Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 66 of 66

Thread: trial thread: 4/24/2012

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    this officer is nervous as all get out ... wonder if this is his first court appearance as a sworn witness

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    while officer was attempting to view text messages on Logan's phone, the phone died ... had to wait for a replacement battery (?) to be able to view & hear messages - then photgraphed texts from elizabeth

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to LadyL For This Useful Post:


  4. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    contacted TS by phone but did not record convo

  5. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    TS told officer last time she saw Gabriel & EJ was the 8th, last time she spoke to EJ was 26th

  6. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    last got a text from EJ on the 27th

  7. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    courtroom looks pretty empty ... wondering where all TS's church friends are ... she seemed to have a few supporters on FB

  8. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    why would the officer refer to her as tammy rich in his notes? weird ...

  9. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10,480
    He was a teacher before he was an officer..interesting
    My Twitter handle is @Lovemypupper . I had to change it due to rabid Kate Gosselin fans. Seriously. I'm not kidding.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:


  11. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10,480
    Quote Originally Posted by LadyL View Post
    why would the officer refer to her as tammy rich in his notes? weird ...
    Maybe she was flashing a big ring at him
    My Twitter handle is @Lovemypupper . I had to change it due to rabid Kate Gosselin fans. Seriously. I'm not kidding.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:


  13. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    so the prosecution easily stipulates to evidence not yet admitted but the defence says he'd be "happy to go through the rigamorol" & the judge asks him what he means by rigamoral

    and I don't know how to spell rigamoral ... don't think I've ever had occasion to learn how to spell that word lol

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LadyL For This Useful Post:


  15. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,770
    Quote Originally Posted by strawberry View Post
    Maybe she was flashing a big ring at him
    yes, the big costume ring


  16. #62
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In my own reality...it's nicer here.
    Posts
    12,036
    I had to leave earlier so I didn't get to see all of the testimony...so was this a good day for the State?

  17. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,239
    Oh, brother! I missed all but a little bit about the gps. Just woke up!
    The greatest trespasser on justice still wishes it done to him.

    EDWARD COUNSEL, Maxims

  18. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,231

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by momtective View Post
    I had to leave earlier so I didn't get to see all of the testimony...so was this a good day for the State?
    It's as if the prosecutors collected all the evidence in a big box and now want to dump it out without regard as to how it all fits together. IMO, the defense team has done an effective job of keeping the prosecution off-balance. For example, the handwriting expert was allowed to testify that writings from two different documents matched. He was not allowed to say who the writer was because the prosecutors had not laid the proper foundation for that testimony. This is like being served mystery meat in pre-school and I imagine some of the jurors are getting very frustrated. Hoping for a better day today.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to saba For This Useful Post:


  20. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,068
    I saw the reporter from San Antonio on the other day. She seemed to hint that she thinks TS was involved with EJ's trip to San Antonio and adoption of Gabriel but didn't actually say that. There is some compelling evidence but apparently the prosecution is not alledging that in this trial. I have always believed that is the case which gives me hope he is alive. I am disappointed because it looks like she may get away with all she did. The commentators on HLN seem to think she was just concerned for Gabriel's well being. I won't deny that she cared for him and wanted very much to adopt him, but I also think her involvement might be the reason that EJ went to San Antonio in the first place and if so, then TS is guilty of custodial interference at the very least imo.

  21. #66
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,153
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7831470#post7831470"]trial thread: 4/25/2012 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

    new thread for today
    This bee my opinion

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Trial Thread 4/11/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 544
    Last Post: 04-12-2012, 03:09 AM
  2. Trial Thread 4/10/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 04-11-2012, 12:16 AM
  3. trial thread: 4/02/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 270
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 10:24 AM
  4. trial thread: 3/30/2012
    By nursebeeme in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 786
    Last Post: 04-02-2012, 10:49 AM
  5. trial thread: 3/22/2012
    By imamaze in forum Victoria Stafford
    Replies: 568
    Last Post: 03-23-2012, 07:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •