Page 1 of 23 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 910

Thread: 17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #27

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    20,271

    17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #27

    Please continue here.

    Remember the rules: [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159"]http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159[/ame]
    Remember the "ignore" feature on your profile page.
    Please stick with the facts as reported by LE or MSM, and link them. Link them often if necessary.
    Please clearly state when it is your opinion. If you are making an inference please clearly outline and link the facts and evidence that have led you to form that inference. Wild speculation about any case player has no place here.
    Please PM a mod with any questions or concerns and alert any TOS violations or offensive posts.
    And finally, PLEASE address one another respectfully. Last reminder.

    We are allowing MSM links only at this time...
    Blogs and Twitter links and discussion of them are allowed only if it's an approved WS link.
    The only approved links at this time are:
    Huffington Post
    Isabelle Zehnder Examiner
    Richard Hornsby's site
    Hinky Meter

    Thread #1
    Thread #2
    Thread #3
    Thread #4
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=166793"]Thread #5[/ame]
    Thread #6
    Thread #7
    Thread #8
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167219"]Thread #9[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167312"]Thread #10[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167357"]Thread #11[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167420"]Thread #12[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167490"]Thread #13[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7746243#post7746243"]Thread #14[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7749539#post7749539"]Thread #15[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7753618#post7753618"]Thread #16[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7758089#post7758089"]Thread #17[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7762916#post7762916"]Thread #18[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7767079#post7767079"]Thread #19[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=168446"]Thread #20[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7774463#post7774463"]Thread #21[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=168628"]Thread #22[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=168701"]Thread #23[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7785222#post7785222"]Thread #24[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7788782#post7788782"]Thread #25[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7794292#post7794292"]Thread #26[/ame]


    Just a reminder:
    WS does not permit links that request or suggest sending donations without the clear permission of the owners . This is to protect our members and for no other reason.
    __________________

    In this public forum, we need to stick to the facts of this case and that's our discussion here. Please, we ask that you do what you do best - SLEUTH THE CASE.

    Looking for news links? Have you found a good MSM story you'd like to share? Please post these links in the [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=166507"]Media Links No Discussion thread[/ame]

    SOUND OFF Private Forum Companion Thread
    Anyone feeling overheated or wishing to discuss the demonstrations, political, religious or racial aspects of the Trayvon Martin case, please check out our new forum in the private area of Websleuths accessible only to Websleuths members, called SOUND OFF.
    Warning: Be sure to read the Required Read sticky post. [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=168453"]Link to Trayvon Martin Sound Off[/ame]
    Last edited by imamaze; 04-19-2012 at 11:15 PM.
    When your child goes missing: A Family Survival Guide
    Missing Adult Checklist
    Websleuth's Resource Center

    F.R.I.E.N.D.S.
    Fight for you

    Respect you
    Include you
    Encourage you
    Need you
    Deserve you
    Stand by you


  2. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to imamaze For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,267
    Protesters want fire captain punished...

    MIAMI (WSVN) -- Demonstrators want a South Florida fire captain punished after he ranted about the Trayvon Martin case on his Facebook page.
    Protesters gathered at the Stephen P. Clark Center in Downtown Miami, Wednesday afternoon, holding up signs that read: "I am a parent not pathetic."


    Read more: http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/lo...#ixzz1sPmsyv7D


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Adrienne37 View Post
    Protesters want fire captain punished...

    MIAMI (WSVN) -- Demonstrators want a South Florida fire captain punished after he ranted about the Trayvon Martin case on his Facebook page.
    Protesters gathered at the Stephen P. Clark Center in Downtown Miami, Wednesday afternoon, holding up signs that read: "I am a parent not pathetic."


    Read more: http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/lo...#ixzz1sPmsyv7D
    Hasn't FB been around long enough where people know not to do any sort of ranting on FB, especially if you have an upper position of say, a fire captain?


  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,800
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    Hasn't FB been around long enough where people know not to do any sort of ranting on FB, especially if you have an upper position of say, a fire captain?
    I guess not. I don't have a "real" one myself, but have read a bunch from the cases here I have followed. Unbelievable what people put out there.
    Justice for Caylee

    "We have a different stage. We have the same actress," Sheaffer said.

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to octobermoon For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,608
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    Hasn't FB been around long enough where people know not to do any sort of ranting on FB, especially if you have an upper position of say, a fire captain?
    Apparently not. I recently fired an employee for posting about a political argument she got into with a patron in my place of business (which never should have happened to begin with). She was ranting about what a jerk this customer was on FB. Nope! Not happening in my place of business!

    MOO
    Last edited by suzihawk; 04-18-2012 at 03:17 PM. Reason: to fix horrible sentence structure. LOL

  8. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to suzihawk For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,127
    Brought over from other thread, got caught in the door.
    suzihawk
    Registered User

    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Florida
    Posts: 3,013

    I'm so sorry.
    -------------------------------------------------
    Thanks Suzihawk! I never post personal information but couldn't let this one go, based on personal experience.

    I knew from the moment I saw the sheriff video, GZ was not a victim of a beating. He wouldn't have been able to walk in the manner in which he did, both physically and emotionally. He was as calm as a cucumber. One that is beaten does not act like he did on that evening. Furthermore, he would struggle to walk due to injuries all over his body, he would feel like a truck just ran him over, especially over the next few days. He would have bruises all over his body, in the areas I mentioned, as well as others. He would have bruises on bruises. He certainly wouldn't be able to move his belongings. If he had any type of cut on the head or a nose injury, there would be blood all over, and it would not have stopped bleeding in a 1/2 hour. No way.

    JMO and thank you again.


  10. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by AngelWings444 View Post
    Brought over from other thread, got caught in the door.
    suzihawk
    Registered User

    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Florida
    Posts: 3,013

    I'm so sorry.
    -------------------------------------------------
    Thanks Suzihawk! I never post personal information but couldn't let this one go, based on personal experience.

    I knew from the moment I saw the sheriff video, GZ was not a victim of a beating. He wouldn't have been able to walk in the manner in which he did, both physically and emotionally. He was as calm as a cucumber. One that is beaten does not act like he did on that evening. Furthermore, he would struggle to walk due to injuries all over his body, he would feel like a truck just ran him over, especially over the next few days. He would have bruises all over his body, in the areas I mentioned, as well as others. He would have bruises on bruises. He certainly wouldn't be able to move his belongings. If he had any type of cut on the head or a nose injury, there would be blood all over, and it would not have stopped bleeding in a 1/2 hour. No way.

    JMO and thank you again.
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.

  11. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    I understand that, but his family is claiming his head was beaten on the concrete , and some people are claiming GZ was straddled and beaten. I wasn't talking about the SYG law. Since you mentioned it though, if he did not have injuries, I doubt this will go his way. JMO

  13. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to AngelWings444 For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    But, if you have already claimed to have been beaten and suffered severe injuries, but have been discredited, do you then get to claim that you were oops, uninjured but in mortal fear?
    I feel that is what is happening here, the statute may state that you only have to be in fear for your life, but if you choose to go whole hog and claim a terrible beating was administered, then, when that beating doesn't seem to be supported by the evidence available, I am not going to find your claims of mortal fear credible either. Moo

    With every new piece of evidence that has cast doubt about Zimmerman's terrible injuries, his family has come forward with a slightly tweaked version of the story to account (as best they can) for it. I don't believe any of it now. Moo


  15. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Inabsentia View Post
    But, if you have already claimed to have been beaten and suffered severe injuries, but have been discredited, do you then get to claim that you were oops, uninjured but in mortal fear?
    I feel that is what is happening here, the statute may state that you only have to be in fear for your life, but if you choose to go whole hog and claim a terrible beating was administered, then, when that beating doesn't seem to be supported by the evidence available, I am not going to find your claims of mortal fear credible either. Moo

    With every new piece of evidence that has cast doubt about Zimmerman's terrible injuries, his family has come forward with a slightly tweaked version of the story to account (as best they can) for it. I don't believe any of it now. Moo
    Has GZ himself claimed he suffered these 'life threatening' injuries?

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  17. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,380
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    Has GZ himself claimed he suffered these 'life threatening' injuries?
    we haven't heard anything from him have we? I am not going by what his family says though, I'd like to see some reports please!!!

  18. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to lillygator For This Useful Post:


  19. #12
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,706
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    As I understand it, you are correct. However, the problem for his defense is possibly going to center around documented evidence as to the body's location. Remember, only 18 seconds lapsed during the 911 call between GZ getting out of his vehicle and the 911 dispatcher's admonition not to follow TM. That doesn't allow for much more than 100 feet of travel on GZ's part.

    Any altercation that happened beyound that point would, to me, seem to be as a result of "Pursuing Your Ground" as opposed to "Standing Your Ground".

    I'm aware of several different locations having been given for the body, but if the SPD report and the SFD's dispatch recordings are correct, TM's body was 200 feet +/- from where GZ got out of his truck.

    IMO, if that's the case, he's got a huge problem in proving a SYG defense against an unarmed 17 year old kid who was breaking no laws.


    But there is nothing covered up that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known. Accordingly, whatever you have said in the dark will be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in the inner rooms will be proclaimed upon the housetops. Luke 12, 2-3



  20. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Concerned Papa View Post
    As I understand it, you are correct. However, the problem for his defense is possibly going to center around documented evidence as to the body's location. Remember, only 18 seconds lapsed during the 911 call between GZ getting out of his vehicle and the 911 dispatcher's admonition not to follow TM. That doesn't allow for much more than 100 feet of travel on GZ's part.

    Any altercation that happened beyound that point would, to me, seem to be as a result of "Pursuing Your Ground" as opposed to "Standing Your Ground".

    I'm aware of several different locations having been given for the body, but if the SPD report and the SFD's dispatch recordings are correct, TM's body was 200 feet +/- from where GZ got out of his truck.

    IMO, if that's the case, he's got a huge problem in proving a SYG defense against an unarmed 17 year old kid who was breaking no laws.
    Is the SPD report the same report that said GZ was wearing a 'red' jacket? (I know there were conversations on the accuracy of that).

    I guess what I'm asking is, how much accuracy are we putting in the SPD report?

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  22. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,706
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    Is the SPD report the same report that said GZ was wearing a 'red' jacket? (I know there were conversations on the accuracy of that).

    I guess what I'm asking is, how much accuracy are we putting in the SPD report?
    I really don't know. Until the SPD report came out and was largely confirmed by SFD Fire and Rescue, I was going on what Tracy Martin said. With this info, it seems to me to be the safest bet.

    I just know it would be a pretty sorry state of affairs if the police department AND the fire department were both telling us wrong.


    But there is nothing covered up that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known. Accordingly, whatever you have said in the dark will be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in the inner rooms will be proclaimed upon the housetops. Luke 12, 2-3


  23. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Concerned Papa For This Useful Post:


  24. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    If I were on GZ's jury, I would be incredibly skeptical of this SYG claim, given GZ's apparent lack of serious injuries. I don't think someone can reasonably fear great bodily harm or death from an unarmed teenager unless it could be proven that that teen was beating him mercilessly (head on concrete seems about the right breaking point to reach for the gun - though I don't believe for one minute that TM was beating GZ's head on the concrete). Anything less severe than that wouldn't fly with me for SYG.

    That said, I believe GZ initiated the confrontation, so I think SYG is a moot point.

    JMO.
    Understand this, I mean to arrive at the truth. The truth, however ugly in itself, is always curious and beautiful to seekers after it.
    -Hercule Poirot


  25. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,068
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    That is true, but the judge has to believe your story. If he doesn't believe some of it he can/may disregard all of it. That is what I hope happens when the judge hears his SYG claims.

  26. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to CathyinTexas For This Useful Post:


  27. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,266
    Quote Originally Posted by CathyinTexas View Post
    That is true, but the judge has to believe your story. If he doesn't believe some of it he can/may disregard all of it. That is what I hope happens when the judge hears his SYG claims.
    True and that's going to be the issue. I mentioned in the previous thread that without someone else or some crucial piece of evidence (TM prints on the gun handle?) that points to TM having an upper hand in the struggle, it's only going to be GZ's word and there is no way he's going to be able to get by with just that.

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to cityslick For This Useful Post:


  29. #18
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    9,923
    Quote Originally Posted by cityslick View Post
    I think the point of the SYG law (which GZ will be trying to claim) is you don't have to actually get hurt to claim self defense, just be in fear of getting hurt.
    Actually, I think you really DO have to get hurt to claim self defense, at least when you are holding a gun and the other person is unarmed.
    For Travis Alexander, a human being. Justice will prevail.


    *Gitana (means "Gypsy girl"). Pronounced "hee tah nah."


  30. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,511
    Quote Originally Posted by gitana1 View Post
    Actually, I think you really DO have to get hurt to claim self defense, at least when you are holding a gun and the other person is unarmed.
    Do you mean as a matter of law or just in practical terms?

    Because in the self-defense case where I was a juror, the defendant merely testified that he heard the victim make a threat "to put a cap in somebody's ass" and therefore reasonably believed the victim was armed with a gun.

    This was enough to get the affirmative defense instruction. (But not enough to sway the jury: it didn't seem credible that the defendant took out his knife and ran some distance toward the imaginary gun.)

  31. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  32. #20
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    9,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Nova View Post
    Do you mean as a matter of law or just in practical terms?

    Because in the self-defense case where I was a juror, the defendant merely testified that he heard the victim make a threat "to put a cap in somebody's ass" and therefore reasonably believed the victim was armed with a gun.

    This was enough to get the affirmative defense instruction. (But not enough to sway the jury: it didn't seem credible that the defendant took out his knife and ran some distance toward the imaginary gun.)
    Yeah, I was being a tiny bit facetious. Of course the "thought he had a gun" scenario would change things. But in none of the accounts about this incident do we find Zimmerman believing Trayvon was going to use a weapon on him at the time he shot him. Yes, he mentioned the "waistband" thing at the beginning but his reasoning for shooting Trayvon was because he was being assaulted, not because someone threatened to put a cap in him.

    Thus, if he had no reason to believe Trayvon was going to use a weapon, he would really need to show some evidence of real injuries to have shot at self defense since he was the only one with the weapon.

    Otherwise, what do we have? A scenario where an armed man is standing there, not being injured, but has "reasonable" fear of imminent danger of bodily harm or death? That's not gonna' fly. He could not get an affirmative defense instruction, IMO, without injuries or a reasonable belief that Trayvon was armed and was going to use that weapon on him.
    For Travis Alexander, a human being. Justice will prevail.


    *Gitana (means "Gypsy girl"). Pronounced "hee tah nah."

  33. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to gitana1 For This Useful Post:


  34. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    2,580
    Quote Originally Posted by gitana1 View Post
    Actually, I think you really DO have to get hurt to claim self defense, at least when you are holding a gun and the other person is unarmed.
    What in the statute requires injury to claim self defense per SYG?

  35. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to m00c0w For This Useful Post:


  36. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,308
    Quote Originally Posted by AngelWings444 View Post
    Brought over from other thread, got caught in the door.
    suzihawk
    Registered User

    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Florida
    Posts: 3,013

    I'm so sorry.
    -------------------------------------------------
    Thanks Suzihawk! I never post personal information but couldn't let this one go, based on personal experience.

    I knew from the moment I saw the sheriff video, GZ was not a victim of a beating. He wouldn't have been able to walk in the manner in which he did, both physically and emotionally. He was as calm as a cucumber. One that is beaten does not act like he did on that evening. Furthermore, he would struggle to walk due to injuries all over his body, he would feel like a truck just ran him over, especially over the next few days. He would have bruises all over his body, in the areas I mentioned, as well as others. He would have bruises on bruises. He certainly wouldn't be able to move his belongings. If he had any type of cut on the head or a nose injury, there would be blood all over, and it would not have stopped bleeding in a 1/2 hour. No way.

    JMO and thank you again.
    First my condolence for your injuries and attack. I hope you are recovered and well.

    I went through a similar attack to the one GZ describes and I did not bleed all over the place. My attacker focused on my head and face, surprising me from behind, throwing a punch as I turned, sending me to my knees and repeatedly punching me in the face and once I was laid out, slamming the back of my head into the floor again and again. I did not bleed profusely. I do not recall injuries or bruising to anywhere other than my head and face. The painful lumps on my scalp were not visible as I had long hair. The bruising and swelling on my face was severe, the bruising lasted for what seemed like forever and my left eye socket was sensitive for years. I was able to walk and, although I was an emotional wreck, I became very quiet and withdrawn which may have been perceived as "calm as a cucumber" but I was nothing near calm on the inside.

    IMO, I would like to know what GZ looked like the morning after as I believe that's when the bruising would really start to show. We've heard some statements from neighbors that he was wearing bandages and his nose appeared swollen, but I wonder how good a look they got of him. IOW, I don't feel that the statements, as they stand, tell us a whole lot.

    I've found GZ's account to be believable and I think his demeanor can be attributed to shock. However, I doubt he was beaten as badly as you or I. Still, I understand the overwhelming fear that your skull won't be able to withstand another blow which IMO makes a "reasonable" self defense claim. I put the word reasonable in scare quotes because I don't personally find it reasonable but I can understand why other people, and the law, would.

    ETA: I feel you on the personal experience. Whether or not GZ is to be believed, this case has really brought back some bad memories that I've had to revisit and rethink. And it's added a level of emotional connection I can't shake. Totally OT but I just wanted to say I'm with you on that!

    JMO, OMO, and
    all my comments are just my opinion. jmho. moo. etc. etc.


  37. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by gxm View Post
    First my condolence for your injuries and attack. I hope you are recovered and well.

    I went through a similar attack to the one GZ describes and I did not bleed all over the place. My attacker focused on my head and face, surprising me from behind, throwing a punch as I turned, sending me to my knees and repeatedly punching me in the face and once I was laid out, slamming the back of my head into the floor again and again. I did not bleed profusely. I do not recall injuries or bruising to anywhere other than my head and face. The painful lumps on my scalp were not visible as I had long hair. The bruising and swelling on my face was severe, the bruising lasted for what seemed like forever and my left eye socket was sensitive for years. I was able to walk and, although I was an emotional wreck, I became very quiet and withdrawn which may have been perceived as "calm as a cucumber" but I was nothing near calm on the inside.

    IMO, I would like to know what GZ looked like the morning after as I believe that's when the bruising would really start to show. We've heard some statements from neighbors that he was wearing bandages and his nose appeared swollen, but I wonder how good a look they got of him. IOW, I don't feel that the statements, as they stand, tell us a whole lot.

    I've found GZ's account to be believable and I think his demeanor can be attributed to shock. However, I doubt he was beaten as badly as you or I. Still, I understand the overwhelming fear that your skull won't be able to withstand another blow which IMO makes a "reasonable" self defense claim. I put the word reasonable in scare quotes because I don't personally find it reasonable but I can understand why other people, and the law, would.

    ETA: I feel you on the personal experience. Whether or not GZ is to be believed, this case has really brought back some bad memories that I've had to revisit and rethink. And it's added a level of emotional connection I can't shake. Totally OT but I just wanted to say I'm with you on that!

    JMO, OMO, and
    Thats an aweful thing that happened to you. How were you able to get away?

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to Phoenixfla For This Useful Post:


  39. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenixfla View Post
    Thats an aweful thing that happened to you. How were you able to get away?
    One person, out of a crowd of people, finally pulled my attacker off of me. They had to shout at me to run because I was in such a state of shock. I am a petite woman, was probably a little over 100 lbs at the time, not physically strong, but I was a darn good runner.
    all my comments are just my opinion. jmho. moo. etc. etc.


  40. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by gxm View Post
    First my condolence for your injuries and attack. I hope you are recovered and well.

    I went through a similar attack to the one GZ describes and I did not bleed all over the place. My attacker focused on my head and face, surprising me from behind, throwing a punch as I turned, sending me to my knees and repeatedly punching me in the face and once I was laid out, slamming the back of my head into the floor again and again. I did not bleed profusely. I do not recall injuries or bruising to anywhere other than my head and face. The painful lumps on my scalp were not visible as I had long hair. The bruising and swelling on my face was severe, the bruising lasted for what seemed like forever and my left eye socket was sensitive for years. I was able to walk and, although I was an emotional wreck, I became very quiet and withdrawn which may have been perceived as "calm as a cucumber" but I was nothing near calm on the inside.

    IMO, I would like to know what GZ looked like the morning after as I believe that's when the bruising would really start to show. We've heard some statements from neighbors that he was wearing bandages and his nose appeared swollen, but I wonder how good a look they got of him. IOW, I don't feel that the statements, as they stand, tell us a whole lot.

    I've found GZ's account to be believable and I think his demeanor can be attributed to shock. However, I doubt he was beaten as badly as you or I. Still, I understand the overwhelming fear that your skull won't be able to withstand another blow which IMO makes a "reasonable" self defense claim. I put the word reasonable in scare quotes because I don't personally find it reasonable but I can understand why other people, and the law, would.

    ETA: I feel you on the personal experience. Whether or not GZ is to be believed, this case has really brought back some bad memories that I've had to revisit and rethink. And it's added a level of emotional connection I can't shake. Totally OT but I just wanted to say I'm with you on that!

    JMO, OMO, and
    Thank you very much. I am so sorry this happened to you. You never shake that feeling, unfortunately. My head was repeatedly beat on the ground as someone was straddled on top of me. I commented because some posting thought the same thing happened to GZ and he had to fight for his life. In my case, I had bruises all over my back, elbows and buttocks from trying to get away and get him off of me. Furthermore, my head was beaten into the ground and there were lumps on lumps, clearly seen if you saw my scalp (like GZ). I said, IF there was a head cut, the bleeding would not stop in a 1/2 hour. Head wounds are very tough to get them to stop bleeding. Nose bleeds too. I firmly believe if he had a cut or nose bleed, he would have blood all over his shirt.

    During my attack, I never thought about the next blow, didn't have time to "think", it was pure fight for my life to get away. No thinking. My opinions about the tape are that he was not a mess, in fact not a wrinkle in his clothes, no blood, no obvious bruising, nothing..I find it hard to believe he was beaten. I believe he was the aggressor and Trayvon was his victim. I was calm after the attack, but my clothes were a mess, you could tell by how I looked, something horrible had happened, both physically and emotionally.

    Again, I am only speaking of this because someone claimed GZ was straddled and beaten, I do not believe it based on my own experience.

    I hope you continue to heal!

    All is JMO.


Page 1 of 23 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #26
    By imamaze in forum George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin General Discussion threads
    Replies: 1016
    Last Post: 04-18-2012, 01:34 PM
  2. 17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #23
    By beach in forum George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin General Discussion threads
    Replies: 907
    Last Post: 04-13-2012, 11:06 AM
  3. 17 y/o Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #20
    By ynotdivein in forum George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin General Discussion threads
    Replies: 946
    Last Post: 04-10-2012, 05:58 PM
  4. 17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #15
    By imamaze in forum George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin General Discussion threads
    Replies: 1163
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 05:28 PM
  5. FL 17 y/o Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #12
    By ynotdivein in forum George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin General Discussion threads
    Replies: 934
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 09:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •