Page 22 of 43 FirstFirst ... 12 20 21 22 23 24 32 ... LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 634
  1. #316
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by rossva View Post
    He no longer represents Casey Anthony. Perhaps he made or negotiated the agreement post representation. Casey Anthony is no longer his client, so what your lawyer friend quoted does not apply in this case.
    I'm aware Baez ended his representation of FCA early in the year, but for me the question is are we expected to believe she signed a waiver for Baez allowing him to say what he wants without consideration to her? No way! I think she would have wanted a commitment of $$$ before she signed any release...

    To do it out of goodwill wishing him the best of luck with his penning? IMO not a chance.
    When there is Justice - there is Peace.


  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:


  3. #317
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Georgia -- Redneck Country
    Posts
    6,294
    Quote Originally Posted by rossva View Post
    He no longer represents Casey Anthony. Perhaps he made or negotiated the agreement post representation. Casey Anthony is no longer his client, so what your lawyer friend quoted does not apply in this case.
    Yes it does apply from the standpoint of an agreement being required. If no agreement was required why would there be a rule saying they can't ask for one before the verdict? Why ask for one at all if it isn't required?

    Imagine if no agreement was needed. People could pay a fortune for a good defense and then the attorney could turn around and screw them over by writing a horrid book afterwards? Major breach of professional trust.


  4. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Sonya610 For This Useful Post:


  5. #318
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by logicalgirl View Post
    I'm aware Baez ended his representation of FCA early in the year, but for me the question is are we expected to believe she signed a waiver for Baez allowing him to say what he wants without consideration to her? No way! I think she would have wanted a commitment of $$$ before she signed any release...

    To do it out of goodwill wishing him the best of luck with his penning? IMO not a chance.
    It's very quizzical, this agreement that was signed. Why would he even need it if he already knows and he stated as such, that she is a liar? I think he did have her sign a doc. that he was no longer attorney of record and he probably added some things in there to get her to sign a waiver for some of the information, but here it is, Why? It goes right back to her being a liar. Did he have a recent devine moment where he came to terms that she would never change?-I'm speaking of him getting angry over the outting of the videos-Why would he care about her dumb videos? Forget that, many people already know what she is, what she has done and will continue to do. I think he is still siding in with her, gleaning more non truths/information that really serves no purpose other than to keep her in the news and for him to make a sheckle or two, for both of them since she's on everyone's carp list. He surely won't write about RK, he surely won't write about TM, or ZG and again as for her parents, if there is something in there that points the finger to GA again, I will blow a fuse because those allegations were/are serious enough for the SA to look into and file charges against GA, no matter when they could have happened and JB should have led the way on that one when he was her confidant, attorney of record-Where is it? I agree, the moment he knew she/they were not telling the truth(and I bet he still doesn't know the actual truth), why didn't he bail off the wagon? I always thought you had to be, for the most part, pretty upfront to the one who's going to defend you and if there are suspicions, why didn't he recuse himself? Fame? Yea, it really worked in his favor, didn't it?-not.


  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to BigMomma For This Useful Post:


  7. #319
    Zoe Bogart's Avatar
    Zoe Bogart is offline Let's not ask for the Moon, we have the Stars
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fema Region VI
    Posts
    4,840
    Quote Originally Posted by Anakerie View Post
    Baez didn't talk enough people into buying his book... lol...

    On the 8th, his book was at #80 in the Books/Biographies & Memoirs/True Accounts/Murder & Mayhem Category.

    Yesterday, the 10th, the book had climbed to the #61 position...

    Today.. It's falling... It's gone down to #68 in it's category...

    Here's the screenshot:

    This is how it reads now:

    Hardcover: 352 pages
    Publisher: BenBella Books (July 3, 2012)
    Language: English
    ISBN-10: 1937856380
    ISBN-13: 978-1937856380
    Shipping Information: View shipping rates and policies
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #7,552 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

    #57 in Books > Biographies & Memoirs > True Accounts > Murder & Mayhem




    I, too, let Amazon know that B&N has a cheaper price tag on the same item.

    In comparison, I see JA's book is in hardcover, audio, paperback, and e-book. Not to mention the movie that's in the works....plus JA's book was published by one of the well-known publishing houses.
    My brain is copyright-protected.
    Please pardon any typos. I'm a lousy typist and an even worse proofreader.


    Big Brother and the Thought Police have arrived
    1984 by George Orwell (1949)

    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.


  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Zoe Bogart For This Useful Post:


  9. #320
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,097
    Maybe they go together like peas and carrots. I doubt he ever cared, then or now, if she was guilty or not.
    The GA and drowning claims were predictable, we all read it in her jail letters, and heard CA state early on that the pool ladder was left down - all JB had to do was sit back for three years, wait for LE and the SA to spend all of their time and effort in seeking justice for Caylee and put their case on the table, then step back, find the time where it "could" have happened and - poof there was her defense. Crazy huh? But it happened.

    What if he's got GA and CA by the short hairs? What would it matter if it pointed to OCA's guilt? Most think she is anyway. I think his book will contain revelations, I think it has too - if it doesn't, everyone will know in the first 5 minutes of its release and it will be his final swan song. Think of the Dr. Phil show with the A's - that was a bust, sure people tuned in, but what did anyone learn? It was nothing but more of the same CA phony crazy train, and GA's 1 + 1 = 2 - yeah, he couldn't figure it out for 3+ years, but now he sees the light. Save it CA & GA - just stay quiet and far away.

    I don't think that JB will make that mistake, and I can picture him picking out his pocket squares now, all giddy at the thought of CA's head exploding and GA looking like a deer in headlights - giving his book the kind of exposure that money can't buy. These two paid off in spades before - and who says lighting can't strike twice?

    I did have the giggles myself at the thought of mocking him during his book tour, but now maybe I'll just ignore him. That could be the biggest burn of all - that he stands around waiting for people like me to come with my outrage and claims of "I knew it" - and what if I simply don't give him that.

    God bless little Caylee, she's the only person who truly matters in this sad situation, and I think she could get lost in all of this meshuga if I let it happened all over again.
    Judgment is not about destruction, but about setting things right.


  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to zippitydoda For This Useful Post:


  11. #321
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    You make some excellent point Zip - IMO - but let me ask you in a nutshell are you saying Baez is going to admit he got CA to lie all the way through this trial?
    When there is Justice - there is Peace.


  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:


  13. #322
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,097
    We already know that CA lied about one important matter in Caylee's case, and it was proven by LDB during the trial with evidence. IMO, CA & GA were, and remain, nothing to him but a means to an end.

    I think JB will skate around the molestation OS by reminding everyone that he said " She could be" -he did not say "She was", which would imply it was a fact.

    "This child at 8 years old learned to lie immediately. She could be 13 years old, have her father`s XXXX in her mouth and then go to school and play with the other kids as if nothing ever happened. Nothing`s wrong. That will help you understand why no one knew that her child was dead."
    Last edited by zippitydoda; 05-12-2012 at 08:23 PM.
    Judgment is not about destruction, but about setting things right.


  14. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to zippitydoda For This Useful Post:


  15. #323
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by zippitydoda View Post
    We already know that CA lied about one important matter in Caylee's case, and it was proven by LDB during the trial with evidence. IMO, CA & GA were, and remain, nothing to him but a means to an end.

    I think JB will skate around the molestation OS by reminding everyone that he said " She could be" -he did not say "She was", which would imply it was a fact.

    "This child at 8 years old learned to lie immediately. She could be 13 years old, have her father`s XXXX in her mouth and then go to school and play with the other kids as if nothing ever happened. Nothing`s wrong. That will help you understand why no one knew that her child was dead."
    Yes, good point (last para) and too bad the Pinalles 12 didn't hear it that way....
    When there is Justice - there is Peace.


  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:


  17. #324
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    16,725
    Quote Originally Posted by logicalgirl View Post
    Yes, good point (last para) and too bad the Pinalles 12 didn't hear it that way....
    Agreed, and I get fighting mad every time I think of those 12. Too sorry & too lazy to do a half way decent job of finding justice for Caylee. FCA literally got away with COLD BLOODED MURDER!

    Waves to Jose. Don't hold your breath waiting for me to buy more lies.


  18. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Tulessa For This Useful Post:


  19. #325
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,761
    Snip:

    Quote Originally Posted by zippitydoda View Post
    JA's book is in its 2nd or 3rd printing, and he just sold his book writes for a TV movie.

    What if what also really burned JB was not that JA called him smarmy in his book, but that JA wrote nicely about CA & GA, and that he felt that they were both completely duped by OCA, and where not involved in any way. What is that is not true for one or both of them, and JB can prove it? He'd not be breaking OCA's confidence, and he has none with the A's.
    Re my bold--

    I remain forever dumbfounded that even now, JA doesn't seem to realize that he was the one who got duped by CA and GA (and LA)--duped into believing that they were not really his sworn adversaries, and duped into underestimating how poisonously successful their performances on the witness stand would be. IMO, JA empowered the A's by failing to pounce on every single mistruth they uttered under in sworn testimony from day 1, and to treat them with all the harshness and threats of prosecution the law allowed from day 1. Conversely, I'll be very surprised if JB has anything unfavorable to say about CA and LA, because they were always his allies, and I doubt they will approve of him slandering GA at this point, because it's no longer necessary or helpful to OCA.
    Hawk. My BFF


  20. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Friday For This Useful Post:


  21. #326
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,217
    Confidentiality does not end when a Lawyer stops representing a client. Everything goes with them to the grave. It is an extremely protected right in law and mental/medical health. There a certain and very explicit exceptions as in "duty to warn" or if you believe a client is a danger to themselves or others in the immediate future. Other than that, all bets are off.

    Unless of course, a clients signs a waiver "waiving" their right to confidentiality, allowing the lawyer to talk without legal and ethical repercussions.

    Which is clearly what happened here.


  22. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Spice For This Useful Post:


  23. #327
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Friday View Post
    Snip:



    Re my bold--

    I remain forever dumbfounded that even now, JA doesn't seem to realize that he was the one who got duped by CA and GA (and LA)--duped into believing that they were not really his sworn adversaries, and duped into underestimating how poisonously successful their performances on the witness stand would be. IMO, JA empowered the A's by failing to pounce on every single mistruth they uttered under in sworn testimony from day 1, and to treat them with all the harshness and threats of prosecution the law allowed from day 1. Conversely, I'll be very surprised if JB has anything unfavorable to say about CA and LA, because they were always his allies, and I doubt they will approve of him slandering GA at this point, because it's no longer necessary or helpful to OCA.

    Beautiful post! In honesty, I do not think JA was ever duped by any of them, but how could he possibly go after grandparents in a court of law in this situation? He isn't a stupid man, but he also cannot come out and degrade them. The P 12 supposedly didn't know much of what happened, how would it look to them if the SA came on full boar against the Grandparents when their goal was FCA? This wasn't his baby to rock in it's entirety-This was LDB case and he was asked to come on board. I have nothing against LDB at all, but I think we would have seen a much different outcome if JA held the reins on this one. JB had a lot of dealings with this family and I'm sure he has some pretty strange and probably true stories to tell about them, but...he also was right in there with them until his wall of protection went up on his client and the parents were prevented from visiting, but here again, after that fact, he was still around them, right in the thick of it.

    His book will serve no purpose. He has nerve to call out the media, but wasn't he the one who participated fully in some media based shows instead of keeping his mouth shut? Got nobody to blame, but himself. Imo, he collected all kinds of information because he saw a book deal in his future. And yes, he also could be bearding for FCA on this as well. He also could be doing this to somehow save his backside from some things that may have gone on. Epic Fail.
    Last edited by BigMomma; 05-13-2012 at 11:15 AM.


  24. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to BigMomma For This Useful Post:


  25. #328
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by BigMomma View Post
    Beautiful post! In honesty, I do not think JA was ever duped by any of them, but how could he possibly go after grandparents in a court of law in this situation? He isn't a stupid man, but he also cannot come out and degrade them. The P 12 supposedly didn't know much of what happened, how would it look to them if the SA came on full boar against the Grandparents when their goal was FCA? This wasn't his baby to rock in it's entirety-This was LDB case and he was asked to come on board. I have nothing against LDB at all, but I think we would have seen a much different outcome if JA held the reins on this one. JB had a lot of dealings with this family and I'm sure he has some pretty strange and probably true stories to tell about them, but...he also was right in there with them until his wall of protection went up on his client and the parents were prevented from visiting, but here again, after that fact, he was still around them, right in the thick of it.

    His book will serve no purpose. He has nerve to call out the media, but wasn't he the one who participated fully in some media based shows instead of keeping his mouth shut? Got nobody to blame, but himself. Imo, he collected all kinds of information because he saw a book deal in his future. And yes, he also could be bearding for FCA on this as well. He also could be doing this to somehow save his backside form some things that may have gone on. Epic Fail.
    With respect BigMomma - can I tell you that you are writing some on point thought provoking and great posts lately??? of course but I'm loving them...
    When there is Justice - there is Peace.


  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:


  27. #329
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,697
    I wonder if one of the chapter's will be titled, "Are you a Chemist?"
    Justice for Trayvon


  28. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to LolaMoon08 For This Useful Post:


  29. #330
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by logicalgirl View Post
    With respect BigMomma - can I tell you that you are writing some on point thought provoking and great posts lately??? of course but I'm loving them...
    What can I say, except, Thank You. My ire is up is all and although I'm 1st to admit my light bulb is real dim at times, when it comes to this, it is basically him grasping at straws. When he cannot get a major publishing company to take him on, it tells me a lot-his bridges got burned big time, nobody is interested. When I read about his clarification about this bikini business, it tells me a lot-who really cares who owned what back before this began? This isn't exactly important or earth shattering-who cares! This sounds like a 10 year old trying his best with lame excuse-the man of a thousand excuses, imo. When there are 'rumors' that he is going to talk about the parents-Who cares! Each one of us has our own opinions and our own thought process on those 2; been there already, nothing new, nothing else will be a surprise-true or not-we do not want to play the game again of truth or lie anymore. If anything was so earth shattering, let him pass it on to another attorney for review and let's see some action! What's next -Dr. P? Then what? Is he going to be called as a witness in the ZG trial, What then? He sure can't claim attorney/client privelege then, now can he? He's basically left his fly wide open.
    Last edited by BigMomma; 05-13-2012 at 12:20 PM.


  30. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to BigMomma For This Useful Post:


Page 22 of 43 FirstFirst ... 12 20 21 22 23 24 32 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. CA CA - Virdell Green Jr., 46, San Jose, 30 April 2010
    By summer_breeze in forum 2010's Missing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-19-2012, 04:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •