619 users online (78 members and 541 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    MissKitty is offline Evil is unspectacular and always human, and shares our bed and eats at our own table - W.H Auden
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    98

    Catherine Crier - New Evidence in JBR

    Coming UP in just a few minutes!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    7,140
    I wrote to Catherine Crier:

    <<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.

    Why on earth would Patsy write a letter to cover up for an intruder? She wouldn't. BUT she would do it to cover up for a Ramsey.

    It's a shame that JonBenet will never have justice. But in my opinion there was NO intruder.>>

    An intruder is completely inconsistent with the "ransom letter."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    217
    Talking about the DNA on Dan Abrams also
    Prayers for all murdered wives and children. My posts are my opinion only.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by lisafremont
    I wrote to Catherine Crier:

    <<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.

    Why on earth would Patsy write a letter to cover up for an intruder? She wouldn't. BUT she would do it to cover up for a Ramsey.

    It's a shame that JonBenet will never have justice. But in my opinion there was NO intruder.>>

    An intruder is completely inconsistent with the "ransom letter."
    It is too bad things have gone along all these years, and the case hasn't been resolved. I personally believe Burke's going to spill the beans one of these days. That kid knows a lot and once he's out of Patsy and John's hands, and get a beer or two in him, he'll talk. What a heavy burden for him to carry all these years....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,832
    I just caught the end of Abrams, and it "appeared" he was discussing the case of the girl in Jonbenet's dance school, not certain, but it seemed this case was more similar than we were told?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by sissi
    I just caught the end of Abrams, and it "appeared" he was discussing the case of the girl in Jonbenet's dance school, not certain, but it seemed this case was more similar than we were told?
    Well, I believe the family knows more than they are saying, but for poor little JonBenet, I hope the last person she saw before her life was snuffed out, wasn't her mom or dad. I hope there is something to this story.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    61
    I'm waiting to see if the 48 hours news is the same thing about the DNA that almost has enough markers to make a match to someone.I find it hard to beleive that the DNA found was so degraded in that short a period of time and with the body just lying there undesturbed by any elements or people. Also the fact that a similiar crime committed shorly there after is probably the work of a copy cat.We have all seen once a crime makes the news all the "Hey thats an idea" perps come out of the wood work.Same with law suites and the sale of Jesus Christ sandwhiches on e-bay.
    IN MY OPINION

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    14,185
    Cather Crier also said that the dna under JonBenet's fingernails also had the same markers as the dna in the panties. To see if the rapist of that poor little girl could have murdered JonBenet, looks like all they have to do is compare the dna? Boulder sounds like one perverted place with a horrible police force and da office. You couldn't pay me to move there.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by lisafremont
    I wrote to Catherine Crier:

    <<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.

    Why on earth would Patsy write a letter to cover up for an intruder? She wouldn't. BUT she would do it to cover up for a Ramsey.

    It's a shame that JonBenet will never have justice. But in my opinion there was NO intruder.>>

    An intruder is completely inconsistent with the "ransom letter."
    Catherine Crier should believe you over SIX handwriting examiners who all concluded it was EXTREMELY UNLIKELY Patsy wrote the RN? As the Dan Rather incident shows, news organizations that play fast and loose with the truth eventually are going to get burned. You can rest assured that 48 Hours is reaching the conclusion they have because they have carefully looked at the WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE in this case. You are 100% correct in your assumption that PR wouldn't have covered for an intruder, but 100% wrong in assuming she wrote RN

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Sherman Oaks, CA
    Posts
    3,955
    I think Patsy wrote the note, too. Don Foster said the wording, phrasing, abreviations, and sentice structure was consistent with everything else Patsy wrote, that he reviewed. And he reviewed a LOT of her handwriting. Besides, she CHANGED some of her handwriting, AFTER the incident.

    But, put the ransom note aside,

    http://gemart.8m.com/ramsey/note/index.html



    I personally believe their behavior, post incident is consistent with other individuals who have had involvement in crimes. They just acted soooo guilty to me. I know, I know, "...that's not enough evidence to convict someone!...." but I'm entitled to my opinion, just like everybody else.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    7,140
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWatson
    Catherine Crier should believe you over SIX handwriting examiners who all concluded it was EXTREMELY UNLIKELY Patsy wrote the RN?
    I understood that the official handwriting expert said that he COULDN'T RULE PATSY OUT. I have seen an analysis of the language of the letter which to me is obviously from Patsy and of the handwriting side by side with an exemplar of Patsy's hand and it is totally obviously HERS.

    And that's not all the evidence that convinces me. The pineapple and the Hi-Tek boot print all tell me: no intruder. It was a cover-up.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,832
    Quote Originally Posted by lisafremont
    I understood that the official handwriting expert said that he COULDN'T RULE PATSY OUT. I have seen an analysis of the language of the letter which to me is obviously from Patsy and of the handwriting side by side with an exemplar of Patsy's hand and it is totally obviously HERS.

    And that's not all the evidence that convinces me. The pineapple and the Hi-Tek boot print all tell me: no intruder. It was a cover-up.
    The "official" report said she likely didn't write the note.
    I believe the foreign dna comingled in her blood can point no where else but toward an intruder.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by sissi
    The "official" report said she likely didn't write the note.
    I believe the foreign dna comingled in her blood can point no where else but toward an intruder.
    Except that DNA can co-mingle even if deposited at different times. If I bled onto a hankerchief and it dried and then you bled onto the existing bloodstains on the same hankerchief then what would be extracted would be a mixed DNA sample - i.e. co-mingled blood.
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by lisafremont
    I understood that the official handwriting expert said that he COULDN'T RULE PATSY OUT. I have seen an analysis of the language of the letter which to me is obviously from Patsy and of the handwriting side by side with an exemplar of Patsy's hand and it is totally obviously HERS.

    And that's not all the evidence that convinces me. The pineapple and the Hi-Tek boot print all tell me: no intruder. It was a cover-up.
    Yeppers...

    *And the little coffee klatch
    *And telling the son he found JonBenet at 10 (when it was really 1)
    *And saying Jonbenet was asleep that night, yet Burke said she walked in on her own
    *And John finding the body, thus contaminating the crime scene
    *And the note coming from inside the home
    *And the conflicting stories about what she was wearing that night (red top vs what she found in)
    *And scooting Burke off early that morning without letting the police talk to him before leaving
    *And Patsy's fiber on the duct tape
    *And Patsy wearing the same clothes from the evening before
    *And John wanting to get out of Dodge with JonBenet's body
    *And the issue of alleged prior sexual abuse

    And, and, and...there's so many more...Too many things don't add up. But I believe Burke knows, and Burke is going to blow one of these days. I'd be willing to bet the farm that he heard something that night. There is no way an intruder came into that home, wrote a ransom note, abused Jonbenet and then killed her and then left her body there. If he was an molester, why leave the note? If he was a kidnapper, why leave the kid? I never made sense, and it still doesn't. Money talked in this case. But it will be Burke that settles it in the end, I believe.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    Posts
    893
    Quote Originally Posted by lisafremont
    I wrote to Catherine Crier:

    <<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.
    Funny, but I don't see any resemblence whatsoever to Patsy's handwriting. Besides, it's all about whose research you look at. As far as words and phrases that could only be Patsy's--are you a personal friend of hers? How would you know what words and phrases she uses?
    Karen

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast