Page 3 of 76 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1126
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by mum73 View Post
    Just wanted to point out something with the photos of the car in the previous thread (not sure how to copy them here); but the marks on the bonnet appear to be paint. There was another photo of the same car out on the driveway (will try and find it; it's the one where the word "SHE" is marked out on the driveway, by what appears to be a high pressure spray) and there was more paint on the driveway.
    Not sure it's relevant to this matter, but could be a good excuse to be washing the car when the police arrived.
    Wow! I wonder if what the police saw was in fact graffitti paint with the words
    " Shes D**d" I know its crazy but something the police saw to set up a crime scene!! IMO


  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to barrosa For This Useful Post:


  3. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by barrosa View Post
    Hi guys and brizzychick loved your earlier post great choice of words w****r!
    Can I just say that the the business partner named (female) is not the same as the suspected mistress IMO as she is still yet to be named in the media


    Thank you, I was actually coming back to say that I should have said that this lady named JF is in no way being implied as the mistress. Barossa I was worried about posting that link due to you, I am sorry I dragged her name in but I do thinks she is a clue(NOT A SUSPECT). I did not suspect that she was the mistress. It was the other one I thought but now people are saying it is neither of these women so now I have no idea who the mistress could be.


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Curiousasacat For This Useful Post:


  5. #33
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by barrosa View Post
    IMO the two women are not the same be patient...........
    This is getting confusing.

    So there is:

    1. A woman that has been interviewed by police several times, once for 4 hours, who is an ex-employee of C21 (un-named by the media)
    2. A woman who is an ex-business partner of GBC (named on the previous page).
    3. A mistress (rumoured)

    Barossa, are you saying you think these three are all different women?


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Paradox11 For This Useful Post:


  7. #34
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,429
    Although it is very interesting to read all the speculation about his business dealings, I am still convinced this case is much simpler than that: Argument (about divorce?) gone wrong, cover-up. Because the children were not at the home that night, it was probably a good opportunity for her to bring up the fact that she probably had had enough and wanted out for good. He had a lot to loose! IMO.


  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CaseClosed For This Useful Post:


  9. #35
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,429
    Quote Originally Posted by barrosa View Post
    Wow! I wonder if what the police saw was in fact graffitti paint with the words
    " Shes D**d" I know its crazy but something the police saw to set up a crime scene!! IMO
    To me it does not look like paint, but marks from a pressure washer, perhaps just the kids playing with it.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to CaseClosed For This Useful Post:


  11. #36
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by barrosa View Post
    Wow! I wonder if what the police saw was in fact graffitti paint with the words
    " Shes D**d" I know its crazy but something the police saw to set up a crime scene!! IMO
    I'm thinking the word 'she' is at the end of whatever was written. eg. "turn u on does she"

    Perhaps the gurney message was written by ABC before a fatal fight errupted (without the kids home, he would be more inclined to let it get out of control).

    The Dickie's went to clean up the house before the girls came home - and maybe this message on the path was the first thing to fix.


  12. The Following User Says Thank You to kailee For This Useful Post:


  13. #37
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by CaseClosed View Post
    Although it is very interesting to read all the speculation about his business dealings, I am still convinced this case is much simpler than that: Argument (about divorce?) gone wrong, cover-up. Because the children were not at the home that night, it was probably a good opportunity for her to bring up the fact that she probably had had enough and wanted out for good. He had a lot to loose! IMO.
    I agree. It's just the way the investigation is unfolding that makes it seem like there might be more to it.

    I just hope the QPS get whatever evidence they need to solve the case.


  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paradox11 For This Useful Post:


  15. #38
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    625
    I think what Brissiechickinthe USA is saying makes a lot of sense I think Allison would have been seen as a source of income and an inconvenience, both problems could be solved by having her out of the way. No matter what the government says, times are tough in Australia, money is tight and it is tight for people who have never had that worry before. I think the $300000 loan was not actual money but share of the business that was not paid out when the partners left. The female partner must now need the money, pressure on GBC daily to do something about it. It is a lot of money, particularly if a loan originally to get the money. Promises will have been made, he is a very flowery character and my experience of most real estate agents is they will say anything to get what they want (usually a sale).

    So the pressure is on, Allison makes a move away from the Real Estate business thus increasing the costs to GBC (having to employ another property manager, and those jobs are usual a waged position, rather than commissions). Joining Pathways (which incidental to those in Brisbane, is owned by the women who was in that farcical dog court case about 9 months, pinched the neighbours dog because she thought it wasn't being looked after well enough) to have some independence and perhaps the first step to leaving him. When Allison left GBC the beneficeries of the life insurance would change, so they had to act quickly. The kids were away for the night, perhaps that was arranged by Gerald and it was a great opportunity to do the deed.
    Last edited by spratsmum; 05-08-2012 at 07:43 PM. Reason: making sense of it


  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to spratsmum For This Useful Post:


  17. #39
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Curiousasacat View Post
    Thank you, I was actually coming back to say that I should have said that this lady named JF is in no way being implied as the mistress. Barossa I was worried about posting that link due to you, I am sorry I dragged her name in but I do thinks she is a clue(NOT A SUSPECT). I did not suspect that she was the mistress. It was the other one I thought but now people are saying it is neither of these women so now I have no idea who the mistress could be.
    Just for your info: Mods said earlier not to discuss the alleged existence of a mistress because it has not been indicated in mainstream media and is just rumour.


  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaseClosed For This Useful Post:


  19. #40
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    164
    Someone mentioned it was something 'odd' the children were told in the morning that made QPS suspicious.. obviously this was total rumour if the children were in fact staying somewhere else Thursday night. Would anyone know if the children did spend Friday at school?


  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kailee For This Useful Post:


  21. #41
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by maevelorg View Post
    Well, I said I wouldn't but, having read the entire thread from the start, finally have taken the leap. Great to see so many concerned with justice for Allison and the welfare of her children. As someone who grew up in the area and being same age (but no longer resident of Qld), Allison's murder has hit home very hard.

    Now, many threads ago there was discussion as to how closely affiliated the family really are with scouting. Available through Google+ (on public view) is the following interesting account and pictures.

    https://plus.google.com/photos/11815...72594640237393

    Note the era appropriate (!) pic of Nigel, gun and children... further on you'll see lots of the family, including GBC and siblings. Interesting to see both younger siblings obviously in military garb; GBC has an earlier what looks like army or army cadets photo but that's it. Lots of copies of diaries and pics of Baden-Powell - keeping up the family ties methinks.



    Further to the boat theory mentioned earlier: That particular creek opens up to the Brisbane River about another 50m maximum to the right of where Allison was found. The Mt Crosby Road runs up and along the top of some fairly high hills and there is no boat ramp/access in the immediate area unless you cross into Karana Downs and launch from the other side. Having spent a childhood going up and down this road on the school bus, I've had lots of experience with the hills! You can, however, see cars coming for some distance due to the angling of lights at night...

    Further to the business partner theory: Weren't both of his parents also involved in the business? They both left at the same time... is it too far fetched to consider that the female business partner could also be his mother? Food for thought and let's be honest; who is the person who enables their little Emperors in the family first? Mum. The proximity in location to his parents, the quite strange snogging display initiated by his mother... protect and enable the golden child at all costs?

    Cheers!
    And if you go further on that page one of his friends is Nigelaine Baden Clay who was talked about earlier


  22. The Following User Says Thank You to spratsmum For This Useful Post:


  23. #42
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by spratsmum View Post
    I think what Brissiechickinthe USA is saying makes a lot of senser out of the way.e. I think Allison would have been seen as a source of income and an inconvenience, both problems could be solved by having her out of the way. No matter what the government says, times are tough in Australia, money is tight and it is tight for people who have never had that worry before. I think the $300000 loan was not actual money but share of the business that was not paid out when the partners left. The female partner must now need the money, pressure on GBC daily to do something about it. It is a lot of money, particularly if a loan originally to get the money. Promises will have been made, he is a very flowery character and my experience of most real estate agents is they will say anything to get what they want (usually a sale).

    So the pressure is on, Allison makes a move away from the Real Estate business thus increasing the costs to GBC (having to employ another property manager, and those jobs are usual a waged position, rather than commissions). Joining Pathways (which incidental to those in Brisbane, is owned by the women who was in that farcical dog court case about 9 months, pinched the neighbours dog because she thought it wasn't being looked after well enough) to have some independence and perhaps the first step to leaving him. When Allison left GBC the beneficeries of the life insurance would change, so they had to act quickly. The kids were away for the night, perhaps that was arranged by Gerald and it was a great opportunity to do the deed.
    It's a convincing motive. I just can't bear to think that it was premeditated. For his poor kids to have to live with that would be horrific.


  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Paradox11 For This Useful Post:


  25. #43
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox11 View Post
    This is getting confusing.

    So there is:

    1. A woman that has been interviewed by police several times, once for 4 hours, who is an ex-employee of C21 (un-named by the media)
    2. A woman who is an ex-business partner of GBC (named on the previous page).
    3. A mistress (rumoured)

    Barossa, are you saying you think these three are all different women?
    IMO 1 and 3 are the same


  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to barrosa For This Useful Post:


  27. #44
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    39

    Nigelaine Baden-Clay

    That's actually how I found the google + account - googled their name out of interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by spratsmum View Post
    And if you go further on that page one of his friends is Nigelaine Baden Clay who was talked about earlier


  28. The Following User Says Thank You to maevelorg For This Useful Post:


  29. #45
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,429
    Quote Originally Posted by kailee View Post
    I'm thinking the word 'she' is at the end of whatever was written. eg. "turn u on does she"

    Perhaps the gurney message was written by ABC before a fatal fight errupted (without the kids home, he would be more inclined to let it get out of control).

    The Dickie's went to clean up the house before the girls came home - and maybe this message on the path was the first thing to fix.
    I don't think the works "she" has anything to do with this. The media would have picked up on it, if it is in the driveway of their house.
    Last edited by CaseClosed; 05-08-2012 at 07:42 PM. Reason: typo


  30. The Following User Says Thank You to CaseClosed For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 76 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Found Deceased WI - Sandra Schinke, 55, Vilas County, 5 April 2012
    By KaylynnCouture in forum Located Persons Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-17-2014, 11:50 AM
  2. Australia - Allison Baden-Clay, 43, Brisbane QLD, 19 April 2012 - #4
    By bessie in forum Allison Baden-Clay General Discussion Threads
    Replies: 1123
    Last Post: 05-08-2012, 02:39 PM
  3. Australia - Allison Baden-Clay, 43, Brisbane QLD, 19 April 2012 - #3
    By Salem in forum Allison Baden-Clay General Discussion Threads
    Replies: 866
    Last Post: 05-06-2012, 10:25 AM
  4. Australia - Allison Baden-Clay, 43, Brisbane QLD, 19 April 2012 #2
    By Salem in forum Allison Baden-Clay General Discussion Threads
    Replies: 1140
    Last Post: 05-05-2012, 03:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •