Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 75

Thread: John Travolta sued for sexual battery

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    onthecouch
    Posts
    11,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Gozgals View Post
    So if one is gay, they would do what he wanted??
    That makes no sense..

    Goz
    After I read my post again, I realized that was a sloppy remark. No they should not do what anybody else wants simply because they are gay. I was hoping peeps would read my mind - ha! - and understand what I meant considering the scenario. Which is, at least one 'victim' says he was picked up in a car by JT himself that had condoms visable in the console.
    This person is in the business of giving massages and gets picked up in cars by high rollers, apparently. Is this his first rodeo? Never been propositioned before and thought about a game plan if and when that should ever happen? Has he sued other clients or does he wait for the most famous one to come along before he takes action? If the masseur is gay, would it be THAT psychologically damaging for someone to suggest the route of a happy ending?

    I'm trying to get the picture of what an 'assault' entails? To me an 'assault' is when you are forced, detained and/or put in a position of bodily harm or have been forced to perform a deed (like at gunpoint) that you didn't want to do. Would someone asking for something constitute claiming an assault? Even if he got a little handsy, would that be an assault? Say 'no' and walk out. Where is the 'assault' word coming from?

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Woe.be.gone For This Useful Post:


  3. #27
    believe09's Avatar
    believe09 is offline For nothing is secret that will not be revealed
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oh Captain, My Captain
    Posts
    26,799
    The receipts prove Travolta was eating in a resturant in NYC at the time of the assault IIRC. His plane was logged also flying from LA to NYC, and it stayed overnight, again during the time the masseuse says he was assaulted.

    again, oops.

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to believe09 For This Useful Post:


  5. #28
    Emma Peel's Avatar
    Emma Peel is offline Keep your bowler hat on in times of trouble, & beware of diabolical masterminds.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    wherever they send me
    Posts
    9,999
    Quote Originally Posted by believe09 View Post
    oops.


    ya, I'll say. LOL.

    It's not like it's not been tried before.

    **********

    Methinks, Travolta must have a movie coming out soon.

    *emma runs to google*

    ah, yes. He does. Savages. due July.

    [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savages_%282012_film%29"]Savages (2012 film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    Savages is an upcoming crime–thriller film directed by Oliver Stone. It is based on the novel of the same name by Don Winslow, who co-wrote the script with Stone and Shane Salerno. The film is set for release July 6, 2012, and stars Taylor Kitsch, Aaron Johnson, and Blake Lively.
    oooo...NICE cast! Benicio, Salma, Travolta & Uma too.

    ********


    I wouldn't put it past these "defendants" to time their blackmail scheme around a blockbuster release. You know, hoping someone would just pay them to go away and be quiet.

    IMO, that's when you usually hear from the opportunists.



    ***************

    And now this from the plaintiff John Doe:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...=feeds-newsxml

    'In consideration of that, I ask the public to not judge anyone, and allow all parties to work things out in a respectful and dignified manner, and if these matters do go to court than only that final decision past appeals, etc should be considered a definitive statement on 'guilt' or 'innocence'.'
    Translation - Hey c'mon. Quit making a big deal out of this - I just wanted a little hush money and now it's not hush anymore. Darn!


    Anyway, it's just a theory.
    Last edited by Emma Peel; 05-10-2012 at 05:55 PM. Reason: added the movie link
    I know where you post.


  6. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Emma Peel For This Useful Post:


  7. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    190
    [quote=Woe.be.gone;7899450]It's more than that though because it's JT's reputation at stake. If he wanted to be out then he'd be out. If he's not gay then it's a bald faced lie and damages his reputation and hurts his family.
    If he's a closet gay, it still hurts his family. If that's the case, it will hurt his image with the people who have always wished him well. When people are famous, they betray their fans when they betray themselves.
    That's what Tiger Woods did imo.


    Maybe his wife knows and doesn't care. We don't know anything about their marriage. I don't know how it would hurt his image. The world is slowly becoming more tolerant toward the gay community. His career as a romantic lead are probably over anyway. If his fans would be upset that he was gay or bisexual, he would be better off without those fans.

    It doesn't matter who they are if they're honest about it but if who they portray themselves to be and who they are is different then they fool us. I'm not sure who the people are who take it upon themselves to make sure the world knows the truth about someone but, if you're a fan who believes the facade image, then it's disappointing to find out otherwise.
    I don't understand why famous people have to tell us who they sleep with. Again, if he's bisexual and Kelly Preston knows and loves him anyway, why should we care? One of my favorite actors, Sir Ian McKellan, is openly gay and it sure hasn't hurt his career. Most of Travolta's fans are adults and should be mature and intelligent enough to not believe in fantasies about their favorite stars. I'm old enough now to understand I'll never marry Leonardo DiCaprio. Not to say, I would turn him down either.

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jjw For This Useful Post:


  9. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    902
    Oh, this is common knowledge in Hollywood. Yes he is gay and has visited bath houses since the 80s. Why won't he just be honest with his fans? I guess he believes they will reject him and many people don't know the truth and he likes to keep a facade escpecially since his religion doesn't believe in it.

    Here's some good reads about John Travolta's preferences:
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ay-rumors.html
    http://gawker.com/5685811/

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Danaya For This Useful Post:


  11. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Danaya View Post
    Oh, this is common knowledge in Hollywood. Yes he is gay and has visited bath houses since the 80s. Why won't he just be honest with his fans?

    and your factual proof is?
    The world is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper.
    Bertrand Russell

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Glow For This Useful Post:


  13. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In a place called Vertigo
    Posts
    17,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Woe.be.gone View Post
    After I read my post again, I realized that was a sloppy remark. No they should not do what anybody else wants simply because they are gay. I was hoping peeps would read my mind - ha! - and understand what I meant considering the scenario. Which is, at least one 'victim' says he was picked up in a car by JT himself that had condoms visable in the console.
    This person is in the business of giving massages and gets picked up in cars by high rollers, apparently. Is this his first rodeo? Never been propositioned before and thought about a game plan if and when that should ever happen? Has he sued other clients or does he wait for the most famous one to come along before he takes action? If the masseur is gay, would it be THAT psychologically damaging for someone to suggest the route of a happy ending?

    I'm trying to get the picture of what an 'assault' entails? To me an 'assault' is when you are forced, detained and/or put in a position of bodily harm or have been forced to perform a deed (like at gunpoint) that you didn't want to do. Would someone asking for something constitute claiming an assault? Even if he got a little handsy, would that be an assault? Say 'no' and walk out. Where is the 'assault' word coming from?
    Lost me on the gay part still but i won't go on with it.

    Also, I don't know what you might know of the entertaining business, but being hit on for jobs,or whatever does not constitute the big day to some. It does not mean the first time at rodeo. It may be disturbing. It may mean your job is at risk, it may mean you do not work that day if someone hits on you,and you do not handle it correctly. That is a power play and it can be used.
    Having an actor who feels they can disrobe because they are higher up than you may not be an assault but it certainly is not a light situation. It is an awkward situation. It is not like joe, john or sue hitting on you.. It happens in the real world. It is not what I would call a "Walk in the park."


    goz
    Done

    PS this happens in the biz world too.

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gozgals For This Useful Post:


  15. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,247
    John Doe No. 1 in John Travolta sex abuse lawsuit dropped by attorney, report says

    John Travolta has one fewer men suing him for sexual assault, at least for now.

    John Doe No. 1, who filed suit on Monday with attorney Okorie Okorocha, has been dropped as a client by Okorocha, RadarOnline.com reports.

    The move comes after the plaintiff said he got the date of the alleged assault wrong, this after Travolta's team produced evidence the actor was in New York on the day the accuser said he was attacked in Los Angeles.

    "Okorocha did not feel he could represent John Doe #1 going forward anymore and recommend him finding another lawyer," a source told RadarOnline.com. "He is still representing John Doe #2 and other alleged victims who are possibly coming forward."


    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...#ixzz1uab9eWoU

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Blondie in Spokane For This Useful Post:


  17. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    683
    IMO JT is gay. I believe that over the years there have just been too many rumors and allegations and smoke to not know that there is a fire. That said, it's nobody's business but he and his wife. And his true fan base shouldn't be disillusioned or upset by that. I can only imagine the excruciating choice it must be for someone to be open about their sexual orientation and after having lived the facade for so long now, he probably feels trapped. I think the real problem and hypocrisy lies with his choice of "religion". It does disgust me that he denied for years his son's obvious autism due to the fact that as per Scientology, autism doesn't exist. If you can make peace with living a lie or somehow find a family dynamic that works for you and all parties involved, so be it and everyone should be able to live their lives in whichever way fulfills their personal needs. However, when it comes to your children, a parent has to be their advocate and I can't imagine allowing a religion to dictate whether or not I take action to help my child live to their best potential and seek whatever help he or she might require to treat a illness/syndrome/disease etc....it's one thing to believe in aliens sprung forth from volcanoes or whatever "knowledge"the Scientology "clears" are privy to. It's another to be delusional and blind to what is right in front of your face because your religion commands it as in regards to physical and psychological health. I have no interest in watching someone be "outed". These people should slither away from whence they came. But if/when it comes to exposing Scientology for what it is, I'm all for it.

  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to animlzrule For This Useful Post:


  19. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3,212
    Who cares if JT is gay or not? And why should it be our concern? Do you enjoy his movies? Live and let live! Enough said.

  20. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to 4Jacy For This Useful Post:


  21. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    19,166
    So the first accuser didn't even originally pick a date when Travolta could have possibly done it?
    And when Travolta presented evidence he was elsewhere the accuser says he got a date wrong?
    Why should I believe any of it, then?
    Rich celebrity makes a good target.
    Just my opinion

  22. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jjenny For This Useful Post:


  23. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    America's heartland, the Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    24,539
    Yeah, John Doe #1 who started this whole kerfluffle turns out to have picked a day when there is mounds and mounds of evidence that his story was complete fabrication.

    What I am waiting to see is what John Doe #2s story is. I find the whole thing very shady.

    Personally I think it is all about timing. JT makes for a good target and his sexuality (long questioned by some) makes the perfect means of trying to extort, er I mean Settle out of court with) from a celebrity with a new movie coming out soon.
    Five years ago I wandered in here because of a google search on Haleigh Cummings. "Welcome," folks said "look around a bit, sit a spell." It wasn't long before I found Caylee's threads. It was just that simple.

    If you are new to the site allow me to say, "welcome. Look around a bit, sit a spell."

  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to tlcya For This Useful Post:


  25. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Woe.be.gone View Post
    Are JT's accusers gay or straight? If they're gay, then why not do whatever he wanted? Come on - they're out for his money, probably because he didn't accept their offers. If they're straight, why would JT, if gay, expect anything from them? Not buying it....
    (I am removing my response because you retracted your statement in a post above. Thank you.)
    Last edited by Nova; 05-11-2012 at 06:48 PM.

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  27. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,564
    Quote Originally Posted by oh_gal View Post
    My theory on why so many famous people find themselves in situations like this:

    Famous stars can have virtually anything they want, just by making a phone call, or nodding their head. Men, women, people, are constant throwing themselves at them, just for the chance to say they've been with them (certainly, things like this don't normally happen to the rest of us). Eventually, with so many different "opportunities" being offered to them, they grow bored with what has always satisfied them before, and need a new "thrill" to up the ante. This could take the form of sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.

    There are some grounded famous people, but they seem to be the exception, rather than the norm.
    I don't know about the ratio of norms to exceptions, but I think you have the right idea.

    It's akin to the old saw: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  29. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Woe.be.gone View Post
    ...Lisa Rinna was on TV today and I heard her ask, 'why wouldn't the masseurs just leave the room if they felt violated?' Same thing I asked yesterday. What was the nature of the 'assault'? And now they need to sue JT because they're so damaged that he allegedly made a pass at them?
    BBM: Um, maybe because they needed to earn a living?

    Again, I have no knowledge as to whether the charges against JT are true. But we don't require sexual harassment victims to quit their jobs rather than filing suit, and that's basically what this lawsuit is: a sexual harassment claim.

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  31. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow View Post
    and your factual proof is?
    Oh, I obviously don't have "factual proof". But I have read accounts of gay men who have seen him. Whether you choose to believe that is up to you, of course. I believe the accounts but feel free not to.

  32. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Danaya For This Useful Post:


  33. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    On Battleship Hill
    Posts
    3,068
    There is no smoke without fire, that's what my wise old nanna used to say.
    England's dancing days are done...

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to badhorsie For This Useful Post:


  35. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    7,829
    man, the details in that lawsuit are astounding

    but if he got the date wrong, then well ...

    and yeah, I have the same question as others, what was plaintiff's penis doing out of his pants if he was there only professionally hmmm?

  36. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LadyL For This Useful Post:


  37. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    12,223
    Quote Originally Posted by 4Jacy View Post
    Who cares if JT is gay or not? And why should it be our concern? Do you enjoy his movies? Live and let live! Enough said.
    I agree. I don't care what he does with in his personal life, as long as he's not abusing children or killing anyone...or commiting violent crimes. It's obvs that the court filing is bogus based on the fact that the dude said "oopsie, I got the date wrong".

    Don't ya think if John Travolta was all up in your personal business, you might remember then when and where?

    I anticipate the cases filed thereafter will be found bogus as well.

    I feel for him and his family for the slime that come out of the woodwork to try to extort money out of him.

    MOOOOO

    Mel

  38. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Melanie For This Useful Post:


  39. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Danaya View Post
    Oh, this is common knowledge in Hollywood. Yes he is gay and has visited bath houses since the 80s. Why won't he just be honest with his fans? I guess he believes they will reject him and many people don't know the truth and he likes to keep a facade escpecially since his religion doesn't believe in it.

    Here's some good reads about John Travolta's preferences:
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ay-rumors.html
    http://gawker.com/5685811/

    I guess the reason he isnt honest with his fans is because it isnt their bussiness what he does in his bedroom ,or bathhouse??

    If it is true that is. MOO.

  40. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Soulmagent For This Useful Post:


  41. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,564
    Quote Originally Posted by badhorsie View Post
    There is no smoke without fire, that's what my wise old nanna used to say.
    Many have wondered why such rumors always seem to refer to the same group of stars. Why is it always Tom Cruise and never Brad Pitt? Pitt has just as many gay fans. Why John Travolta and never Kevin Costner?

    One answer is what you've suggested: that there's some factual basis to the rumors.

    But I think it's also possible that once a rumor of this kind takes flight, it lends credibility to additional rumors.

    If a gay man claims he was sexually harassed by Brad Pitt, who is going to believe him? But claim it was John Travolta and the story immediately gains some traction and, it appears, a certain number of believers.

  42. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  43. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    18,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulmagent View Post
    I guess the reason he isnt honest with his fans is because it isnt their bussiness what he does in his bedroom ,or bathhouse??

    If it is true that is. MOO.
    But if it's none of our business, why does Mr. Travolta employ a publicist to make sure we know all about his lovely wife, their home and their children, etc. (Sadly, in the death of his son Travolta had no choice of avoiding media coverage, but that was hardly the start of ads for Travolta's "heterosexuality".)

  44. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Nova For This Useful Post:


  45. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,905
    Actually, there have been rumors that Brad Pitt is gay. Also, George Clooney, Richard Gere, Leonardo DiCaprio, and just about every single other well known actor in the entertainment industry.

    Type this into a Google search: " (insert actor name here) gay rumors", and you'll see what I mean. I just did it with the name Brad Pitt and got back 15,500,000 hits.

    If this story had broken with the name 'Brad Pitt', or 'George Clooney', or just about any famous person's name instead of 'John Travolta', people would be writing the same things. "Oh, I'm not surprised, I've known he/ she was gay for years. Where there's smoke there's fire. I know so and so who knows so and so and know FOR A FACT that <insert celebrity name here> is gay".

    Ugh. I look forward to the day when rumors are not taken as fact, just because they are often repeated. I look even more forward to the day when one's sexual orientation stops being the business of strangers.

    "Where there's smoke there's fire"? ~ Not necessarily.
    As a user of e-cigarettes, I can tell you that what often looks like smoke is nothing more than water vapor.
    .... ....... My posts are my opinion, only.

  46. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to smart blonde For This Useful Post:


  47. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    In the Boonies of Louisiana
    Posts
    3,108
    I could care less if he is gay, straight, bisexual or asexual. That's his business, between him and his wife who obviously loves him. As long as it is between consenting adults, it's his business.

    I think these stories are pretty much made up or not the whole story. The amounts they are asking are ridiculous. I am sure that professional masseuses have been trained with how to deal with a client who wants more than a massage. That's part of being a professional, dealing with people who expect more than you are expected to provide.

    So the first guys case fell apart? And the other 2 only sued because the first one did? It's not looking so good for their case. Sounds like they were just jumping on the bandwagon looking for a big cash payday, or some quick hush money.

    Is this the first time these masseuses have ever had an issue with a client? Probably not. So why single out JT? Oh that's right, he has money!! Since JT has money, these people were much more traumatized by what they claimed happened. They probably dont care about being right, they just want to get paid. If they wanted justice they would have pressed charges, not filed for millions of dollars.

    I hope John pursues them and makes them go to court, proves them to be liars and gets money from them for his troubles.

    Why not come forward when it supposedly happened? Why wait? It just looks fishy. maybe they were willing participants and got mad when he no longer wanted their services. Was this the only time they were with him?

    I need to know more before I make any real judgements but for now I am just thinking it looks flimsy, ridiculous and like some people out for big money.

    And scientology? Well, that just creeps me out. It seems so cult-like and so bizarre. I have no idea why anyone would be so into it. They make some pretty weird claims and bombard public libraries with their books videos and just plain crap. We'd get boxes of it and not even open them. Nobody ever checked any of it out, no one was interested. But that is his religion, and again, that is his business.
    SwampMama

    GUILTY!!!

    Cyrus C. convicted of 2004 arson in Harvey, La. that killed 4 people, including his 19-month-old daughter, his teenage girlfriend, the girlfriend's mom and GF's young brother (age 11). He was acquitted in 2008 (state charges) in 2008 and found GUILTY (federal charges) in 2013

    http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/...d_of_2004.html

  48. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to SwampMama For This Useful Post:


  49. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,151
    Swampmama, I wish I could click on the "thanks" button twice for that post.

  50. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lizzybeth For This Useful Post:


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •