Destiny Renee Brewer-November 2,1999-June 28, 2010. Destiny -I love and miss you, tiny dancer!!
Follow up on the bones found in May at the drive-in in Tucson. They had been there for several years.
Police investigating bones found at drive-in as homicide
A forensic examination determined the manner of death as a homicide, and that the bones are from a white male, between 45 and 60 years old with red hair and possibly a red beard.
Such offers, oddly enough, are often made on Fridays or the day before a holiday. This means that even if the law says "three days" if such an offer had been made to someone last Friday in my state, the hearing would be held next Thursday (Saturday, Sunday and the Fourth of July holiday don't count). For children under around 6-8 years old, a week is virtually an eternity, more time than they can really imagine.
If the family was already in crisis and the children are already upset and feeling insecure, and it's a choice between the kids staying with one parent or going to foster care... well, I can see why innocent parents go for the agreement.
As for "prior CPS involvement" I would also fall into that category. When my husband and I met, he had a 16 year old from his first marriage. My stepson had been through some terrible things before his father won full custody from his mother and was one angry, acting out kid despite 14 years in therapy. After we married, my stepson started refusing to go to therapy and was generally angry at house rules like "no illegal drugs."
So he discovered that he could cause a lot of trouble for us by reporting us to CPS. The first time he reported us, the allegation was that we were starving him. CPS came, we showed them the fridge and cabinets full of healthy, nutritious foods, we gave them permission to check my stepson's medical records (which showed his weight was normal for a 17 year old his size) and closed the investigation as "unfounded."
The next time my stepson reported us, he was more explicit in his allegations: we were not keeping soda, potato chips and pastries in the house. So CPS came out again, viewed the kitchen full of healthful foods, I explained that as a diabetic, I cannot eat such foods and it's easier if they are not in the house, showed them the containers of pre-cut veggies and fruits, the healthy dips, the yogurt, the cheese and other healthy snacks, etc. I also showed them the weekly menu lists where we each signed up for what we wanted a couple nights a week and pointed out that my stepson got what he wanted for dinner at least 3 times a week and he generally ate voraciously at every single meal (it was downright frightening for me to see how a teenage boy can eat). The investigation was closed as "unfounded."
Apparently it is not considered child abuse to withhold junk food from a teenager. <eyes rolling>
My stepson continued to report us and we continued to be investigated for the better part of a year. Every single investigation was closed as "unfounded."
Finally CPS told my stepson that if he made one more unfounded allegation against us, they would report him to the police. That finally put a stop to that merry little dance.
But in my state, anyone who has been reported to CPS goes on the list for ten years along with the results of the investigation.
Even though every single investigation was closed as "unfounded" I am sure that had we been thrust into the public eye for some reason, there would be plenty of people who would cluck and say "all those investigations, they must have been doing something wrong."
My stepson finally grew up (which involved more than one stay in jail) and has long since apologised for his behaviour back then. Now he's a parent and his little girl is one spirited, headstrong kid. <snicker>
My point, somewhere back there, is that just because someone has been investigated, even many times, doesn't mean that they had done anything wrong besides making someone angry.
I do not know who who reported them the first time (that we know about) but I have also seen a screen dump of a document showing one Rebecca Celis being reported by CPS for child abuse/endangerment, back in 2003 and 2004 - I have no way of knowing if it was the same RC however.
Also, your child didn't go missing...which in itself is yet another red flag that something was very seriously amiss in that house, in retrospect.
But again I will say... CPS will seek to place the children with other family members LONG before foster placement. Both RC and SC have substantial family in the area. So this whole foster placement is nearly moot.
(just jumping off you here).
I think the seperation is much more serious than we know at the moment. jmo
Mom was said to have custody and was living with a family member. Monitor?
It's raining! May Isa be found. Keep on raining. The forecast tonight was positive. Ahhh, the sound of rain.
Oh, and for all of us that live here in these United States.....
Have a great and safe day with the family and a wonderful evening watching the night sky with the beautiful colors!
USA! USA! USA!
"My own eyes are not enough for me, I will see through the eyes of others." ~C.S. Lewis
Maybe this is will be a harbinger of change for this case.
However you are spending the 4th of July , I hope you have a safe and happy celebration with family and friends
Can someone please link to where it was reported in MSM that if SC did not agree to this "voluntary" arrangement that both boys would be put into foster care away from BOTH parents?
I don't recall having seen that stated from a MSM source, but, Lord knows I don't recall a lot of things!
All I remember reading was that it was an agreement between SC and CPS.
There is no MSM report about this. It is an opinion from some who have dealt with or had some experience with CPS in their lives, not based on knowledge of the Isa case, specifically.Can someone please link to where it was reported in MSM that if SC did not agree to this "voluntary" arrangement that both boys would be put into foster care away from BOTH parents?
Debates are healthy; the exchange of varying opinions, valuable. Let freedom ring!
So the kids are not in foster care? Where is this little girl, another child just goes missing and not found.
Your Dream must be greater than your fear!
I know things happen, all the time, that aren't supposed to happen in regards to CPS etc...and it sounds like you've been the victim of one of these times...I'm sorry you had to go through that, it would suck.
This, however, is different IMO. I bet CPS weren't directly alerted by LE, in your case.
This has come out of an investigation of a missing child, and the only inference we can take is that there is some sort of abuse issue which has been uncovered in the course of finding Isa.
The entire difference here, IMO, is that LE REPORTED SC TO CPS. Lotsa caps in that sentence...but it wasn't an interfering neighbour, a disgruntled child...it was the Police who reported SC.
Further...your baby didn't vanish. What I mean by this, is this case is going to get a LOT of public scrutiny and attention. The departments concerned will be having their most senior people liaise to handle this one, simply because of the media involved. It will be done RIGHT, and not mishandled by some novice, or someone who's simply not very good at their job.
For these reasons, I think that personal experience with CPS, while horrible and unfair at the time, really can't be compared to what is going down here.
So is this just your opinion of the situation based on your own experiences, or do you have a link or is this insider info leaked by CPS?
If there is a link stating as fact (not opinion) that SC had no option but to agree to this separation or CPS would have ripped the boys out of the home and refused to return them, without having to prove anything in court, can someone please post it? . TIA
Sounds more like there is something very very wrong in that family for CPS to rip apart a family who has just suffered the loss of a child......MOO but I cannot fathom why CPS would do this to a family who is innocent of any wrongdoing just to be hateful.
Just to clarify; I, too, think that CPS was going to take those boys if SC did not agree to the arrangement.
Calling it "voluntary" is like calling labor pains "discomfort"......It just ain't true.
And while I do believe CPS gave SC an ultimatum, I do not believe it was done without a darn good reason. MOO
AZLawyer gave some good info about this, the "voluntary" arrangement (which isn't so voluntary) and stated it is usually for 90 days. I will try and find the post.
Evil don't look like anything...
Also there is a difference between an agreement and an order. He agreed because he knew the boys would be taken otherwise and it would lead to an order.
Evil don't look like anything...
"A "voluntary" as we call it in the AZ foster care system is not unusual at all, and is often a good idea for the parents because during the term of the agreement (90 days normally) the time does not count toward the deadline for the parents to shape up or lose their kids.
That said, the usual reason for a "voluntary" is that CPS has visited the home and told the parents, "Look, you can sign a voluntary or we can take the kids. Your call." (Once in a while there are other reasons, like the parents have just become homeless and want their kids to be safe for 90 days while they get jobs and housing.)"-AZLawyer
Here is the page the discussion was on
ETA AZLawyer is a verified attorney.
Last edited by Shelby2; 07-04-2012 at 09:18 PM.
Evil don't look like anything...