Chapter 11
    Justice for Holly Bobo🎀


  28. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:


  29. #105
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    14,547
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamille View Post
    Actually I found it interesting that they established that TLM was telling the truth about throwing out shoes. They were found (by Lillian) where she said they would be.

    The fact that Lillian only found her shoes is intriguing to me. Especially since we know that MR was back out in the area within days of the murder. If TLM was going to try to lead LE to the shoes, why would she lie and say both pairs were thrown out? Why not just say nothing about the shoes if it was only hers and there might be incriminating blood stains on them? She was the one that said there was no blood splatter at the scene from the actual murder.

    And we don't know what kind of shoes MR was wearing but they may have been missed by people who knew him if they were distinctive. Like his mother, or Amanda, or any of his other friends.

    TLM's were distinctive too but she made excuses to her mother about where her clothes went.

    MOO
    In the surveillance video of MR in the variety store at Petro Can, he is wearing white shoes (athletic type of shoes IMO).

    Second video at this link: http://www.newstalk1010.com/blog/raf...tryID=10364674


  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to matou For This Useful Post:


Page 7 of 24 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 17 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. trial thread: 3/23/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 575
    Last Post: 03-24-2012, 12:17 PM
  2. trial thread: 3/22/2012
    By imamaze in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 568
    Last Post: 03-23-2012, 07:30 AM
  3. trial thread: 3/21/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 497
    Last Post: 03-22-2012, 09:16 AM
  4. trial thread: 3/15/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 135
    Last Post: 03-16-2012, 08:24 AM
  5. trial thread: 3/7/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 385
    Last Post: 03-08-2012, 08:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •