I just thank GOD that I have no idea what it is to be locked up.
but I had someone close to me once who was and I made sure they got every
possible convenience that could be had.
I wonder what this has to do with anything at all.
They have to have certain pants that fit, it they do not want them at
their knees, they have to have cheep sneakers if they don’t want to
be a target, they cannot have razor blades to shave, and can get
something in the canteen. (maybe eclectic shaver) I imagine that he
needed a few things to make his stay there workable.
I am baffled by people needing to know how many candy bars he eats,
or how many books he got, etc......
I never understood this even in the Anthony Saga.
I find it to be begrudging. JMO
Women are Angels.
And when someone breaks our wings,
we simply continue to fly... on a broomstick.
We're flexible like that.
One of the reporters had worked with her before, and another reporter said well you worked with her, I guess you'd know.
Ok... closing thread in one minute, please continue here...
be analyzed legally. GZ did not "just happen" to be walking in the same place. He was following him with a gun after concluding he was a criminal and calling 911 and making it clear that this a$%hole was not going to get away.
It is NOT lawful to follow someone if your intent is to detain them or prevent them from "getting away" and that is obviously what the prosecutors office has concluded happened.
Additionally, even if something is LEGAL you are reasonable for what you do and what you do, when it results in harm, will be evaluated under a "reasonable person" standard. It is clear to most of us that it is not reasonable to look at a person, conclude he is a criminal, call 911 and follow the person with a gun against the instructions of the person you have called for help and then confront the person on your own rather than waiting for LE. None of that is reasonable except perhaps for calling 911-to me, even that is on the stupid side but the law permits simple stupidity when it results in no harm which would have been the case here if GZ had done the rational thing and stopped with the 911 call.
As for your attempt to once again blame the victim, you're not the first. People who want to support GZ are welcome to do so and to believe it must have been the black kid who provoked the local hero despite a lack of any evidence to prove it. All the available evidence points to a gunman who was determined to make sure this a#$hole didn't get away. That statement you allege he said was from account # 2 from the father who also described two encounters between GZ and TM which is completely unsupported by ANY evidence.
Three things cannot long be hidden the sun, the moon, and the truth. -Confucious
What current evidence would that be? GZ's father? Frank Taafe?
According to Trayvon's girlfriend, the one person who did hear it, Trayvon said why are you following me, and it was GZ who said what are you doing here, then what sounded like a push and the phone went dead.
Hardly sounds like chest puffing on Trayvon's part. Sounds like a reasonable question, so instead of GZ saying what are you doing here, why didn't he just say who he was, why didn't he identify hiomself? The supposed adult in the situation, the one with the gun.